Revision as of 05:39, 4 March 2014 editInterfase (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,924 edits ←Created page with '{{subst:Request for mediation | parties = #{{user|Divot}} #{{user|Hablabar}} #{{user|Roses&guns}} | articles = #{{pagelinks|Azerbaijan}} | links = * Talk:Az...' | Revision as of 06:27, 4 March 2014 edit undoInterfase (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,924 edits →AzerbaijanNext edit → | ||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
==== Issues to be mediated ==== | ==== Issues to be mediated ==== |
Revision as of 06:27, 4 March 2014
Azerbaijan
The filing party (the editor who opened this request) will add the basic details for this dispute below.- Editors involved in this dispute
- Interfase (talk · contribs) – filing party
- Divot (talk · contribs)
- Hablabar (talk · contribs)
- Roses&guns (talk · contribs)
- Articles affected by this dispute
- Other attempts at resolving this dispute that you have attempted
- Talk:Azerbaijan#Map for the section Name of Azerbaijan
- Talk:Azerbaijan#New Section Name Azerbaijan
- Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Azerbaijan
Issues to be mediated
What is this dispute about? What sections, sentences, or issues in the article(s) can you not agree on? If you are the editor who opened this request, list these issues to be mediated under "Primary issues". If you did not open this request, you can add additional issues to be mediated under "Additional issues". The issues to be mediated would be properly agreed upon later, if this request for mediation is accepted.- Primary issues (added by the filing party)
I created the "Name of Azerbaijan" section in the article Azerbaijan, where the usage of the term "Azerbaijan" was described. Here we could see a lot of sources claiming that the term "Azerbaijan" was used also for the lands on the north side of Aras river. In the map "Russia at the Caucasus" we can see it very well. I think in this section we can use this map which illustrates this fact very well.
But user Divot claims that the map is wrong. I don't agree with him, because there are no any sources saying that "the map is wrong".
Hablabar and Roses&guns don't want to see this section in the article. They see there some WP:CHERRY and some propaganda. But I don't see here any cherry and propaganda. In my opinion the section is about the usage of the term "Azerbaijan" in the region in the different periods of history and is based on several reliable sources (e.g. Iranica). --Interfase (talk) 05:39, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
- Additional issues (added by other parties)
- Additional issue 1
- Additional issue 2
Parties' agreement to mediation
If you are a named party, please sign below and indicate whether you agree or refuse to participate in mediation. Remember that all editors are obliged to resolve disputes about content through discussion, mediation, or other similar means. If you do not wish to participate in mediation, you must arrange another form of dispute resolution. Comments and questions should be made underneath the numbered list below, to avoid confusion.- Agree. Interfase (talk) 05:39, 4 March 2014 (UTC)