Revision as of 09:14, 4 January 2014 editRetrohead (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users11,003 editsm →Justice← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:44, 4 January 2014 edit undoTeflon Peter Christ (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers140,333 edits Detroit Metro Times sourceNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{nowrap|{{Statustop|offset=450}}}} | |||
{{quote|For over 20 years now, Ornette Coleman has been a major innovative force in world music. During this period Coleman has been able to consistently change the direction of his music and still greatly influence other musicians. Ornette has been able to do this in spite of the fact that his massive achievements have often been misunderstood, vilified, ridiculed or patronized by dense white American "music critics." Through it all, Coleman has prevailed because his artistic vision is so clear, strong and compelling that no opposition could stop him. Like most "great masters," Ornette has been forced to fight for his art. | |||
==Barnstar== | |||
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
|rowspan="2" valign="top" | ] | |||
|rowspan="2" | | |||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: bottom; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Hip Hop Award''' | |||
|- | |||
|style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | I, ] (]), award the Hip Hop Award to Dan56 for the amount of work you put into articles concerning Eminem, and want to let you know I appreciate it. Here this Barnstar is for you! ] (]) 21:44, 26 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
That is why Coleman’s latest recording, Of Human Feelings, is such an inspiring triumph. In this record we get an intimate look at a brilliant musician/composer organizing the varied elements of his music into a multi-tonal mosaic of great power, humor, color, wit, sensuality, compassion and tenderness. The fact that Ornette has once again managed to create such intelligent and passionate music using only the most venerable and fundamental of all African-American "forms" (i.e. the Blues) as an aesthetic focus is cause for celebration in a culture that worships gimmicks and cant over vision and heart. It is also an indication that like all truly "great artists," Ornette recognizes and uses the eternal value(s) of simplicity. Of course, as any working artist can tell you, this is one of the most difficult things to do. Luckily for the rest of us, this is Coleman’s strength. | |||
== A barnstar for you! == | |||
In this record, Ornette and his now six-year-old Prime Time Band never lose sight of the essential conceptual and spiritual aspects of Ornette’s musical philosophy: "Play the music, not the background." In the eight pieces on this recording, as in all of Ornette’s music, the emphasis is never on virtuoso pyrotechnics for their own sake, or in empty stylistic phrase mongering. In every composition there is a synergy of thought and feeling that communicates instantly. There is always a dynamic unity of structure and execution that is performed with spirit and expressive animation. Coleman’s intricate and functional knowledge of black creative music tradi tions allows him to do this in a deceptively easy manner. The music literally pours out of this ensemble in strains of melody and rhythm that sums up the last 100 years of creative development in Afro-American music. | |||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Editor's Barnstar''' | |||
|- | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | For your amazing effort on the critical reception of '']''. Keep up good work. ] (]) 03:53, 28 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
This awesome command is augmented, in Coleman’s case, with a very strong emotional affinity for the most ancient and basic "folk musics" developed by black people in the New World. Thus, in this recording there are rocking riff figures, field hollers, intensely lyrical worksongs, roaring call-and-response counterpoint, wailing melodic laments and exultations, wry little stompdown ditties and jumptime rent part be-bopping. There are also multi-rhythmic chants, sound clusters, tonal density and instrumental speechmaking. This colorful tapes try is held together by Coleman’s famous Harmolodic method, a theoretical construct that Ornette devised in the early 1970s to "allow all instruments in the band the equal opportunity to lead at any time..." This means that all members of the band can play melodic lines in any key at any time, because structurally the tempo, the rhythm and the harmonics are all equal in terms of what they can express. There is a constant modulation of tonality and rhythms as a result. In this liberated environmental setting the tonal "jumping-off point" is always the Blues, and I mean all kinds of Blues! | |||
== A barnstar for you! == | |||
Ornette plays every conceivable Blues ever invented and a few that he introduced to the world. In every sound, gesture, cadence and juxtaposition. Coleman reminds us that without the Blues there would be no "jazz," no "rock," no "pop," no "funk," no "punk." In short, no American vernacular music, just bland one-dimensional imitations of European, Asian, Latin and African musics. It is a humbling and sobering thought that makes us reflect even as we dance like mad to the throbbing, driving rhythms. Strangely, despite the echoes of Robert Johnson, Blind Lemon Jefferson, Sonny Boy Williamson, Little Walter, Muddy Waters, B.B. King and Jimi Hendrix (among many others) throughout this music, the overall effect is unlike any Blues you have heard before. This is because of what Coleman does with the form in contemporary terms. | |||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Original Barnstar''' | |||
|- | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thank you for the info regarding the Misplaced Pages style manual. I was using the AP Stylebook regarding punctuation and quotations. I stand corrected and will follow your advice. ] (]) 21:12, 9 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
Meanwhile, Ornette rides the swelling and descending crest of these tidal waves of melody and sound through keening, darting and singing improvisations that convey a very wise and ancient message. This is the eternal blues message of joyful affirmation in the face of adversity and despair. A "heroism" based on hard-won experience and not media posturing. Whether shouting, screaming, moaning, laughing, crying or sighing, the music in Of Human Feelings never fails to express this message that lifts you higher and makes you dance no matter what "the problem." The energy derived from the spirit of this recording is the "solution" to our problems. In fact, the title of one of Ornette’s tunes in this recording is "What is the Name of that Song?" I betcha Reagan doesn’t know. I hope we do.|Kofi Natambu}} | |||
== Your album project == | |||
Hey Dan, sorry for eavesdropping but the article you're writing for the album is awesome! Just wanted to let you know, because it's coming up in my google searches lol. Nice writing! – ] <sup>(] · ])</sup> 02:22, 24 July 2012 (UTC) | |||
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] | |||
|rowspan="2" | | |||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar''' | |||
|- | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For you edits to life is good. ]<sup>] </sup> 03:19, 24 July 2012 (UTC) | |||
|}<!--template:The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar--> | |||
:*Kind of ironic, . ] (]) 03:58, 24 July 2012 (UTC) | |||
== thank u so much! cookie for you! == | |||
]--] ] 02:35, 21 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Thank you == | |||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Music Reviewer Barnstar''' | |||
|- | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | I am so happy to say that "]" is a featured article. Thank you so much for giving a review on a then-stale FAC. All the best and warm wishes, ]] 18:50, 30 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
==Done== | |||
{{User Good Article|Otis Blue: Otis Redding Sings Soul}}{{clear}} | |||
Well done! ''']''' ''']''' 09:47, 5 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
== A barnstar for you! == | |||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Teamwork Barnstar''' | |||
|- | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Hi Dan56! | |||
You've helped me learn more about Misplaced Pages! Teamwork makes the dream work! You're appreciated! ] (]) 04:01, 15 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
==Late Registration== | |||
{{User Good Article|Late Registration}}{{clear}} | |||
Well done. ''']''' ''']''' 11:32, 27 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
==GA Notice== | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%;" | |||
|- | |||
! height=30|<big>] Notice</big> | |||
|- | |||
| align="center" height=100|{{#switch: | |||
|pass=The article ] that you nominated as a ] has passed ]; see the GA review for comments about the article. Well done!<br/><br/>] (]) 04:53, 9 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
|nom = Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article ] that you recently nominated for ]-status according to the ]. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to ] with any questions or comments you might have during this period.<br/><br/>] (]) 04:53, 9 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
|Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article ] in which you've been a major contributor, and has been nominated for ]-status according to the ]. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to ] with any questions or comments you might have during this period.<br/><br/>] (]) 04:53, 9 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
}} | |||
|- | |||
! height=30|] · ] · ] · ] | |||
|- | |||
|} | |||
== A barnstar for you! == | |||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Original Barnstar''' | |||
|- | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Wow! I award you this, original barnstar, for your AMAZING work at getting ] to FA status! It happened oh so fast! I remember looking at the article a few months ago and it was a piece of shit! Great job man! Keep up the great work! <font face="Arial" size="2em"> — ] (], ])</font> 04:00, 6 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Surreal Barnstar''' | |||
|- | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | For your new FA and all the good work on Misplaced Pages! Keep it up... — <span style="text-shadow:#CCC 0.1em 0.3em 0.3em; font-family: Trebuchet MS;font-size: 10pt">]]</span> 21:22, 7 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] | |||
