Misplaced Pages

User talk:Snowded: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:27, 2 March 2014 editSnowded (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers37,634 edits →Why?← Previous edit Revision as of 21:23, 2 March 2014 edit undoMatt Lewis (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers9,196 edits →Why?: But what's the point of arguing like that when you are even possibly-wrong?Next edit →
Line 91: Line 91:


:Sorry Matt but you did not reach a consensus and you have a very bad habit of insisting you are right and insulting everyone else. You know the rules on edit warring, you have violated them. ----] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 20:27, 2 March 2014 (UTC) :Sorry Matt but you did not reach a consensus and you have a very bad habit of insisting you are right and insulting everyone else. You know the rules on edit warring, you have violated them. ----] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 20:27, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

::Actually there was general acceptance for the compromise text I added - you just weren't following it unfortunately. It was accepted and acceptable. Tempers were frayed and no one voted that's all (I really don't like over-doing straw polls). Dai certainly wouldn't have reverted on his own: he just followed you, and BW does a bit of everything as you know.

::Re being "right about everything": what's the point of arguing like that when you are even-possibly wrong? I only do it when things are this clear and it really matters too. I'm having a break for a week anyway. BW might back you today btw, but he won't on all issues of course. ] (]) 21:23, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:23, 2 March 2014

Welcome to my talk page!

  • Please use the Reply button to reply to a message, or add topic (+) to start a new section.
  • If I have left a message on your talk page, please DO NOT post a reply here, instead, reply there.
    • Mention me using the "Mention a user" button in the Reply box or type out {{ping|Snowded}}.
    • I will have your talk page on watch and will note when you have replied.
  • If you prefer to manually edit the page to post:
    • Use an accurate and appropriate heading.
    • Indent your comment by using an appropriate number of colons ':'.
    • Sign your post with four tildes (~~~~) at the end.

Easter Rising

Hello, Snowded. You have new messages at Rannpháirtí anaithnid's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The Signpost: 29 January 2014

FWIW

Santayana may be right. . Cheers. Collect (talk) 13:30, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 February 2014

The Signpost: 19 February 2014

The Signpost: 26 February 2014

UAF

Did you notice that with Lokalkosmopolit replaced that smear about the Lee Rigby murderer with the comment "a bit about the kind of antifascism the UAF supporters practise"? I've given him a warning, but that's a pretty incredible edit summary. Dougweller (talk) 22:13, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Yep, part of a pattern ----Snowded 07:25, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Why?

When we've disagreed over the years, why do you always begin some kind of 'call for action' on me by pretending I'm some kind of persistent Misplaced Pages criminal ("up to old ways" etc) You've always done that, just as you call people multi-socking Single Purpose accounts like WikIPeire "great content editors" when it suits you. Can't you do this kind of thing fairly?

This is a killer '3RR'. Content-wise you don't have a leg to stand on, and I think you actually know it to. I think this was fully settled last night: you've just dragged it back up. What a waste of Misplaced Pages's time. All in the name of what? Minority nationalist politics. Certainly not policy content, so how can I can't see it as anything else? Matt Lewis (talk) 20:21, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Sorry Matt but you did not reach a consensus and you have a very bad habit of insisting you are right and insulting everyone else. You know the rules on edit warring, you have violated them. ----Snowded 20:27, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Actually there was general acceptance for the compromise text I added - you just weren't following it unfortunately. It was accepted and acceptable. Tempers were frayed and no one voted that's all (I really don't like over-doing straw polls). Dai certainly wouldn't have reverted on his own: he just followed you, and BW does a bit of everything as you know.
Re being "right about everything": what's the point of arguing like that when you are even-possibly wrong? I only do it when things are this clear and it really matters too. I'm having a break for a week anyway. BW might back you today btw, but he won't on all issues of course. Matt Lewis (talk) 21:23, 2 March 2014 (UTC)