| Revision as of 04:28, 14 June 2006 editCoat of Arms (talk | contribs)828 edits vote← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:43, 15 June 2006 edit undoAnomaly1 (talk | contribs)175 edits →[]Next edit → | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| *'''Support'''. Nice read. ] 19:43, 13 June 2006 (UTC) | *'''Support'''. Nice read. ] 19:43, 13 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Support'''. Excellent article. —<font face="Lucida Blackletter"><font color="black">] <small>(])</small></font></font> 04:28, 14 June 2006 (UTC) | *'''Support'''. Excellent article. —<font face="Lucida Blackletter"><font color="black">] <small>(])</small></font></font> 04:28, 14 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Support'''. Well done and interesting article. ] 01:43, 15 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:43, 15 June 2006
Chromatophore
I'd like to nominate this for a featured article, as i feel it meets the content requirement and is a fascinating subject that people ask about time and time again at the science reference desk. I guess it is a self nom, as i have provided most of the material over a period of many months, after setting myself a challenge to make a featured article from a stub. I have made efforts for peer review, and have had some excellent advice from both scientists and copyeditors that i have tried to incorporate. I hope it has been enough, if not i'd appreciate your constructive criticism to reach my goal. Rockpocket 04:21, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
- Commment The 'and' here seems out of place and awkward: "containing and light reflecting" Rlevse 10:10, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
- Fixed, I believe. Anville 20:06, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
- Ah yes, I get it now; before I it made me think a word was missing or the and should not be there. Support now.Rlevse 13:33, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
- Fixed, I believe. Anville 20:06, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support. Nice job. Rlevse 13:33, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support. Fits FA criteria, nicely written article. — Wackymacs 17:21, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support. Jeronimo 17:48, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support. I couldn't resist doing a little copy editing, but that's just me. (-: Anville 20:06, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks for the copyediting, much appreciated. Rockpocket 21:39, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support nicely well done Jaranda 03:37, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support per all above. Anonymous_Anonymous 12:56, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support: Very well done and as readable as biochemistry and morphology can be (barring car chases and explosions, of course). Geogre 14:59, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
- Note to Self: find a way to work car chases and explosions into my next FA nomination. Anville 16:13, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support. Nice read. Themillofkeytone 19:43, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support. Excellent article. —Coat of Arms (talk) 04:28, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support. Well done and interesting article. Anomaly1 01:43, 15 June 2006 (UTC)