| Revision as of 10:30, 12 November 2013 editChimpu420 (talk | contribs)33 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:31, 12 November 2013 edit undoDarkness Shines (talk | contribs)31,762 edits →Notification: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| {{cite web|title=India Godhra train blaze verdict: 31 convicted|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-12534127|publisher=BBC|accessdate=12 November 2013|archivedate=22 February 2011}} | {{cite web|title=India Godhra train blaze verdict: 31 convicted|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-12534127|publisher=BBC|accessdate=12 November 2013|archivedate=22 February 2011}} | ||
| </ref> | </ref> | ||
| == Notification == | |||
| {{Ivmbox | image = yes | The ] has permitted ] to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at ]) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to ], ], and ]. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the ], satisfy any ], or follow any ]. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "]" section of the decision page. Please familiarise yourself with the information page at ], with the appropriate sections of ], and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This is a non administrator notification, and will be logged as such on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.<!-- Template:uw-sanctions - {{{topic|{{{t}}}}}} --> | valign = center | ] }} | |||
| For edit, and those that followed. ] (]) 10:31, 12 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:31, 12 November 2013
Re: Your edits on Persecution of Muslims
Hello, I have noticed that you have undone two edits by an IP. I notice that this IP was trying to make the tone of the article formal and neutral. I am here to discuss about the article and how we can compromise to make appropriate edits to the article to avoid edit warring. Thanks. Darylgolden 06:47, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello Darylgolden,I made those changes few hours ago,but i think the editing done earlier was correct.You can't probably tell what the nature of attack was especially if it happened in the 18th century.So i guess i'll have no troubles undoing my own changes. Chimpu420 (talk) 08:01, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
text
Notes
Notification
File:YesThe Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page. Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This is a non administrator notification, and will be logged as such on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.
For this edit, and those that followed. Darkness Shines (talk) 10:31, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
- ^
"India Godhra train blaze verdict: 31 convicted". BBC. Retrieved 12 November 2013.
{{cite web}}:|archive-date=requires|archive-url=(help)