| Revision as of 02:45, 20 February 2014 editJim Carter (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers13,632 edits Suggestion and welcome message.Tag: Mobile edit | Revision as of 00:16, 22 February 2014 edit undoStfg (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users19,656 edits →Your AfC draft (2): new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| == Your AfC draft == | == Your AfC draft == | ||
| Hello there, thank you for creating ]. I have seen the draft there were some minor problems with the article which I have fixed (You can see the changes here ) but the major problem is Notability. That means if the subject is a notable person or not. If notable then please add some verifiable references. Please see ] and ] before procceding If the draft is not notable and if you cannot introduce references then there is a chance that your draft may not pass AfC review. If you need assistance please feel free to contact me on my ] or ask a question at ]. I know you can improve. Regards. ]</b> (]) 02:45, 20 February 2014 (UTC) | Hello there, thank you for creating ]. I have seen the draft there were some minor problems with the article which I have fixed (You can see the changes here ) but the major problem is Notability. That means if the subject is a notable person or not. If notable then please add some verifiable references. Please see ] and ] before procceding If the draft is not notable and if you cannot introduce references then there is a chance that your draft may not pass AfC review. If you need assistance please feel free to contact me on my ] or ask a question at ]. I know you can improve. Regards. ]</b> (]) 02:45, 20 February 2014 (UTC) | ||
| == Your AfC draft (2) == | |||
| Hello Mark. ] has unfortunately slightly misadvised you about your AfC draft. Let's see if I can help. The issue is not so much about your notability, and I'm not going to take a view one way or another about that today. The issue is about writing an article about yourself. This can backfire, as Wikipedians take a strong view about self-promotion, and your draft does unfortunately look very much like that. It is written in the language of a resumé rather than that of an encyclopedia article. I would recommend you to remove the {{tl|AFC submission}} template from the draft for now and to take time to consider your next step. It would then be a good idea to read ] and ] (and surf from those, if you like) before deciding what to do. Those pages will give you a good idea of the issues that can arise. | |||
| I will keep both your talk page and your draft article on my watch list for now, so you are welcome to reply here and I will discuss with you if you wish. (Please note I'm in the UK, so my times are different from yours.) Kind regards, --] (]) 00:16, 22 February 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:16, 22 February 2014
Welcome!
Hello, Mark W. Rocha, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Misplaced Pages Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! We're so glad you're here! Jim Cartar (talk) 02:45, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Your AfC draft
Hello there, thank you for creating this draft. I have seen the draft there were some minor problems with the article which I have fixed (You can see the changes here ) but the major problem is Notability. That means if the subject is a notable person or not. If notable then please add some verifiable references. Please see WP:GNG and WP:GP before procceding If the draft is not notable and if you cannot introduce references then there is a chance that your draft may not pass AfC review. If you need assistance please feel free to contact me on my talk page or ask a question at our teahouse. I know you can improve. Regards. Jim Cartar (talk) 02:45, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Your AfC draft (2)
Hello Mark. User:Jim Cartar has unfortunately slightly misadvised you about your AfC draft. Let's see if I can help. The issue is not so much about your notability, and I'm not going to take a view one way or another about that today. The issue is about writing an article about yourself. This can backfire, as Wikipedians take a strong view about self-promotion, and your draft does unfortunately look very much like that. It is written in the language of a resumé rather than that of an encyclopedia article. I would recommend you to remove the {{AFC submission}} template from the draft for now and to take time to consider your next step. It would then be a good idea to read Misplaced Pages:Autobiography and Misplaced Pages:Conflict of interest (and surf from those, if you like) before deciding what to do. Those pages will give you a good idea of the issues that can arise.
I will keep both your talk page and your draft article on my watch list for now, so you are welcome to reply here and I will discuss with you if you wish. (Please note I'm in the UK, so my times are different from yours.) Kind regards, --Stfg (talk) 00:16, 22 February 2014 (UTC)