| Revision as of 04:39, 14 June 2006 editDaddy Kindsoul (talk | contribs)19,776 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:40, 14 June 2006 edit undo86.132.135.23 (talk) Revert. Slander. Also put it into my ArbCom evidence.Next edit → | ||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
| ::Still, take it to an admin or something, don't remove or modify what they've put, even if they've done it while banned. That's no better than their actions. I mean, yeah, they're banned. I can understand just speed-reverting stuff a banned user adds to a page(they're banned!), but insted your making modifications to what they've said as far as I could tell looking at history and the edit summaries. Thats one of those 'not a good idea' things. Esspecially not on an arbcom case on yourself. There's lots of admin noticeboards and whatnot to take this to. ] 04:03, 14 June 2006 (UTC) | ::Still, take it to an admin or something, don't remove or modify what they've put, even if they've done it while banned. That's no better than their actions. I mean, yeah, they're banned. I can understand just speed-reverting stuff a banned user adds to a page(they're banned!), but insted your making modifications to what they've said as far as I could tell looking at history and the edit summaries. Thats one of those 'not a good idea' things. Esspecially not on an arbcom case on yourself. There's lots of admin noticeboards and whatnot to take this to. ] 04:03, 14 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ==Warring== | |||
| ==Threat by Leyasu using an anon== | |||
| ===Warning=== | |||
| Seriously, you might want to stop warring with me. Ive showed yew time and time again people do not win wars with me. And remember this, im violatin policys to prove a point. Your violating them and digging yourself a deeper hole. Ill offer yew this advice one more time, dont let my actions denote yours; yew have a problem with what i do, try talking about it on my talk page - coz warring with me is going to achieve yew nothing, as yew act like me being banned from using an accout on this thing is the end of my world, it isnt. 04:36, 14 June 2006 (UTC) ] | Seriously, you might want to stop warring with me. Ive showed yew time and time again people do not win wars with me. And remember this, im violatin policys to prove a point. Your violating them and digging yourself a deeper hole. Ill offer yew this advice one more time, dont let my actions denote yours; yew have a problem with what i do, try talking about it on my talk page - coz warring with me is going to achieve yew nothing, as yew act like me being banned from using an accout on this thing is the end of my world, it isnt. 04:36, 14 June 2006 (UTC) ] | ||
Revision as of 04:40, 14 June 2006
You have new messages (last change).Old messages will be archived once read, thanks.
Note - Automated bots are not welcome on my talkpage, I consider edits by bots to be spam and will be deleted.
Re: Hmm
Wow; thanks for the heads up. This has been going on for about a week now; see this edit. I've also posted about this on WP:AE and Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for arbitration/Deathrocker. It's getting harder and harder to assume good faith about him; if the anons are merely impersonating Leyasu, that's unfortunate. But I'm pretty sure that they're really him.
I really wish that the arbcom would have passed some findings of fact about Leyasu's editing while blocked since it did also happen on an earlier, separate occasion; it really frustrates me that they're not putting more time into this case.
--Idont Havaname (Talk) 20:44, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
Motörhead
You know every time I see their "genre" change I'm tempted to replace whatever with "Really REALLY loud Rock 'n' Roll" ;) --Alf 16:05, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
Haha... that may be correct, I think that is how Lemmy himself refers to the band. - Deathrocker 16:43, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
Warning about edit summaries
Please try to avoid making harsh statements in edit summaries; these can be interpreted as personal attacks, whether intended or not. Ral315 (talk) 06:38, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
Reguarding your edits to Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Deathrocker/Evidence
As stated by the evidence page, do not remove or attempt to modify the evidence posted by other users in sections established by them. Kevin_b_er 03:51, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
- If yew want to get hold of me, drop a message on my Accounts talk page. If yew wanna discuss the arbcom case, do it on the arbcom cases talk page. If yew want to say something about me, drop it in your evidence. But do not vandalise my evidence or attempt to block me from posting it, because i will use it in my evidence in one manner or another. Leyasu1 03:55, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
- Yew post in my evidence, thats vandalism. Your lucky im even considerate enough with yew to move it to your own evidence so that you can better organise it, rather than just delete it out right. Leyasu1 04:00, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
- Try looking at the top of the page; If you disagree with some evidence you see here, please cite the evidence in your own section and provide counter-evidence, or an explanation of why the evidence is misleading. Do not edit within the evidence section of any other user. You vandalise my evidence, i will remove it. Understand? Leyasu1 04:05, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
Import from User talk:Kevin Breitenstein
- Hello, the user User:Leyasu is evading a three month block to edit the article, he had blanked by evidence on the page using an anon to cover his tracks, blocked users aren't allowed to edit articles as per blocking policy it stated such edits are viable for removal (plus I am reverting blanking) _ Deathrocker 03:54, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
- Still, take it to an admin or something, don't remove or modify what they've put, even if they've done it while banned. That's no better than their actions. I mean, yeah, they're banned. I can understand just speed-reverting stuff a banned user adds to a page(they're banned!), but insted your making modifications to what they've said as far as I could tell looking at history and the edit summaries. Thats one of those 'not a good idea' things. Esspecially not on an arbcom case on yourself. There's lots of admin noticeboards and whatnot to take this to. Kevin_b_er 04:03, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
Warring
Seriously, you might want to stop warring with me. Ive showed yew time and time again people do not win wars with me. And remember this, im violatin policys to prove a point. Your violating them and digging yourself a deeper hole. Ill offer yew this advice one more time, dont let my actions denote yours; yew have a problem with what i do, try talking about it on my talk page - coz warring with me is going to achieve yew nothing, as yew act like me being banned from using an accout on this thing is the end of my world, it isnt. 04:36, 14 June 2006 (UTC) Ley Shade