Misplaced Pages

Sun Language Theory: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:01, 24 November 2013 editJosve05a (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers153,813 editsm clean up, removed stub tag using AWB (9726)← Previous edit Revision as of 16:52, 29 January 2014 edit undoJorisvS (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers46,766 editsmNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{linguistics}} {{linguistics}}


The '''Sun Language Theory''' ({{lang-tr|Güneş Dil Teorisi}}) was a ] ] ] hypothesis developed in ] in the 1930s that proposed that all human ]s are descendants of one proto-] primal language. The theory proposed that because this primal language had close ] resemblances to Turkish, all other languages can essentially be traced back to Turkic roots. According to the theory, the Central Asian worshippers, who wanted to salute the omnipotence of the sun and its life-giving qualities, had done so by transforming their meaningless blabbering into a coherent set of ritual utterings, and language was born, hence the name.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Aytürk, İlker |year=2004 |month=November |title=Turkish Linguists against the West: The Origins of Linguistic Nationalism in Atatürk's Turkey |journal=Middle Eastern Studies |volume=40 |issue=6 |pages=pp.1&ndash;25 |location=London |publisher=Frank Cass & Co (Routledge) |doi=10.1080/0026320042000282856 |issn=0026-3206 |oclc=86539631}}</ref> The '''Sun Language Theory''' ({{lang-tr|Güneş Dil Teorisi}}) was a ] ] ] hypothesis developed in ] in the 1930s that proposed that all human ]s are descendants of one proto-] primal language. The theory proposed that because this primal language had close ] resemblances to Turkish, all other languages can essentially be traced back to Turkic roots. According to the theory, the Central Asian worshippers, who wanted to salute the omnipotence of the sun and its life-giving qualities, had done so by transforming their meaningless blabbering into a coherent set of ritual utterings, and language was born, hence the name.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Aytürk, İlker |year=2004 |month=November |title=Turkish Linguists against the West: The Origins of Linguistic Nationalism in Atatürk's Turkey |journal=Middle Eastern Studies |volume=40 |issue=6 |pages=pp.1&ndash;25 |location=London |publisher=Frank Cass & Co (Routledge) |doi=10.1080/0026320042000282856 |issn=0026-3206 |oclc=86539631}}</ref>


==Origins== ==Origins==

Revision as of 16:52, 29 January 2014

Part of a series on
Linguistics
General linguistics
Applied linguistics
Theoretical frameworks
Topics
Portal

The Sun Language Theory (Template:Lang-tr) was a Turkish nationalist pseudoscientific linguistic hypothesis developed in Turkey in the 1930s that proposed that all human languages are descendants of one proto-Turkic primal language. The theory proposed that because this primal language had close phonemic resemblances to Turkish, all other languages can essentially be traced back to Turkic roots. According to the theory, the Central Asian worshippers, who wanted to salute the omnipotence of the sun and its life-giving qualities, had done so by transforming their meaningless blabbering into a coherent set of ritual utterings, and language was born, hence the name.

Origins

Influences on the theory included:

  • a paper of the Austrian linguist Dr. Hermann F. Kvergić of Vienna entitled "La psychologie de quelques elements des langues Turques" ("The Psychology of Some Elements of the Turkic Languages")

The founder and first president of the Republic of Turkey, Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, gave the theory official backing and material support.

Tenets

As described in a 1936 The New York Times article on the curriculum of the newly opened School of Language, History and Geography of Ankara University:

claims that the Sumerians, being Turks, originating in Central Asia, all languages also consequently originated there and first used by the Turks. the first language, in fact, came into being in this way: Prehistoric man, i.e., Turks in the most primitive stage, was so struck by the effects of the sun on life that he made of it a deity whence sprang all good and evil. Thence came to him light, darkness, warmth and fire, with it were associated all ideas of time: height, distance, movement, size, and give expression to his feelings the sun was thus the first thing to which a name was given. It was "ag" (pronounced agh), and from this syllable all words in use today are derived. This, briefly, is the theory about the "sun language," and with the new conception of Turkish history it will be taught in the new Angora school.

In short, based upon a helio-centric view of the origin of civilization and human languages, the theory claimed that the Turkish language was the language which all civilized languages derived from.

Some of the words provided with false Turkish etymologies through the practice of goropism were school, which was attributed to the Turkish word okul (school); God, attributed to the Turkish kut (blessing); Bulletin from belleten (to learn by heart); Electric from Uyghur yaltrık (shine).

According to linguist Ghil'ad Zuckermann, "it is possible that the Sun Language Theory was adopted by Atatürk in order to legitimize the Arabic and Persian words which the Turkish language authorities did not manage to uproot. This move compensated for the failure to provide a neologism for every foreignism/loanword."

See also

Notes

  1. Aytürk, İlker (2004). "Turkish Linguists against the West: The Origins of Linguistic Nationalism in Atatürk's Turkey". Middle Eastern Studies. 40 (6). London: Frank Cass & Co (Routledge): pp.1–25. doi:10.1080/0026320042000282856. ISSN 0026-3206. OCLC 86539631. {{cite journal}}: |pages= has extra text (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  2. ^ "Turks Teach New Theories". New York Times. Istanbul. 1936-02-09.
  3. Laut, Jens Peter (2002). "Noch einmal zu Dr. Kvergić" (PDF reprinted online). Turkic Languages (in German). 6. Wiesbaden, Germany: Harrassowitz Verlag: pp.120–133. ISSN 1431-4983. OCLC 37421320. Retrieved 2007-12-05. {{cite journal}}: |pages= has extra text (help)
  4. See Speros Vryonis. The Turkish State and History: Clio meets the Grey Wolf, 2nd Ed. Thessaloniki: Institute for Balkan Studies, 1993.
  5. Cemal Kafadar, Between Two Worlds: The Construction of the Ottoman State, Published by University of California Press, 1996. pg 163.
  6. Geoffrey Lewis, "The Turkish Language Reform: A Catastrophic Success."
  7. Zuckermann, Ghil’ad (2003), ‘‘Language Contact and Lexical Enrichment in Israeli Hebrew’’, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, ISBN 1-4039-1723-X, p. 165.

Further reading

Turkish nationalism
Ideology
Organizations
Political
parties
People
Historical
events
Policies
Categories: