| Revision as of 02:23, 8 January 2014 editArzel (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers12,013 edits →You should not be surprised← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:48, 8 January 2014 edit undoNewsAndEventsGuy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers27,732 edits →You should not be surprised: How to persuade me to change my mindNext edit → | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| You should not be surprised. There was zero chance that it would be deleted. There may be no cabel, but if there were this one would be so deeply entrenched as to be impossible to break. ] (]) 02:22, 8 January 2014 (UTC) | You should not be surprised. There was zero chance that it would be deleted. There may be no cabel, but if there were this one would be so deeply entrenched as to be impossible to break. ] (]) 02:22, 8 January 2014 (UTC) | ||
| :Convince me without histrionics but with logic and discussion of the content of RSs that the list criteria are original research, and I'll switch to "delete". ] (]) 06:48, 8 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 06:48, 8 January 2014
Revert on Sati
Only one source is Tagged, not any other, you simply reverted back to the favorite version of Single purpose account, without explaining much.
Thanks OccultZone (talk) 15:49, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
FYI you were obliquely mentioned
FYI, I made reference to the AFD "filing party" as an edit warrior, without naming names, but of course I meant you. The mention is here. I'm not seeking any action against you specifically, just wanting the process to work without shortcutting. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 22:11, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
François Ponchaud
Hello! Your submission of François Ponchaud at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Iselilja (talk) 02:55, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
You should not be surprised
You should not be surprised. There was zero chance that it would be deleted. There may be no cabel, but if there were this one would be so deeply entrenched as to be impossible to break. Arzel (talk) 02:22, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
- Convince me without histrionics but with logic and discussion of the content of RSs that the list criteria are original research, and I'll switch to "delete". NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 06:48, 8 January 2014 (UTC)