Misplaced Pages

User talk:BedsBookworm: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:31, 31 January 2014 editBedsBookworm (talk | contribs)180 edits Meatpuppetry accusation: reply← Previous edit Revision as of 13:04, 17 February 2014 edit undoWee Curry Monster (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers25,546 edits Google Cite tool: new sectionNext edit →
Line 23: Line 23:
I note that you're accusing me on talk pages of having some kind of ] puppetry association with Cambalachero. You should take this matter to the appropriate place (]? Not sure). Otherwise, please stop doing it. --] <small>(])</small> 22:44, 18 January 2014 (UTC) I note that you're accusing me on talk pages of having some kind of ] puppetry association with Cambalachero. You should take this matter to the appropriate place (]? Not sure). Otherwise, please stop doing it. --] <small>(])</small> 22:44, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
:Please read my comments more carefully. I didn't accuse you of Meat Puppetry but commented on reverting to insert dubiously sourced material from a topic banned editor; one banned for POV editing. On my first interaction with you, you were accusing me of POV editing. Coming here with that comment smacks of gross hypocrisy. Please cut out the personal crap, its the content we should discuss not each other. ] (]) 11:31, 31 January 2014 (UTC) :Please read my comments more carefully. I didn't accuse you of Meat Puppetry but commented on reverting to insert dubiously sourced material from a topic banned editor; one banned for POV editing. On my first interaction with you, you were accusing me of POV editing. Coming here with that comment smacks of gross hypocrisy. Please cut out the personal crap, its the content we should discuss not each other. ] (]) 11:31, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

== Google Cite tool ==

The Google Cite tool creates a label for the citation. It creates the same label each time, so if you repeatedly use it, the reference is overwritten.

I'll fix it for you on David Jewett. ] <small>]</small> 13:04, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

PS on an unrelated matter, I see you've linked ] and ]. Having had experience of both over the years I don't think it is the case. ] is a reasonable editor and whilst clearly a strong advocate of the Argentine POV is more than capable of compromising to agree on a ] text. His main mistake in the topic ban was using sources from the Argentine revisionist movement, which has a habit of distorting history in advance of Peronism. They're accepted mainstream in Argentina, not so well accepted outside of the country. And I personally considered the arbcom result somewhat one sided, see for the reason why. ] <small>]</small> 13:04, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:04, 17 February 2014

Welcome!

Hello, BedsBookworm and Welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions to this 💕. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! KennethSides (talk) 12:52, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Talkback

Hello, BedsBookworm. You have new messages at Wee Curry Monster's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

David Jewett

It seems all of the David Jewett related pages have masses of unsourced speculative material in them at the moment. On of the claims is that Weddell thought Jewett's voyage was chiefly intended for the purpose of securing an exclusive claim to the wreck of the French ship Uranie and that Weddell "didn't believe" Jewett. None of this is in the Weddell text. Is there any source that makes these claims? If not they should be removed en masse. __ E L A Q U E A T E 19:11, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Meatpuppetry accusation

I note that you're accusing me on talk pages of having some kind of WP:MEAT puppetry association with Cambalachero. You should take this matter to the appropriate place (WP:SPI? Not sure). Otherwise, please stop doing it. --Langus (t) 22:44, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Please read my comments more carefully. I didn't accuse you of Meat Puppetry but commented on reverting to insert dubiously sourced material from a topic banned editor; one banned for POV editing. On my first interaction with you, you were accusing me of POV editing. Coming here with that comment smacks of gross hypocrisy. Please cut out the personal crap, its the content we should discuss not each other. BedsBookworm (talk) 11:31, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Google Cite tool

The Google Cite tool creates a label for the citation. It creates the same label each time, so if you repeatedly use it, the reference is overwritten.

I'll fix it for you on David Jewett. Wee Curry Monster talk 13:04, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

PS on an unrelated matter, I see you've linked User:Cambalachero and User:Langus-TxT. Having had experience of both over the years I don't think it is the case. User:Cambalachero is a reasonable editor and whilst clearly a strong advocate of the Argentine POV is more than capable of compromising to agree on a WP:NPOV text. His main mistake in the topic ban was using sources from the Argentine revisionist movement, which has a habit of distorting history in advance of Peronism. They're accepted mainstream in Argentina, not so well accepted outside of the country. And I personally considered the arbcom result somewhat one sided, see for the reason why. Wee Curry Monster talk 13:04, 17 February 2014 (UTC)