| Revision as of 16:05, 23 June 2006 view sourceFormer user 2 (talk | contribs)7,183 edits cites provided← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:30, 23 June 2006 view source Sonofzion (talk | contribs)45 edits introNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| The '''Boycott of Israel''' refers to a series of campaigns designed to isolate the ] via economic measures such as ]ment, consumer boycott of Israeli products or businesses that operate in Israel, academic boycott of ] and scholars, or boycott of ] or ]. The purposes of the boycott vary amongst participants. For instance, the Presbyterian Church's boycott, the UK academic boycott and the boycott by the Canadian trade union ] are aimed at forcing Israel to withdraw from the ] and dismantle the ] and to effect the immediate institution of the right of Palestinians to return to "their homes and properties" inside the current borders of Israel. All three of these boycotts make an analogy with ] in ] as a means of justifying their action. (see ]). | |||
| Critics of these boycotts argue that making unilateral demands on the Israeli side will not promote negotiation and just peace,,,, instead, they argue, demands must be made to both sides pressure on Arab governments to - for example - recognise ]s ] as the ] ] ; as well as making demands on Islamic states to cease funding the campaign of terror against Israeli civilians. | Critics of these boycotts argue that making unilateral demands on the Israeli side will not promote negotiation and just peace,,,, instead, they argue, demands must be made to both sides pressure on Arab governments to - for example - recognise ]s ] as the ] ] ; as well as making demands on Islamic states to cease funding the campaign of terror against Israeli civilians. | ||
Revision as of 20:30, 23 June 2006
The Boycott of Israel refers to a series of campaigns designed to isolate the State of Israel via economic measures such as divestment, consumer boycott of Israeli products or businesses that operate in Israel, academic boycott of Israeli universities and scholars, or boycott of Israeli cultural institutions or Israeli sport venues. The purposes of the boycott vary amongst participants. For instance, the Presbyterian Church's boycott, the UK academic boycott and the boycott by the Canadian trade union CUPE are aimed at forcing Israel to withdraw from the West Bank and dismantle the Israeli West Bank barrier and to effect the immediate institution of the right of Palestinians to return to "their homes and properties" inside the current borders of Israel. All three of these boycotts make an analogy with apartheid in South Africa as a means of justifying their action. (see Israeli apartheid).
Critics of these boycotts argue that making unilateral demands on the Israeli side will not promote negotiation and just peace,,,, instead, they argue, demands must be made to both sides pressure on Arab governments to - for example - recognise Israels Right to exist as the Jewish people Homeland ; as well as making demands on Islamic states to cease funding the campaign of terror against Israeli civilians.
Arab League boycott of Israel
Main articles: Arab economic boycott of Israel and Arab League and the Arab-Israeli conflictArab boycotts of Jewish interests started as early as 1921 in order to discourage Jewish settlement , 27 years before the establishment of Israel. Aiming to isolate the Jewish community economically, a formal boycott was declared by the newly formed Arab League Council on December 2, 1945: "Jewish products and manufactured goods shall be considered undesirable to the Arab countries." All Arab "institutions, organizations, merchants, commission agents and individuals" were called upon "to refuse to deal in, distribute, or consume Zionist products or manufactured goods."
Officially the boycott extends to three areas:
- Products and services which originate in Israel (referred to as the primary boycott)
- Businesses that operate in Israel (the secondary boycott)
- Businesses which have relationships with other businesses which operate in Israel (the tertiary boycott)
Economic boycott
In July 2004, the General Synod of the Presbyterian Church (USA) (PCUSA) voted to "initiate a process of phased selective divestment in multinational corporations operating in Israel". On June 19, 2006, the Committee on Peacemaking and International Issues of the PCUSA adopted a compromise resolution that calls for the Church to invest only in "peaceful pursuits" in Israel and Palestine. The new resolution does not include the word "divestment."
In May 2006, the Ontario section of the Canadian Union of Public Employees approved a resolution to "support the international campaign of boycott, divestment and sanctions against Israel until that state recognizes the Palestinian right to self-determination."
The Congress of South African Trade Unions published a letter expressing their support for the CUPE boycott of Israel.
Academic boycott
In May 2006, Britian's lecturers' union, the National Association of Teachers in Further and Higher Education, voted to support an academic boycott against Israel.. The ban expired four days later when a merger between the lecturer's union and a larger union came into effect.
A prominent Palestinian academic, Sari Nusseibeh, president of Al-Quds University has argued against the boycott telling Associated Press "If we are to look at Israeli society, it is within the academic community that we've had the most progressive pro-peace views and views that have come out in favor of seeing us as equals... If you want to punish any sector, this is the last one to approach." He acknowledges, however, that his view is a minority one amongst Palestinian academics. , .
External links
- Office of Antiboycott Compliance at the United States Department of Commerce
- Israeli university boycott: how a campaign backfired by Tamara Traubmann and Benjamin Joffe-Walt, The Guardian, June 20, 2006
- The anti-Israel Academic Boycott (Zionism on the Web)
- CUPE boycott of Israel won't help cause of peace