| Revision as of 06:10, 18 June 2006 editSynergy (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers21,794 edits →Involved parties← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:29, 18 June 2006 edit undoFrater FiatLux (talk | contribs)566 edits →Involved parties: Removal of user Zos extraneous commentNext edit → | ||
| Line 100: | Line 100: | ||
| *{{user|JMax555}} | *{{user|JMax555}} | ||
| *{{user|999}} | *{{user|999}} | ||
| *] - Also known as: SynergeticMaggot, both these Users have the same talk page and user page. | *] - Also known as: SynergeticMaggot, both these Users have the same talk page and user page. | ||
| '''Comment''': I am only one user. ] 00:50, 18 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *{{user|Ehheh}} | *{{user|Ehheh}} | ||
| Line 119: | Line 118: | ||
| :'''User talk pages:''' | :'''User talk pages:''' | ||
| **'''Comment''': This section is supposed to be where you (Frater FiatLux), were supposed to have informed all the parties involved that there is a request for mediation. Please fix this. Thanks. ] 06:10, 18 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :*] | :*] | ||
| :*] | :*] | ||
Revision as of 13:29, 18 June 2006
Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/Rfm-header
Instructions
New requests should be listed at the top of the "New Requests" section, right below the template sample. All requests must use the template provided below.
- Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/Guide provides an explanation for how to file a request.
- Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/Sample shows the template with instructions.
- Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/Common Reasons for Rejection has a description of common reasons for rejecting requests.
All parties to the mediation must indicate agreement to mediate by signing the "Parties' agreement to mediate" section; any request that has not been signed by all parties within 7 days will be rejected. Please watch this page during the time the case is listed here; if additional information is required, you will be asked here, and expected to respond within the 7 day period.
Case name (Sample)
Edits to this section will be reverted immediately.
Involved parties
Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request: Provide diffs showing where {{RFMF}} was added to the talk page(s) of the involved article(s), and {{RFM-Request}} was placed on the talk pages of the other parties.
- Article talk pages:
- User talk pages:
Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:
Issues to be mediated
- Issue 1
- Issue 2
Additional issues to be mediated
- Additional issue 1
- Additional issue 2
Parties' agreement to mediate
- All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.
- Agree.
Decision of the Mediation Committee
- Accept/Reject/Extend: Reason for rejection (if rejected), additional required information (if extended.)
- For the Mediation Committee, (Mediation Committee members only.)
no commentary, no extra information, just what is required in this template.
If you choose to ignore these instructions, your case will likewise be ignored. Caveat lector.
New Requests
Neo-fascism
Involved parties
Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request:
- Article talk pages:
- User talk pages:
Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:
- ]
Issues to be mediated
- A dispute concerning the presence or absence of neo-fascism in the United States. User:Intangible feels that some published material should simply be deleted.
Additional issues to be mediated
None
Parties' agreement to mediate
- All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.
- Agree. --Cberlet 02:03, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
- Agree.
Decision of the Mediation Committee
- Accept/Reject/Extend: Reason for rejection (if rejected), additional required information (if extended.)
- For the Mediation Committee, (Mediation Committee members only.)
Three Articles
Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn, Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn (Rosicrucian Order of A+O), The Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn, Inc..
Involved parties
- Frater FiatLux (talk · contribs)
- Zanoni666 (talk · contribs)
- Kephera975 (talk · contribs)
- Opuaut (talk · contribs) : This user was blocked indefinetly. Zos 05:38, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
- JMax555 (talk · contribs)
- 999 (talk · contribs)
- Zos - Also known as: SynergeticMaggot, both these Users have the same talk page and user page.
- Ehheh (talk · contribs)
Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request: Provide diffs showing where {{RFMF}} was added to the talk page(s) of the involved article(s), and was placed on the talk pages of the other parties.
- Article talk pages:
- User talk pages:
- User:Frater FiatLux
- User:Zanoni666
- Kephera975
- Opuaut
- JMax555
- 999
- Zos Also known as: SynergeticMaggot, both these Users have the same talk page and user page.
Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:
Incessant discussion, in which neither parties can achieve a coherent consensus. There have been repeated attempts at discussions on the disputation with relevant parties, but thus far, is without success or agreement. Editing and Revert warring mainly taking precedence over discussion.
I have tried on many occasions to contact administrators and left messages on the administration board and asked for the articles to be locked down so that edit/revert wars could cease and proper discussion and proposals could begin.
- I'm double indenting to show I did not write the above. We have tried to reach consensus on at least two of the pages that Frater FiatLux has requested mediation on. Zos 05:25, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
Issues to be mediated
Note to parties: Per the instructions, issues should be listed as bullet statements of actual issues to be mediated. Commentary on the nature of the conflict should be reserved for after the request has been accepted. Please provide the issues to be mediated in the form required. Essjay (Talk • Connect) 05:58, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
Parties' agreement to mediate
Agree: Frater FiatLux 22:09, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
- Agree: - Zos 23:12, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Status of religious freedom in Canada
Involved parties
Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
Article talk pages
User talk pages
Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:
- Attempted discussions on the dispute with new user without success.
Issues to be mediated
- DRCarroll did not like the way the article was originally written. He seeks to delete major sections and add what he sees as the other side of the story. Deet feels many of the facts deleted (e.g., Corren) are important in any discussion of religious freedom in Canada and that DRCarroll's edits are generally not aligned with the topic name itself. This has resulted in a major revert war.
Parties' agreement to mediate
- User:Deetdeet - agrees.
Use of images at List of Virtual Boy games
Exploding Boy and nathanrdotcom (Nathan)
Messianic Judaism
File:Yes This request does not use the required format. The filing party will be contacted and asked to properly complete this request. After an appropriate time, if this request does not use the proper format, it will be declined. For assistance in filing the request, please read the guide to formal mediation or contact the Committee. To re-file this request entirely, add {{csd-u1}} to the top of the page; and, when it is deleted, go here.Message added by 05:04, 14 June 2006 (UTC), on behalf of the Mediation Committee.
Neo-Tech
Involved parties
Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request:
- Article talk pages:
- User talk pages:
- ===Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:===
Issues to be mediated
- This concerns the article, Neo-Tech. Bi claims that books published by Integrated Management Associates (a company that publishes material about a philosophy called Neo-Tech) cannot be used as references for the article about Neo-Tech ("Incidentally, the rules also say that "self-published books" are unacceptable as sources. Well, I think I'm going to throw out lots of stuff that come only from Neo-Tech's self-publications. Bi 10:03, 4 May 2006 (UTC)"), which is bizarre becase it's the only sources on the philosophy. Lest there be any doubt, WP:V plainly says: Self-published sources, and published sources of dubious reliability, may be used only as sources of information on themselves, and only in articles about them. For example, the Stormfront website may be used as a source of information on itself in an article about Stormfront, so long as the information is notable, not unduly self-aggrandizing, and not contradicted by reliable, third-party published sources. Self-published sources may never be used as sources of information on another person or topic. Of course you can use the books as sources about the philosophy, in the article about the philosophy! Otherwise, the article would be blank! (As an aside, I'd like to note that the company also publishes the work of other writers not associated with the company as well). Also, he sources "criticism" of Neo-Tech from web forums, self-published web pages, etc rather than from credible published sources. He expressed a desire for form dispute resolution, as have I. Please assist enforcing the Misplaced Pages policies on sourcing. It should be pretty simple and straightforward to mediate this. Thank you. RJII 01:58, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
Additional issues to be mediated
- Thank you. In addition to being self-published, the Neo-Tech literature can be considered to be "unduly self-aggrandizing", which WP:V does not allow. Besides, given that Neo-Tech literature is self-published and self-aggrandizing, it would seem unfair to use a different standard for admitting views opposed to Neo-Tech. Bi 06:07, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Parties' agreement to mediate
- All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected.
- Agree. RJII 03:03, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
- Agree. Bi 06:08, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Decision of the Mediation Committee
- Accept/Reject/Extend:
- For the Mediation Committee,
- Chairman's note: Recuse from involvement. Another member of the committee will need to accept/reject the case and assign a mediator. Essjay (Talk • Connect) 06:38, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
- Comments
- NOw I see Neo-Tech is a disambiguatio npage. Which one is this mediation about? -- Drini 12:24, 24 May 2006 (UTC)