| Revision as of 21:39, 12 June 2006 editCatalan (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers7,014 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:52, 13 June 2006 edit undoAndriyK (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers3,870 edits Notice of arbitrationNext edit → | ||
| Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
| #Glantz'sources are majority Soviet because he uses recently opened Soviet/Russian archives and then compares them with German archives to analyse their accuracy. I'll reread the article throughout the week and then think of ways of including a more German perspective. Unfortunately, German memoirs, like Manstein's ''Lost Victories'', that I own are not very focused on this battle and the winter battles and Stalingrad seem to take priority over things like this. I will continue to look at sources, and I should be receiving a book on armoured warfare during the Second World War soon enough through the mail, and so I'll look through that for additional material. And, I'll scan in more images, although I'm not sure if that could create problems - I'll look around in other books, as well. ] 21:39, 12 June 2006 (UTC) | #Glantz'sources are majority Soviet because he uses recently opened Soviet/Russian archives and then compares them with German archives to analyse their accuracy. I'll reread the article throughout the week and then think of ways of including a more German perspective. Unfortunately, German memoirs, like Manstein's ''Lost Victories'', that I own are not very focused on this battle and the winter battles and Stalingrad seem to take priority over things like this. I will continue to look at sources, and I should be receiving a book on armoured warfare during the Second World War soon enough through the mail, and so I'll look through that for additional material. And, I'll scan in more images, although I'm not sure if that could create problems - I'll look around in other books, as well. ] 21:39, 12 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == Notice of arbitration == | |||
| An involving you has been filed.--] 19:52, 13 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:52, 13 June 2006
Please add new comments in a new section. Thanks, Graf.
Archives: (Feb-May '06)
I have a feeling
That neither Deng or Kurt are going to be around much longer. They just won't stop this insanity. --Woohookitty 10:06, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
AdQ
La version française d'Encélade est elle-même très fortement inspirée de ce qui existait à l'époque sur l'article en anglais. En fait c'est Volcanopele qui a fait la plus grosse partie du boulot ;) Mais bon, merci quand même ;) À+, Stanlekub 16:14, 2 June 2006 (UTC).
How
How can you not like soccer? It's really fun :-0 :). Raichu 01:01, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Congratulations on Enceladus
Good to see that the English Misplaced Pages has yet another featured article corresponding to a francophone counterpart. And quite closely, too. I can't wait to see it on the Main Page (I see it's already been nominated). Daniel Case 02:54, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Re: Second Battle of Kharkov
{{fact}} added, as requested. ;-) Kirill Lokshin 16:47, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
- Your call. I can't think of anything else that needs fixing; but I generally prefer to leave a peer review open for two or three weeks anyway, just in case anyone else wanders by with suggestions. Kirill Lokshin 20:37, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
Khoikhoi (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Log/block?page=User%3AKhoikhoi he is allowed to revert? --168.126.28.25 18:02, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
- Answered on your own talk page. -- Grafikm 18:02, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
Binary star
Hi,
Thanks for commenting on the FA nomination of Binary star. I have tried to take care of your objections.
Regards, Nick Mks 18:13, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks!
Many thanks for the barnstar! :) --Scot 08:42, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Thank you - U.S. FAC
Hi,
Thank you for supporting the recent FAC of United States, but unfortunately it failed to pass. However, I hope you will vote again in the future. In the mean time, please accept this Mooncake as a token of my gratitude.--Ryz05 t 15:35, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
Kharkov
Sorry I didn't get you a message in time. A lot has been done recently! First, I'd like to thank you for the amount of work you've put into it. I have to re-read it and see what changes have been made thus far. I will further reference some of the parts I wrote, especially the battle, to give David M. Glantz what he deserves. Please, anything that you think general rewording, tell me - I will do my best. I hope we stay in communication until this article is either featured, or not. JonCatalan 16:34, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
- Glantz'sources are majority Soviet because he uses recently opened Soviet/Russian archives and then compares them with German archives to analyse their accuracy. I'll reread the article throughout the week and then think of ways of including a more German perspective. Unfortunately, German memoirs, like Manstein's Lost Victories, that I own are not very focused on this battle and the winter battles and Stalingrad seem to take priority over things like this. I will continue to look at sources, and I should be receiving a book on armoured warfare during the Second World War soon enough through the mail, and so I'll look through that for additional material. And, I'll scan in more images, although I'm not sure if that could create problems - I'll look around in other books, as well. JonCatalan 21:39, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
Notice of arbitration
An arbitration request involving you has been filed.--AndriyK 19:52, 13 June 2006 (UTC)