|rowspan="2" | | |||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The ] Barnstar''' | |||
|- | |||
|For your contributions to bring '']'' to Good Article status. Thanks, and keep up the good work! — <font color="#336699" face="Tahoma">]</font><font color="#336699" face="Tahoma"> ]</font> 21:01, 7 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] | |||
|rowspan="2" | | |||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The ] Barnstar''' | |||
|- | |||
|For your contributions to bring '']'' to Good Article status. Thanks, and keep up the good work! — <font color="#336699" face="Tahoma">]</font><font color="#336699" face="Tahoma"> ]</font> 21:27, 7 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] | |||
|rowspan="2" | | |||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The ] Barnstar''' | |||
|- | |||
|Thanks for your work to bring '']'' to Good Article status. Your prolific contributions are much appreciated. -- ] (]) 21:52, 28 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Copyeditor's Barnstar''' | |||
|- | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | For your copyedit of '']'', I award you this barnstar! Thanks so much for the help Dan! <font face="Arial" size="2em"> — ] (], ])</font> 17:42, 18 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] | |||
|rowspan="2" | | |||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The ] Barnstar''' | |||
|- | |||
|For your contributions to bring ] to Good Article status. Thanks, and keep up the good work! -- ] (]) 11:44, 3 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Copyeditor's Barnstar''' | |||
|- | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thank you, thank you, thank you... for the third time with your magic touch on my articles. "]" is a FA, and I appreciate your help there. New request coming soon hehe ;) ! — <span style="text-shadow:#CCC 0.1em 0.3em 0.3em; font-family: Trebuchet MS;font-size: 10pt">]]</span> 16:48, 14 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] | |||
|rowspan="2" | | |||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar''' | |||
|- | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Thank you for helping to fight vandalism by helping to stop unsourced and poorly sourced material being introduced into music articles, which unfortunately can be a big problem on Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 16:32, 31 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
|}<!--template:The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar--> | |||
== Your ] nomination of ]== | |||
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article ] you nominated for ]-status according to the ]. ] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- {{User-multi | |||
|doc=yes | |||
|User=Khazar2 | |||
|1=t | |||
}} 12:21, 25 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] | |||
|rowspan="2" | | |||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The ] Barnstar''' | |||
|- | |||
|For your contributions to bring ] to Good Article status. Keep up the good work--I'm always happy to see more of your stuff in the queue. -- ] (]) 00:58, 26 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
==Advice== | |||
Hello Dan. Since you're kind of more involved in the FA process, can you offer some advice how to nominate articles for that award? Furthermore, an opinion whether ] meets the criteria and what to improve will be welcomed.--] (]) 10:05, 26 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
: I couldn't tell you any more than what's at ]; just to be as prepared as possible, I would recommend either nominating it for GA first or a ], which would make for less things to correct during the FA process. Articles nominated for FA often have had either/or. I'm not too familiar with list articles, but there is a page on featured list critera ]. ] (]) 12:01, 26 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
:: Oh, thanks, that what's I've been looking for. And can you point some similar lists just to see what are the other requirements?--] (]) 12:12, 26 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
::: shows all featured list articles, some of which are award articles, including ], ], and ]. ] (]) 20:51, 26 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
== Scaruffi == | |||
I got the reverts arse about face - sorry! This is why edit summaries are useful, though. ] ] ] 19:32, 30 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
: Kk. ] (]) 19:39, 30 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
==Happy New Year Dan56!== | |||
{| style="border: 4px solid #FFD700; background-color: #FFFAF0;" | |||
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] | |||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; font-family: Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif;" | | |||
:::::::'''''Happy ]!''''' | |||
|- | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 2px solid #ACACAC;" | Hello Dan56:<br>Thanks for all of your contributions to improve the encyclopedia for Misplaced Pages's readers, and have a happy and enjoyable ]! Cheers, ] (]) 05:21, 1 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
<br> | |||
] | |||
<br> | |||
<center><small>Send New Year cheer by adding {{tls|Happy New Year 2014}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.</small></center> | |||
|}</div>{{-}} | |||
I just hope your year of editing ahead will be great!] (]) 05:21, 1 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
== RE: Revolver (Beatles album) == | |||
Hey, sorry about that revert. Didn't realize you already cleaned it up. I just noticed some vandalism that needed to be removed, so I hit "Restore this version", and no edit conflict screen came up. Sorry! Didn't mean it. ''']''' (] | ]) 20:57, 1 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
: No prob. :) ] (]) 20:58, 1 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
== What does accuracy mean? RE: Revolver == | |||
To me accuracy does not mean placing something within an echo chamber that simply parrots how good or bad X or Y is. Accuracy in wikipedia should aim to give a complete overview of a given subject, and not a bias and useless one. It is not intellectually healthy for the mind nor for wikipedia to hide criticism. The beatles are one of my favorite bands and as such they deserve no less. Please stop making edits without opening up to other users and speaking about why. | |||
The encyclopedia of popular music was removed in exchange for a more critical review for multiple reasons: | |||
A. The article mentions the critical source and quotes it by name. | |||
B. The source is more exhaustive in nature than the prior one, as Dan Morrell of the NYT says, "Music magazine editors have few more tried-and-true formulas for boosting newsstand sales and web traffic than best-of lists...vast digests of gathered knowledge and opinion, usually the work of teams of editors, journalists and musicians, painstakingly assembled. But their collaborative efforts pale in comparison to the solo work of Piero Scaruffi." | |||
What this means is that this professor has created an essential encyclopedia without any motivation for capital, e.g. it is a purely academic source. Purely academic sources should take precedent over commercial ones as they have no necessary agenda per se. | |||
AS such, either stop reverting edits or provide better reasoning. | |||
Cheers, | |||
And don't think I care about time spent doing X or Y, such statistics are fabulously pointless. | |||
] (]) 16:08, 2 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
: My dude, Scaruffi is self-published, and your flattering words about his book don't justify your changes. And you have yet to address why you've been reverting my edits in totality. Use the article's talk page, there are other editors participating in the discussion that may be interested in how you're defending your edits, which involve reverting my other improvements to the article. ] (]) 03:09, 3 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
==Justice== | |||
Hey, since you'll probably be my only corespondent, I'll bring it here. The quote ''... gave way to weirdly produced progressive metal on 1988's ...And Justice for All"'' is used as a source to support that the album "features progressive metal music". Unless the entire sentence is provided, this can be considered ]. Moreover, without the entire article from Google Books, this information can't be verified, not to say it could be written out of context. The sentence I cited points to a direct link to the book, so there's no doubt it can be misinterpreted.--] (]) 00:43, 4 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
:By the way, it's useful to link ''Justice'' in the ] article so that readers can easily find it.--] (]) 00:50, 4 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
:: If you use "musically progressive", I don't think you can pipe link "progressive" to "progressive metal". ] (]) 00:51, 4 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
: Also, there's no requirement for urls in a book citation. After all, it is citing a print source. And synthesis involves using two sources to make a conclusion neither make, like "It is white.<sup></sup>" + "It is warm.<sup></sup>" = "It is white and warm.<sup></sup>" Me re-writing "it gave way to weirdly produced progressive metal on..." as "features progressive metal music..." is the same as "...is musically progressive" rewritten as "musically progressive album". The source says there was progressive metal on the album, which doesn't mean the same thing as the album featured progressive metal? ] (]) 00:56, 4 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
::Actually it says "'''...''' gave way to weirdly produced progressive metal". Those "'''...'''" can be "''Justice'' is a hip-hop album that gave way to...", see my point? That's why I'm requiring the entire sentence. I can say "it features X genre" on page Y from the book, but that isn't verifiable.--] (]) 09:13, 4 January 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:44, 4 January 2014
For over 20 years now, Ornette Coleman has been a major innovative force in world music. During this period Coleman has been able to consistently change the direction of his music and still greatly influence other musicians. Ornette has been able to do this in spite of the fact that his massive achievements have often been misunderstood, vilified, ridiculed or patronized by dense white American "music critics." Through it all, Coleman has prevailed because his artistic vision is so clear, strong and compelling that no opposition could stop him. Like most "great masters," Ornette has been forced to fight for his art.
That is why Coleman’s latest recording, Of Human Feelings, is such an inspiring triumph. In this record we get an intimate look at a brilliant musician/composer organizing the varied elements of his music into a multi-tonal mosaic of great power, humor, color, wit, sensuality, compassion and tenderness. The fact that Ornette has once again managed to create such intelligent and passionate music using only the most venerable and fundamental of all African-American "forms" (i.e. the Blues) as an aesthetic focus is cause for celebration in a culture that worships gimmicks and cant over vision and heart. It is also an indication that like all truly "great artists," Ornette recognizes and uses the eternal value(s) of simplicity. Of course, as any working artist can tell you, this is one of the most difficult things to do. Luckily for the rest of us, this is Coleman’s strength.
In this record, Ornette and his now six-year-old Prime Time Band never lose sight of the essential conceptual and spiritual aspects of Ornette’s musical philosophy: "Play the music, not the background." In the eight pieces on this recording, as in all of Ornette’s music, the emphasis is never on virtuoso pyrotechnics for their own sake, or in empty stylistic phrase mongering. In every composition there is a synergy of thought and feeling that communicates instantly. There is always a dynamic unity of structure and execution that is performed with spirit and expressive animation. Coleman’s intricate and functional knowledge of black creative music tradi tions allows him to do this in a deceptively easy manner. The music literally pours out of this ensemble in strains of melody and rhythm that sums up the last 100 years of creative development in Afro-American music.
This awesome command is augmented, in Coleman’s case, with a very strong emotional affinity for the most ancient and basic "folk musics" developed by black people in the New World. Thus, in this recording there are rocking riff figures, field hollers, intensely lyrical worksongs, roaring call-and-response counterpoint, wailing melodic laments and exultations, wry little stompdown ditties and jumptime rent part be-bopping. There are also multi-rhythmic chants, sound clusters, tonal density and instrumental speechmaking. This colorful tapes try is held together by Coleman’s famous Harmolodic method, a theoretical construct that Ornette devised in the early 1970s to "allow all instruments in the band the equal opportunity to lead at any time..." This means that all members of the band can play melodic lines in any key at any time, because structurally the tempo, the rhythm and the harmonics are all equal in terms of what they can express. There is a constant modulation of tonality and rhythms as a result. In this liberated environmental setting the tonal "jumping-off point" is always the Blues, and I mean all kinds of Blues!
Ornette plays every conceivable Blues ever invented and a few that he introduced to the world. In every sound, gesture, cadence and juxtaposition. Coleman reminds us that without the Blues there would be no "jazz," no "rock," no "pop," no "funk," no "punk." In short, no American vernacular music, just bland one-dimensional imitations of European, Asian, Latin and African musics. It is a humbling and sobering thought that makes us reflect even as we dance like mad to the throbbing, driving rhythms. Strangely, despite the echoes of Robert Johnson, Blind Lemon Jefferson, Sonny Boy Williamson, Little Walter, Muddy Waters, B.B. King and Jimi Hendrix (among many others) throughout this music, the overall effect is unlike any Blues you have heard before. This is because of what Coleman does with the form in contemporary terms.
Meanwhile, Ornette rides the swelling and descending crest of these tidal waves of melody and sound through keening, darting and singing improvisations that convey a very wise and ancient message. This is the eternal blues message of joyful affirmation in the face of adversity and despair. A "heroism" based on hard-won experience and not media posturing. Whether shouting, screaming, moaning, laughing, crying or sighing, the music in Of Human Feelings never fails to express this message that lifts you higher and makes you dance no matter what "the problem." The energy derived from the spirit of this recording is the "solution" to our problems. In fact, the title of one of Ornette’s tunes in this recording is "What is the Name of that Song?" I betcha Reagan doesn’t know. I hope we do.
— Kofi Natambu