Misplaced Pages

User talk:Worm That Turned: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:42, 3 March 2014 editSomeone not using his real name (talk | contribs)11,896 edits Holdek← Previous edit Revision as of 18:43, 3 March 2014 edit undoSomeone not using his real name (talk | contribs)11,896 edits HoldekNext edit →
Line 53: Line 53:
Do you really think it was wise to unblock him? He started trolling me immediately after your misguided goodwill gesture. See ANI. ] (]) 18:31, 3 March 2014 (UTC) Do you really think it was wise to unblock him? He started trolling me immediately after your misguided goodwill gesture. See ANI. ] (]) 18:31, 3 March 2014 (UTC)


By the way, I have not been following the Toddst drama, but he was right about socking issue. Just ask user ], who was the main target of that IP socking/trolling. In your (ArbCom's) misguided attempt to punish Toddst, you have enabled the return of a much worse editor (Holder). ] (]) By the way, I have not been following the Toddst1 drama, but he was right about socking issue. Just ask user ], who was the main target of that IP socking/trolling. In your (ArbCom's) misguided attempt to punish Toddst1, you have enabled the return of a much worse editor (Holdek). ] (])

Revision as of 18:43, 3 March 2014

User Talk Articles To Do Toolbox Subpages DYK Awards


Archives
Index
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3
Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6
Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9
Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12
Archive 13Archive 14Archive 15
Archive 16Archive 17Archive 18
Archive 19Archive 20Archive 21
Archive 22Archive 23Archive 24
Archive 25Archive 26Archive 27
Archive 28Archive 29Archive 30
Archive 31Archive 32Archive 33
Archive 34Archive 35Archive 36
Archive 37


This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

Welcome to my talk page. Leave me a message! I am probably offline and am unable to respond swiftly. I will respond as soon as I can. Please feel free to send me an email, where I will likely respond faster.

This user is stalked by friendly talk page staplers.
This user replies where s/he likes, and is inconsistent in that respect.

Happy Holidays!

User:Sportsguy17/Happy Holidays 2013

Stargazy

You should know that I used the pie for a special award for a brave editor, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:25, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Sooner or later, the editor in question is likely to leave a puppy on my talkpage as a gesture of thanks...
... and, true to my roots in the north-west, ... that, too, is likely to result in pie! --Demiurge1000 (talk) 22:28, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Suburban Express

Hi,

I noticed you taking over the block on User:Arri at Suburban Express on behalf of Arbcom. Note that I had also blocked two declared alternate accounts of the same person, User:Arri416 and User:Suburban Express President as part of the same administrative action. I don't know whether taking those over would amount to anything more than bureaucratic nitpicking, but it's probably best if you're aware of these. I'll also note that I blocked the second one 2 months later after another user drew my attention to it, and there were no shenanigans involved with that particular account in the meantime. Thanks, MLauba 14:02, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll grab both of them too. The fact is there's too much off wiki stuff for an admin to make an informed decision, so it's going to have to be Arbcom that does. Worm(talk) 14:07, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Makes sense. MLauba 17:50, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages talk:Editor review#RfC: Should we mark WP:ER as historical?

You are invited to join the discussion at Misplaced Pages talk:Editor review#RfC: Should we mark WP:ER as historical?. As you participated in Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Editor review (2nd nomination) last year, you may be interested in the current RfC discussing closing and marking ER as historical. —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 02:55, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

SG for Stargazy Pie

On 3 March 2014, Schon gewusst? was updated with a fact from the translation of the article Stargazy pie, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was: Wenn aus einer Backform Fische Richtung Himmel gucken, könnte es sich um Stargazy Pie handeln. (When fish gaze from a form to heaven it might be Stargazy Pie.) You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (quick check).

Guten Appetit, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:46, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Ahhhh it's spreading! The world will all know of the fishy pie! Worm(talk) 15:55, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Holdek

Do you really think it was wise to unblock him? He started trolling me immediately after your misguided goodwill gesture. See ANI. Someone not using his real name (talk) 18:31, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

By the way, I have not been following the Toddst1 drama, but he was right about this socking issue. Just ask user User:Ymblanter, who was the main target of that IP socking/trolling. In your (ArbCom's) misguided attempt to punish Toddst1, you have enabled the return of a much worse editor (Holdek). Someone not using his real name (talk)