Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 19:28, 31 December 2013

WP:RETENTION

This editor is willing to lend a helping hand. Just ask.

In brief, the majority of the Big Trees of California, certainly the best of them, are owned by people who have every right, and in many cases every intention, to cut them into lumber. Page 8, Summer-1900, A Report on the Big Trees of California

Archives

Template:Multicol 2008 March April May June August September October November December 2009 January February March April May June July August September October November Template:Multicol-break Template:Multicol-end

THIS IS A BLOCK FREE and a DON'T HASSLE MY COMPANY ZONE

This talk page is a 'BLOCK FREE' Zone. Any previous bans or other editor restrictions are rescinded and no longer enforcable. Blatant and obvious (although, who's to say what's obvious) acts of in-civility will not be tolerated. They will, however, not be punishable.

Co-operation is a learned skill

versaries. The “back and forth” between editors MUST be congenial. For generations, writers of all kinds have corresponded. In order to maintain a working relationship they rarely, if ever, attacked each other. We do not create articles or edit them in isolation. By "Leave the room" I don't mean back down....just "back up". When you stumble upon a hornets nest, you don't keep hitting it. You back up...for your own well-being. The hornets are not going to change. They like being hornets. You tried ANI. Neither of you are satisfied with the results. But many editors and admins saw what happened and will file it in their memory. I don't like bullies/hornets any more than you two do. I just have learned not to get stung. The article isn't going anywhere. Watch it and wait for com-patriots. WP editing should be enjoyable, not aggravating. ```Buster Seven Talk 08:14, 17 August 2012 (UTC) Reply to Ihardlythinkso (talk) 09:02, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

There are many jobs at the Zoo. And Many Many happy workers. Pick a job that needs doing. And be happy. Leaving the Zoo is always an option. I love this Zoo. Maybe that's the difference. What you call "zoo" is just one of the hundreds (or is it hundreds of thousands) of enviroments here. I would suggest you leave the zoo and find an environment more condusive to your greatness. Or stay in the zoo and be fretful and unhappy. ``Buster Seven Talk 09:19, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

crap

Don't drink too much . Always rermember to have a ```Buster Seven Talk 21:47, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

To modify something

To modify something you wrote, the way to do it is to use the <ins> and <del> tags. For example, if you wrote this: "The sun is cold." and you wanted to correct it in a Talk page conversation, you should do it like this: "The sun is <del>cold</del> <ins>hot</ins>." The result looks like this: "The sun is cold hot." That is the accepted way to do it.```Buster Seven Talk 05:46, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

CVUA Test 1

Please answer these questions about Vandalism and let me know when you are done. You don't need to give a long answer. Thanks!

1. Please briefly describe what vandalism is.

   A: Vandalism is any addition, removal, or change of content in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Misplaced Pages. Some examples of typical vandalism are adding obscenities and crude humor to a page, illegitimately blanking pages, and inserting obvious nonsense into a page.

2. Am I allowed to get in an edit war while reverting vandalism?

   A: No. Reporting the vandal to an administrator is a better solution.

   Technically, you are. But yes, seeking a sysop is much better.

   Good to know that but edit warring kind of plays in the vandals desire to play a game. To me, vandalism is a kids game that I'd rather not play.

3. What should I do after I spot vandalism? (3 steps)

   A: 1) Make sure it really IS vandalism rather than an innocent mistake, 2)Revert the vandalism by viewing the page's history and selecting the most recent version of the page prior to the vandalism, 3) Warn the vandal with the appropriate warning template.

4. Please list 3 ways how to spot vandalism.

   A: 1) Keeping an eye on your own watchlist for suspicious edits, 2) checking the "user contribution" page of an identified vandal to discover other vandalous acts,

   And the third? :]

   Oooopps!! 3)Scanning "recent changes", looking for large changes or likely culprits. Some wild goose chasing but working toward increasing an ability to spot vandals.

5. If an entire article is vandalism, what should you do?

   A: Request Speedy Deletion by adding one of the speedy deletion templates.

