Misplaced Pages

User talk:QuackGuru: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:00, 3 January 2014 editQuackGuru (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users79,978 edits I did comment at the RFC.← Previous edit Revision as of 19:44, 3 January 2014 edit undoMiddle 8 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users8,217 edits ns: Why is GERAC a supposed WP:COATRACK? Take a moment to explain this, please, or let it goNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
==Why is GERAC a supposed WP:COATRACK? Take a moment to explain this, please, or let it go==

Quackguru, I just asked you (again) on this page why you think ] is a ]. You just wrote in your ES -- which is all I have to go by since you refuse to leave anything on this page -- this non-answer: "." No, they sure haven't. Or on the off chance that I've missed it. So I'm asking you to explain it, briefly, in a sentence or two. See ], bottom of RfC discussion.

What's so hard about this? I'd me more than happy to let it go, but you keep bringing it up, so apparently it's important to you for some reason. Giving non-answers is ] and poor ]. And I'm not joining any consensus that agrees GERAC is a coatrack. Just answer already, or stop bringing it up, please. --] (]) 19:44, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:44, 3 January 2014

Why is GERAC a supposed WP:COATRACK? Take a moment to explain this, please, or let it go

Quackguru, I just asked you (again) on this page why you think GERAC is a WP:COATRACK. You just wrote in your ES -- which is all I have to go by since you refuse to leave anything on this page -- this non-answer: "Editors have already explained what is pure coatrack at the GERAC talk page." No, they sure haven't. Or on the off chance that I've missed it. So I'm asking you to explain it, briefly, in a sentence or two. See Talk:GERAC, bottom of RfC discussion.

What's so hard about this? I'd me more than happy to let it go, but you keep bringing it up, so apparently it's important to you for some reason. Giving non-answers is WP:IDHT and poor WP:DR. And I'm not joining any consensus that agrees GERAC is a coatrack. Just answer already, or stop bringing it up, please. --Middle 8 (talk) 19:44, 3 January 2014 (UTC)