| Revision as of 15:31, 6 March 2014 editTheRedPenOfDoom (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers135,756 edits →February 2014: final warning← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:44, 6 March 2014 edit undoUnbroken Chain (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers32,193 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| ] This is your final warning for inserting content that misrepresents what can be ]. No source is ] for proclaiming ] for a project. -- ] 15:31, 6 March 2014 (UTC) | ] This is your final warning for inserting content that misrepresents what can be ]. No source is ] for proclaiming ] for a project. -- ] 15:31, 6 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
| == March 2014 == | |||
| ] Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. | |||
| To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 15:44, 6 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | |||
Revision as of 15:44, 6 March 2014
February 2014
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Sonakshi Sinha. This contravenes Misplaced Pages's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 21:31, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
- How could that be unsourced ??? 14:38, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
This is your final warning for inserting content that misrepresents what can be verified from the sources. No source is a reliable source for proclaiming a future release date for a project. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 15:31, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
March 2014
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 15:44, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.