6. Is making test edits considered vandalism?

   A: No. Users sometimes edit pages as an experiment. Such edits, while prohibited, are treated differently from vandalism. These users should be warned using the uw-test series of user warning templates, or by a talk page message including, if appropriate, a welcome and referral to the Misplaced Pages sandbox, where they can continue to make test edits without being unintentionally disruptive. Registered users can also create their own sandboxes as a user subpage. If a user has made a test edit and then reverted it, consider placing the message Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead, as someone could see your test before you revert it. Thank you., on their talk page.

— ΛΧΣ 17:32, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Nice. I've left some follow-ups. — ΛΧΣ 01:59, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

CVUA Assignment 2

User:Hahc21/CVUA/Buster7

Nice answers to the first test, here is your second assignment :]

Assignment:

• Read WP:Cleaning up vandalism and WP:WARN.
• Find two users or IPs you'd warn for vandalism, including the diffs of their vandal behaviour.
• Explain which template you'd give to two of them.

Cheers. — ΛΧΣ 12:57, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

• IPVandal #1---- I would use a level 1 warning. Having said that, I just checked his recent contributions and found this which he did at the same article a month ago and this vandalism he also did about a month ago. This shows that I should investigate a bit first before deciding on the level of warning to be issued. I have issued a level3 warning and reported to WP:AIV. ```Buster Seven Talk 19:50, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

• This is silly. I just now realized that I have Twinkle and can use it to warn and report.
• I'm travelling this week-end. Will find #2 when I get back. TC. ```Buster Seven Talk 19:55, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

• IPVandal #2---- Again, a level one warning. It is the only action, so far, by this user. While a bit crude, it seems childish. A Template:uw-test2 was issued by User:Materialscientist. ```Buster Seven Talk 05:38, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

• Great! Yes, you can use Twinkle hehe, and you forgot to ping me ;) I will be handling the second test tomorrow morning (my time). — ΛΧΣ 03:20, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

CVUA Test 2

Please answer the following questions

1. Why should new users be given level 1 warnings when possible?

   A: A level 1 warning is the least "aggressive" warning. It is a gentle caution used for unconstructive edits. Hopefully it wakes the new editor up without the accusation of vandalism.

2. What level(s), if vandalism persists after the warning, can a user be reported to AIV and blocked for disruptive editing for vandalizing

   A: Levels 3 and 4. Level 3 warns that if the vandalism continues you "may" be blocked. Level 4 makes it clear that if acts of vandalism continue you WILL be blocked.

3. What level warning(s) mention that an editor could be blocked?

   A: Levels 3 and 4.

Please name which edit warning you would issue to a user in the following scenarios

1. A new user blanking sections.

   A: {{uw-test1}} or {{uw-delete1}}. Due to the possibility of unexplained good-faith content removal, blanking should not necessarily be considered vandalism. Conversely, some blanking is obviously vandalism (a whole article, for instance) and should be reverted and the editor warned with level 3 or 4.

2. Nonsense/Repeating characters.

   A: This may be just a test edit by a new editor. Level 1.

3. Replacing an article with obscenities.

   A: Using obscenities is a conscious thought and act by the vandalizing editor. It is not a mistake and it should have serious consequences. At least a Level 3 warning.

4. How should vandalism be reverted (without Rollback)?

   A: Use "Un-do" to revert the vandalism. If not possible because of subsequent edits, revert by deleting the vandalism and returning the article to its pre-vandalism state taking into consideration edits that followed it.

5. Should section blanking-edits be reverted?

   A: Yes, of course. Whenever a negative change is discovered any editor should revert back to the last good or quality edit.

6. Should test edits be reverted?

   A: Yes, of course. They are like litter and should be removed just as a clean-up of the article. They most likely are not vandalism. a Level 1 warning should do.

7. What is the difference between a test edit and vandalism?

   A:A test edit is usually an experiment by a novice editor that either doesnt know how to remove it or just forgets to remove it. It's innocent and un-intentional. Vandalism is a conscious attack of the pages of the encyclopedia. It can be considerable or minor, but the vandal knows what he is doing.

Your second test :) — ΛΧΣ 03:30, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

• User:Hahc21.  Done. ```Buster Seven Talk 05:03, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Great answers! Your third assignment will be here soon :] — ΛΧΣ 14:23, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Assignment 3

Assignment:

1. Read WP:BLOCK and WP:GAIV.
2. Find a user that you think could be blocked for vandalism.

Fallentvd seems to fit the bill. His blanking of the page and then inserting new edits in a completely non-Misplaced Pages format seems to be more than just innocent religious fanaticism (if religious fanaticism can ever be innocent).

1. Find a user you'd report at WP:AIV for vandalism.

69.67.144.105 At various articles, he blanks complete sections, blanks the reference thread, and adds personal dribble into articles.

Cheers. — ΛΧΣ 03:31, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

User:Hahc21. Ping. Ping. Assignment 3 is done. ```Buster Seven Talk 21:57, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

|

User:Buster7/Sandbox- Westside Montessori, Toledo

I ran across this page while leaving a message for John from Idegon, and I just had one comment — if I remember rightly, the Old Central Post Office (image) had a Montessori school in connection with its preschool when I visited the site last March, so you might want to check to see whether the two are related. Nyttend (talk) 03:15, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Irving, Irving...are you here, Irving?

Hi, Buster: Looking pretty good. Still needs work tho. The section titled school district is unreferenced mostly. I would just lose the stuff on the scholarships. Maybe keep the $22 million if you can ref it, but definitely lose the National merit thing. That isn't really a big deal...my grad class got 15. the library award should be referenced.

Most importantly, the demographics must be referenced. If the districts website don't have it, there are websites that have it. I will have to look and I really don't have time today...coordinating a community thanksgiving feast.3

Lastly, we don't use titles (?...do you mean in the infobox .....Dr. Dana T. Bedden.... ) and we don't use the flag icon on school articles  Done.

Sorry I can't really look that close today, but i will revisit it when I can. John from Idegon (talk) 18:11, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

MOS says that when we name people we do not use titles (except for military and heraldic, and then only the first instance in an article), unless the person has a sexually ambiguous name like francis. We also do not use middle initials unless they are needed for clarity, and in the body of the article (not in infobox or captions) we use the whole name the first time and just the last after that. Basically the same as the AP stylebook. John from Idegon (talk) 22:02, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

The chief gives you the bird brings you dinner, mate! Have a wonderful holiday with your family. May the cheer and spirit of this wonderful holiday of sharing and thankfulness fill your spirit with joy! John from Idegon (talk) 23:08, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Happy Thanksgiving!

Hey Buster!

I just wanted to wish you and your family a Happy Thanksgiving! I hope you have a good holiday with all the trimmings. Zaereth (talk) 22:38, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

• Thanks, Zaereth. Same to you and yours. Take it easy on the "Wild Turkey". ```Buster Seven Talk 22:44, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

A turkey for you!

AutomaticStrikeout (₵) has given you a turkey! Turkeys promote WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a turkey, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy Thanksgiving! ~~~~ Spread the goodness of turkey by adding {{subst:Thanksgiving Turkey}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

STiki

It's easy. After you download the file you unzip it. Then the executable file there, which you can move to your desktop or wherever, is what you click on to activate STiki. You plug in your user name and PW and that's it. The rest is self-explanatory. The trick is not how to use it but when to stop using it. I find that when I get dizzy I know I've been using it too much. Coretheapple (talk) 19:00, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

I assume you're familiar with the various options. Reading from bottom to top: you can ignore the edit on your screen (Innocent), you can pass the ball to another user (Pass), you can revert it as a Good Faith edit (with various options for a message to the user, including no message), and you can revert it as Vandalism. Usually I don't issue a warning, as for the most part vandals are children and a warning would just encourage them. But your mileage may vary.

Using STiKi for a while, you get a sense about the vast amount of vandalism going on at all times, as well as the strange assortment of trivia that warrants Misplaced Pages articles. Coretheapple (talk) 19:26, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

By the way, the STiKi people frown on use of the "pass" option, as it seems to put a burden on the system or something like that, I'm not clear why. Coretheapple (talk) 19:27, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

"My zipper is stuck!". Is there a free (no cost) way to unzip this file? Right now Im being offered a deal at $24.95. ```Buster Seven Talk 19:40, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, that's annoying. I use 7-Zip, which is free and also can pack as well as unpack. http://www.7-zip.org/ Coretheapple (talk) 19:58, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Project page (aka, Petra canvassing again!!!)

Hi there Buster,

Thank you for yet another friendly note of support. We do get kicked in the ankles a lot around here, and every once in a while, an 'atta boy' can do wonders.

I wondered if you could give me some advice. I have a project I need to put together so that various editors can work together, but I want to keep it very simple for now, so that we aren't mired in talk but rather can get straight to work in article space. This project is to review recent edits made by a team with a stated POV to a whole slew of articles. The edits need to be reviewed, and each section then researched/fact-checked and re-done accordingly. So the work is enormous, and I think the best way forward is to stay very organized and very simple. If editors want to help with the project, I want the process to be very smooth. We all have limited time, and this isn't going to be fun to begin with. A streamlined Project Page could be the key to success.

Can you help me with this? I ask because you seem well-versed in these pages. Thanks a million! petrarchan47tc 17:31, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Sure, Petra. I would be glad to help in any way I can. Afterall, I'm just your ordinary WikiCitizen with a surplus of time and enthusiasm. Let me know via e-mail what you have in mind. ```Buster Seven Talk 06:50, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

The Misplaced Pages Library Survey

As a subscriber to one of The Misplaced Pages Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi 15:45, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

ping

Hello Buster, assigned you some WP:REQUIRED duties over here.

Uh-oh. Aaaah! Reading WP:REQUIRED again, it says you can skip 'em.  :-)

User_talk:Mark_Miller#WP:WER_op-ed

Thanks for improving wikipedia. 74.192.84.101 (talk) 04:33, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Days of the year

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Days of the year. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Misplaced Pages:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Follow-up

Buster, I'm calling it like it is. It's all too easy for folks to hide behind a computer screen and behave insensitively to each other. Like I say, I have never experienced anything like this before in the writing arena, ever. To say that someone is simply doing their job in what was done with this article reflects the need for better policies on Misplaced Pages. I have never experienced anyone to make such sweeping changes, at any time throughout my career in writing, without first consulting with the writers. To do so is a professional courtesy that I see is not followed here. That's not the way it's done here on Misplaced Pages, as I see now, but that doesn't mean its right or that such behavior can't be improved. You all have left me nearly in tears; such conduct leaves much to be desired. The teachable moment was lost on everyone involved. Daniellagreen (talk) 23:40, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

This new editor has not been hardened to the WP editing process. New editors respond poorly to the Pain of Loss. To them losing their article/entry/edit and all the hard work involved is monumental and crushing. It is their "baby" and mean people are harming it. ```Buster Seven Talk 16:38, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

BP RfC

I sent messages to those who responded to the last RfC unless they ware currently active on the page. I intend to contact all recent editors in the future. Martin Hogbin (talk) 10:32, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. ```Buster Seven Talk 21:52, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Email

Rivertorch (talk) 12:19, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Replied. ```Buster Seven Talk 15:41, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Sam Hoyt

Hi Buster, I'm thinking that you may be able to assist with this issue in regard to the Sam Hoyt article. If you could when you have a moment, please take a look at the article, as well as the talk page with my comments. This article could use some protection from the libelous information that has continued to be included within it throughout the years. Thanks, Daniellagreen (talk) 21:17, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Sorry. Too busy with other projects. ```Buster Seven Talk 23:36, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

@ Daniellagreen. You might check out WP:PP and familiarize yourself with the Misplaced Pages Protection policy. ```Buster Seven Talk 07:05, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

RE: Eddy

Please comment on Talk:Gun control

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Gun control. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Misplaced Pages:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Help please

