Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Arthur R. Thompson: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:23, 22 November 2013 editMrX (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers97,648 edits wk← Previous edit Revision as of 18:29, 22 November 2013 edit undoNathan Johnson (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers12,381 edits chickenshitNext edit →
Line 14: Line 14:
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 01:18, 22 November 2013 (UTC)</small> :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 01:18, 22 November 2013 (UTC)</small>
*'''Weak Keep''' - In addition to the source presented by Blue Rasberry, I also found this and . An argument could be made that the article meets criteria 2 of ]. - ]] 01:23, 22 November 2013 (UTC) *'''Weak Keep''' - In addition to the source presented by Blue Rasberry, I also found this and . An argument could be made that the article meets criteria 2 of ]. - ]] 01:23, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
:*If you want to argue that he meets ] then you should do so, instead of a chickenshit and vaguewaving at some guideline that doesn't apply. If someone wants to write an article about this guy, then do it. But it's been a potential BLP target (see link above) since 2007. If there were any admins with balls left, they'd delete this POS asap. But there aren't. -] (]) 18:29, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:29, 22 November 2013

Arthur R. Thompson

Arthur R. Thompson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD removed with a "reason" of "probably notable ; needs further sources" with no effort to identify sources. article has existed since 2007 with no independent sources. WP:BLPPROD doesn't apply since the article is so old. Nathan Johnson (talk) 19:31, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

See this diff. -Nathan Johnson (talk) 19:33, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Clarkcj12 (talk) 19:41, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
  • Not sure. Here is one source
If other sources are found then maybe this person is notable. He is the head of an organization which used to be influential. Blue Rasberry (talk) 22:32, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
  • If you want to argue that he meets WP:ANYBIO then you should do so, instead of a chickenshit and vaguewaving at some guideline that doesn't apply. If someone wants to write an article about this guy, then do it. But it's been a potential BLP target (see link above) since 2007. If there were any admins with balls left, they'd delete this POS asap. But there aren't. -Nathan Johnson (talk) 18:29, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Categories: