| Revision as of 23:51, 15 June 2006 editSon of Somebody (talk | contribs)1,345 editsm self-deception← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:05, 16 June 2006 edit undoSon of Somebody (talk | contribs)1,345 edits rhetoric, obfuscationNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| '''Intellectual dishonesty''' is the advocacy of a position known to be false. ] is misused to advance an ] or to reinforce one's deeply held ] in the face of overwhelming contrary ]. |
'''Intellectual dishonesty''' is the advocacy of a position known to be false. ] is misused to advance an ] or to reinforce one's deeply held ] in the face of overwhelming contrary ]. | ||
| The terms ''intellectually dishonest'' and ''intellectual dishonesty'' are often used as rhetorical devices in a debate; the label invariably frames an opponent in a negative light. It is an ] way to say "''you're lying''". | |||
| ==See also== | ==See also== | ||
| * In specific fields: | * In specific fields: | ||
Revision as of 00:05, 16 June 2006
Intellectual dishonesty is the advocacy of a position known to be false. Rhetoric is misused to advance an agenda or to reinforce one's deeply held beliefs in the face of overwhelming contrary evidence.
The terms intellectually dishonest and intellectual dishonesty are often used as rhetorical devices in a debate; the label invariably frames an opponent in a negative light. It is an obfuscatory way to say "you're lying".
See also
- In specific fields:
- Plagiarism
- Honesty
- Ethics
- Epistemic virtue
- Scientific skepticism
- Scientism
- Rigour
- Anti-intellectualism
- Self-deception
- Truthiness
 | This philosophy-related article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |