Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/DMB112: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:01, 1 January 2014 editJohnInDC (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers27,304 edits Created page with '{{subst:SPI report |checkuser=no <!-- Please do not enter anything in the subject/headline box! If you want to request checkuser, simply change the line above t...'  Revision as of 21:05, 1 January 2014 edit undoDMB112 (talk | contribs)1,641 edits Comments by other usersNext edit →
Line 19: Line 19:
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small> <small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small>


It is mine. Had I wanted to hide, I wouldn't have left my signature. My bad. ] (]) 21:05, 1 January 2014 (UTC)


======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== ======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>======

Revision as of 21:05, 1 January 2014

DMB112

DMB112 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/DMB112/Archive.


01 January 2014

– This SPI case is open.

Suspected sockpuppets


User:DMB112 was blocked for 2 weeks beginning December 16 for edit warring. RedPill1785 was created on December 21 and edited a variety of academic-related articles, an area on which DMB112 also concentrates. Today RedPill1785 made an edit to Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject College football, here. A few moments later, DMB112 - whose block expired on December 30 - edited RedPill1875's comment to substitute his own signature, here. I am not requesting a CU as I think there is no other explanation for this sequence of events than puppetry and block evasion. JohnInDC (talk) 21:01, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

It is mine. Had I wanted to hide, I wouldn't have left my signature. My bad. DMB112 (talk) 21:05, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Categories: