Misplaced Pages

CESNUR: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:02, 16 August 2004 editAndries (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers27,090 editsm dewifkify double link← Previous edit Revision as of 19:48, 17 August 2004 edit undoAndries (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers27,090 edits not all former membersNext edit →
Line 3: Line 3:
CESNUR gives a greater weight to ] than ] and is critical about concepts like ], ], and ] asserting that they lack ] and scholarly support and are mainly based on ]. CESNUR gives a greater weight to ] than ] and is critical about concepts like ], ], and ] asserting that they lack ] and scholarly support and are mainly based on ].


CESNUR has been heavily criticized by the ] and the anti-cult movement including former members of ]. Counter cult activist ] of the Apologetics Index describes it as having " gained a reputation for being mostly uncritical and, in fact, supportive of movements considered to be cults by secular anticult- and/or Christian countercult professionals." It has also been alleged that Introvigne has links with ] and other right-wing organizations. CESNUR has been heavily criticized by the ] and the anti-cult movement including some former members of ]. Counter cult activist ] of the Apologetics Index describes it as having " gained a reputation for being mostly uncritical and, in fact, supportive of movements considered to be cults by secular anticult- and/or Christian countercult professionals." It has also been alleged that Introvigne has links with ] and other right-wing organizations.


*CESNUR affiliated scholars include *CESNUR affiliated scholars include

Revision as of 19:48, 17 August 2004

CESNUR is a center for studies on new religions, based in Turin, Italy. It is an international network of associations of scholars working in the field of new religious movements. Its director is the Italian attorney Massimo Introvigne. CESNUR claims to be independent of any religious group, church, denomination or association.

CESNUR gives a greater weight to religious freedom than anti-cult activists and is critical about concepts like mind control, thought reform, and brainwashing asserting that they lack scientific and scholarly support and are mainly based on anecdotal evidence.

CESNUR has been heavily criticized by the Christian countercult movement and the anti-cult movement including some former members of purported cults. Counter cult activist Anton Hein of the Apologetics Index describes it as having " gained a reputation for being mostly uncritical and, in fact, supportive of movements considered to be cults by secular anticult- and/or Christian countercult professionals." It has also been alleged that Introvigne has links with Alleanza Cattolica and other right-wing organizations.

External links

Sites critical of CESNUR:

This article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Category: