Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
The ] ] is the only one which never had a single final match. It was also the first year that the cup itself would be referred to as the ], to mark the 25th anniversary of Rimet's presidency of ]. It was won by ], who won the inaugural competition in ].
The ] ] is the only one which never had a single final match. It was also the first year that the cup itself would be referred to as the ], to mark the 25th anniversary of Rimet's presidency of ]. It was won by ], who won the inaugural competition in ].
] meant that the World Cup had not been held since ]; it also meant that most of ] lay in ruins after the ravaging effects of the war. As a result, the honour of hosting the World Cup fell to ], the only country that applied. The group stages of that year's tournament took a strange form, with some groups containing two, three, or four teams. This was because some nations qualified for the tournament and then withdrew. For example, ] withdrew after qualification because FIFA would not allow the team to play barefoot.
] meant that the World Cup had not been held since ]; it also meant that most of ] lay in ruins after the ravaging effects of the war. As a result, the honour of hosting the World Cup fell to ], the only country that applied. The group stages of that year's tournament took a strange form, with some groups containing two, three, or four teams. This was because some nations qualified for the tournament and then withdrew. ] withdrew after qualification because FIFA would not allow the team to play barefoot.
The ] nations were able to take part, having rejoined FIFA four years earlier, after 17 years of self-imposed exile. ] and ] qualified, but the Scots then said they would only go if they became British champions. In the end they refused to attend after finishing runners-up in the ] to England, who beat them 1-0 at Hampden Park in April.
The ] nations were able to take part, having rejoined FIFA four years earlier, after 17 years of self-imposed exile. ] and ] qualified, but the Scots then said they would only go if they became British champions. In the end they refused to attend after finishing runners-up in the ] to England, who beat them 1-0 at Hampden Park in April. ] withdrew as well.
A combined Great Britain team had recently beaten the rest of Europe 6-1 in an exhibition match and England went into the competition as one of the favourites. However, it was not to be, as they went crashing out in a shocking 1-0 defeat by the ] (when the score appeared in English newspapers, many thought it was a typo), which combined with their 1-0 defeat by ] led to Spain continuing to the Final Pool.
A combined Great Britain team had recently beaten the rest of Europe 6-1 in an exhibition match and England went into the competition as one of the favourites. However, it was not to be, as they went crashing out in a shocking 1-0 defeat by the ] (when the score appeared in English newspapers, many thought it was a typo), which combined with their 1-0 defeat by ] led to Spain continuing to the Final Pool.
Revision as of 17:33, 17 September 2004
Football World Cup 1950:
The 1950Football World Cup is the only one which never had a single final match. It was also the first year that the cup itself would be referred to as the Jules Rimet Cup, to mark the 25th anniversary of Rimet's presidency of FIFA. It was won by Uruguay, who won the inaugural competition in 1930.
World War II meant that the World Cup had not been held since 1938; it also meant that most of Europe lay in ruins after the ravaging effects of the war. As a result, the honour of hosting the World Cup fell to Brazil, the only country that applied. The group stages of that year's tournament took a strange form, with some groups containing two, three, or four teams. This was because some nations qualified for the tournament and then withdrew. India withdrew after qualification because FIFA would not allow the team to play barefoot.
The British nations were able to take part, having rejoined FIFA four years earlier, after 17 years of self-imposed exile. England and Scotland qualified, but the Scots then said they would only go if they became British champions. In the end they refused to attend after finishing runners-up in the British Home Championship to England, who beat them 1-0 at Hampden Park in April. Turkey withdrew as well.
A combined Great Britain team had recently beaten the rest of Europe 6-1 in an exhibition match and England went into the competition as one of the favourites. However, it was not to be, as they went crashing out in a shocking 1-0 defeat by the USA (when the score appeared in English newspapers, many thought it was a typo), which combined with their 1-0 defeat by Spain led to Spain continuing to the Final Pool.
The Final Pool took the form of a final group stage, involving all teams who won their group stage: Brazil, Spain, Sweden, and Uruguay. The overall winner of the World Cup for 1950 would be the team that managed to finish on top of this group. Brazil outscored everyone with a 7-0 thrashing of Sweden and 6-1 rout of Spain. In the decisive match, Brazil were sitting on top of the Final Pool and had one game left to play – Uruguay who lay just behind in second and only a point behind. On July 16th in the Estadio Maracanã, the host nation had only to draw against Uruguay and the trophy would be theirs. After such crushing victories over Spain and Sweden, it looked certain they would take the title, especially as the home nation went ahead in the second minute of the second half, thanks to a goal from Fraica. However, Uruguay equalised and then with just over 11 minutes left to play, went ahead 2-1 and Uruguay were crowned World Cup Winners for a second time.
.png){kind=small}