Buster, would you take a look at the edit history of the editor that has added to the BP talk page (at the bottom) and many others that are related to energy. S/he has been adding copies of this edit to articles because s/he "needs to know" about sustainability issues. IMO, it is improper editing and should be deleted. Thoughts? Gandydancer (talk) 17:31, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

(stalker) I've seen this on other oil company's pages as well. Seems easy to ignore, but perhaps it should be addressed? petrarchan47tc 22:20, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

YAh! I looked at them (a lot of them) earlier today b4 Christmas shopping. It could be improper editing, as Gandy points out, but at this stage I'm not sure it's worth the investment of time. What I'll do is watchlist all the articles with the canvassing-type "need to know" and see what kind of response Editor Tim generates. ```Buster Seven Talk 00:52, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Of the 19 articles he canvassed, he has received zero response. ```Buster Spade (talk) 13:17, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

I did not look at them all, but I figured as much--after all, how exactly would one respond? Thanks for keeping it on your radar. Gandydancer (talk) 20:05, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Gandy. So far there has been ---ZERO--- response. Happy New Year!! ```Buster Seven Talk 01:54, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

CVUA Test 3

;Please answer the following questions:

1. Which is the difference between being disruptive and being a vandal?

1. A: An editor can be disruptive by being un-civil. Edit warring is disruptive but it is not vandalism. An editor can be disruptive by not accepting consensus when it is achieved. An editor can be disruptive by taking a conversation completely off-topic and thereby "disrupting" the natural problem-solving environment necessary to edit. But these are not acts of vandalism. Even if misguided, willfully against consensus, or disruptive, good-faith efforts to improve the encyclopedia are not vandalism. Mislabelling good-faith edits as vandalism can be considered harmful. Intentionally making abusive edits to Misplaced Pages is considered vandalism and will eventually lead to a block. A judgment call needs to be made: What is the INTENT of the offending editor?

1. Deleting comments from other user's talk pages can be considered vandalism?

   A:Adding insults, profanity, etc. to user pages or user talk pages is vandalism. Extremely offensive material may be removed on sight by any editor and the act of removal should not be considered vandalism. While editors do not own their User and Talk pages, there is an unspoken respect for another editors domain. It does happen that one editor will ban or prohibit another editor from commenting/editing on "my talk page". In these cases repeated incursion by the unwelcome visitor might be considered vandalism. WP:Userpage

2. The removal of sourced content can be considered as vandalism? WP:Verifiability

   A: It "can" be vandalism but most times (?) it is innocent. There can be situations where the reference does not truly verify the information or where the current reference has become outdated and needs to be replaced with more current info or where the reference is now a dead link. Material that fails verification may be tagged or removed. Any editor who removes verification has an obligation to articulate specific problems that would justify its exclusion from Misplaced Pages.

3. A violation of the three-revert rule should be reported to AIV?

   A: Violations of the three-revert rule should be reported to the Administrators' noticeboard/3RR page. AIV/Administrator intervention against vandalism is for reporting users currently engaging in persistent, clear vandalism.

4. Are IPs blocked indefinitely for vandalism?

   A: IP addresses cannot be considered vandalism-only accounts, as IP addresses are sometimes shared by many devices (by way of network address translation or a proxy server), and many are reassigned to another computer after a period of time. However, if an IP address has been used only or mostly for vandalism over a long period of time, it is often included in Category:IP addresses used for vandalism. These IP addresses may be subject to very long blocks, up to a year and occasionally even longer, but are almost never blocked indefinitely.

;Please state which of the next situations require a block or any other action

1. An IP blanking a page

   A:

2. A user replacing a page's content with "Im the queen u hoes!"

   A:

3. A user leaving a blatant personal attack in an article

   A:

4. A (recently autoconfirmed) user deleting the contents of the Administrator's noticeboard

   A:

;Please state which of the following usernames are inappropriate or blockable, and why. WP:Username

1. LadyGagaSuckMyD

   A: Inappropriate and in bad taste. Condones un-civil behavior. While not explicite, still is obviously intended to be crude and insensitive to fellow editors. Blockable

2. The Dick of The East

   A: Not so obviously offensive. If it were just "Dick of the East" it might be OK but "The" adds a sexuality that may be offensive to some. Also, "The Dick" could refer to abusive, aggressive, anti-social intentions on the part of the editor so named. WP:Don't be a dick comes to mind. .

