| Revision as of 20:04, 2 January 2014 editQuackGuru (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users79,978 edits Uninvolved editors might think you are still questioning whether it is COATHOOK. You wrote: What is the potential WP:COATHOOK and/or WP:WEIGHT problem? See Talk:German acupuncture trials#Threaded discussion. The RFC will determine the outcome.← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:37, 3 January 2014 edit undoMiddle 8 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users8,217 edits could you address this? thanksNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == GERAC continued == | |||
| While I don't object to the simpler wording at GERAC, I've never understood why GERAC is supposedly COATHOOK-like. Why not just answer my questions at Talk:GERAC? It would help other editors understand too, I think, and we could wrap up the RfC faster. thanks --] (]) 15:37, 3 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:37, 3 January 2014
GERAC continued
Re our last exchange here While I don't object to the simpler wording at GERAC, I've never understood why GERAC is supposedly COATHOOK-like. Why not just answer my questions at Talk:GERAC? It would help other editors understand too, I think, and we could wrap up the RfC faster. thanks --Middle 8 (talk) 15:37, 3 January 2014 (UTC)