| Revision as of 18:43, 3 March 2014 editSomeone not using his real name (talk | contribs)11,896 edits →Holdek← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:53, 4 March 2014 edit undoWorm That Turned (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators25,701 edits →Holdek: reNext edit → | ||
| Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
| Have you (ArbCom) formally decided that Holdek was ''not'' IP socking? ] (]) 18:43, 3 March 2014 (UTC) | Have you (ArbCom) formally decided that Holdek was ''not'' IP socking? ] (]) 18:43, 3 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
| *Hi ], I've commented on ANI. I took the unblock action myself, after reviewing the situation. I did discuss with BASC members, but no part was an Arbcom decision, nor an attempt to punish Toddst1. So, I reviewed the history, I looked at Holdek's behaviour and blocks and absolutely agreed with the 1 month block. The indef, however, wasn't appropriate. The alleged socking wasn't socking, after 4 years it's not unreasonable that an editor came back under an IP first - I've explained that at Holdek's talk page. One single incident of logging out in an edit war does not make an indef. However, if you've got evidence of other logged out editing, I'd be interested to hear it - or you can start an SPI. ]<sup>TT</sup>(]) 09:53, 4 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:53, 4 March 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User | Talk | Articles | To Do | Toolbox | Subpages | DYK | Awards |
 Archives |
| Index |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Welcome to my talk page. Leave me a message!
I am probably offline and am unable to respond swiftly. I will respond as soon as I can. Please feel free to send me an email, where I will likely respond faster.
 | This user is stalked by friendly talk page staplers. |  |
|
Happy Holidays!
User:Sportsguy17/Happy Holidays 2013
Stargazy
You should know that I used the pie for a special award for a brave editor, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:25, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
- Sooner or later, the editor in question is likely to leave a puppy on my talkpage as a gesture of thanks...
- ... and, true to my roots in the north-west, ... that, too, is likely to result in pie! --Demiurge1000 (talk) 22:28, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Suburban Express
Hi,
I noticed you taking over the block on User:Arri at Suburban Express on behalf of Arbcom. Note that I had also blocked two declared alternate accounts of the same person, User:Arri416 and User:Suburban Express President as part of the same administrative action. I don't know whether taking those over would amount to anything more than bureaucratic nitpicking, but it's probably best if you're aware of these. I'll also note that I blocked the second one 2 months later after another user drew my attention to it, and there were no shenanigans involved with that particular account in the meantime. Thanks, MLauba 14:02, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks, I'll grab both of them too. The fact is there's too much off wiki stuff for an admin to make an informed decision, so it's going to have to be Arbcom that does. Worm(talk) 14:07, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
- Makes sense. MLauba 17:50, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages talk:Editor review#RfC: Should we mark WP:ER as historical?
You are invited to join the discussion at Misplaced Pages talk:Editor review#RfC: Should we mark WP:ER as historical?. As you participated in Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Editor review (2nd nomination) last year, you may be interested in the current RfC discussing closing and marking ER as historical. —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 02:55, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
SG for Stargazy Pie
 | On 3 March 2014, Schon gewusst? was updated with a fact from the translation of the article Stargazy pie, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was: Wenn aus einer Backform Fische Richtung Himmel gucken, könnte es sich um Stargazy Pie handeln. (When fish gaze from a form to heaven it might be Stargazy Pie.) You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (quick check). |
Guten Appetit, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:46, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Ahhhh it's spreading! The world will all know of the fishy pie! Worm(talk) 15:55, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
Holdek
Do you really think it was wise to unblock him? He started trolling me immediately after your misguided goodwill gesture. See ANI. Someone not using his real name (talk) 18:31, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
By the way, I have not been following the Toddst1 drama, but he was right about this socking issue. Just ask user User:Ymblanter, who was the main target of that IP socking/trolling. In your (ArbCom's) misguided attempt to punish Toddst1, you have enabled the return of a much worse editor (Holdek). Someone not using his real name (talk)
Have you (ArbCom) formally decided that Holdek was not IP socking? Someone not using his real name (talk) 18:43, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Someone not using his real name, I've commented on ANI. I took the unblock action myself, after reviewing the situation. I did discuss with BASC members, but no part was an Arbcom decision, nor an attempt to punish Toddst1. So, I reviewed the history, I looked at Holdek's behaviour and blocks and absolutely agreed with the 1 month block. The indef, however, wasn't appropriate. The alleged socking wasn't socking, after 4 years it's not unreasonable that an editor came back under an IP first - I've explained that at Holdek's talk page. One single incident of logging out in an edit war does not make an indef. However, if you've got evidence of other logged out editing, I'd be interested to hear it - or you can start an SPI. Worm(talk) 09:53, 4 March 2014 (UTC)