3. Arse Nal

   A: "Arse" is generally considered the socially acceptable way to say, "Ass". More humorous than harmful or inappropriate.

4. TheGreatestVandalOnEarth

   A: This Username advocates, encourages, and condones vandalism. Blockable

5. Push My Tongue

   A: I don't see this username as inappropriate, per se. I get the sexual connotation but it may be remote enough to be allowable. Not sure.

6. Big Rape

   A: This Username will generally be seen as having the same effect as condoning the behavior (rape). Blockable

Good luck! — ΛΧΣ 21:21, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Alternate account?

Hi, Buster7: is Buster Spade an alternate account? If so, it would be helpful to label it as such, using an edit from your Buster7 account. If you're seeking to change the name of your account, you can see Misplaced Pages's instructions on requesting this. isaacl (talk) 13:38, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Hey Isaac. Yes, it is an alternate acct I set up just to create a separate watchlist for about 20 Petroleum company article that were canvassed. I didn't want to clutter my already cluttered watchlist here. I will make a note there about it being an "Alternate Acct of Buster7". Happy Holidays. ```Buster Seven Talk 14:10, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Holiday Cheer

		Holiday Cheer
		Michael Q. Schmidt is wishing you Season's Greetings! This message celebrates the holiday season, promotes WikiLove, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and aHappy New Year, whether it be someone with whom you had disagreements in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings. - MQS

You're invited: Art & Feminism Edit-a-thon

Oh by golly...

...have a holly, jolly Christmas --this year! Hey Buster, I just wanted to wish you a Merry Christmas before I sign off for the holidays. I hope you had a good Thanksgiving. It's been really hectic around my house, because we're getting ready for the dogs to have pups, so there hasn't been much time for relaxing. I'm looking forward to a few weeks off. Anyhow, I hope you and your family all have a great Christmas and a wonderful New Year! Zaereth (talk) 01:34, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Re: "Employee X"

Thought you'd find this interesting petrarchan47tc 04:20, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

• Also interesting!```Buster Seven Talk 17:22, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Oh yeah! I saw that. It's hard to keep up with these guys. Also, Happy Christmas to you and yours. Thank you for being such a good friend to us "little guys" and to the Pedia. petrarchan47tc 07:53, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Yo Ho Ho

ϢereSpielChequers is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec13}} to your friends' talk pages.

Disambiguation link notification for December 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Araria district, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paddy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Jim Walton

Plz ce Jim Walton --Aparnaji_Talk 05:31, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement

A typical Nepali meal Hello, Buster7. The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Meal Previous selections: Recorded history • Micronesia Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Nominate an article Review nominations Have your say in future selections Posted by: Northamerica1000 22:42, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Thomas Jefferson

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Thomas Jefferson. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Misplaced Pages:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Nadolig Llawen a Blwyddyn Newydd Dda!

For your Christmas collection of greetings! Deb (talk) 17:28, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Felice Navidad!

All the best for a terrific New Year. Coretheapple (talk) 21:31, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Seeking Your Help

I need your help with regard to user:Czar and his/her deletions on two pages; Dix Hills, NY and Todd Baker. First, on the Todd Baker page, Czar has changed an administrator's earlier deletion of unnecessary tags. This happened as a result of a high school class adding Mr. Baker to the notable residents section of the Dix Hills page. We have been asked by Czar to provide better attributions, which we have. Although this does not satisfy Czar, we are willing to continue adding more that might be deemed more acceptable. However, Czar has resorted to hostile dialogue and it seems he/she cannot continue to function in a non-objective manner. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1001:B104:527C:5945:120:86D:B880 (talk) 23:16, 28 December 2013 (UTC)