| Revision as of 18:11, 15 April 2014 editMann Mann (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers30,183 edits Reverted 1 edit by Yagmurlukorfez (talk): That source is unreliable and (Not expert Not cholary). (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:13, 15 April 2014 edit undoYagmurlukorfez (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users527 edits Undid revision 604334286 by Zyma (talk) Misplaced Pages:HG unproved personel opinionsNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ]-wheeled ] finds is indicated in purple. Adjacent and overlapping cultures (], ], ]) are shown in green.]] | ]-wheeled ] finds is indicated in purple. Adjacent and overlapping cultures (], ], ]) are shown in green.]] | ||
| ]s (after ]). The Andronovo, ] and ]s have often been associated with Indo-Iranian migrations. The ], Cemetery H, Copper Hoard and ] cultures are candidates for cultures associated with Indo-Aryan movements.]] | ]s (after ]). The Andronovo, ] and ]s have often been associated with Indo-Iranian migrations. The ], Cemetery H, Copper Hoard and ] cultures are candidates for cultures associated with Indo-Aryan movements.]] | ||
| ⚫ | {{Indo-European}} | ||
| The '''Andronovo culture''' is a collection of similar local ] ] cultures that flourished ''ca.'' 1800–1400 BCE in western ] and the west ]. It is probably better termed an archaeological complex or ]. The name derives from the village of Andronovo ({{coord|55|53|N|55|42|E|}}), where in 1914, several graves were discovered, with skeletons in crouched positions, buried with richly decorated pottery. | The '''Andronovo culture''' is a collection of similar local ] ] and ] cultures<ref> Encyclopedia, ''"It is hard to precisely specify the beginning of Turkish history. There is a high probability that the oldest culture of Central Asia, the so-called Anav Culture, which was unearthed at the end of toilsome archaeological and anthropological research and has a history that goes back to 4000 B.C., has ties to proto-Turks. As we move forward into the more recent millennia of history, we more clearly see the linkage between the cultures of Kelteminar and Afenesavo (3000 B.C.), Andronova (1700 B.C.), Karasuk (1200 B.C.), Tagar and Tashtyk (700 B.C.) and proto-Turks. There is plenty of scientific evidence proving this linkage, most notably among archaeological findings obtained from the Pazyryk and Issyk mounds".'' : ''"It is reckoned that the culture of Andronovo was created by the ancestors of the Turks, who were white, horse-riders and warriors having spherical heads."'' </ref> that flourished ''ca.'' 1800–1400 BCE in western ] and the west ]. It is probably better termed an archaeological complex or ]. The name derives from the village of Andronovo ({{coord|55|53|N|55|42|E|}}), where in 1914, several graves were discovered, with skeletons in crouched positions, buried with richly decorated pottery. | ||
| The older ] (2100–1800), formerly included within the Andronovo culture, is now considered separately, but regarded as its predecessor, and accepted as part of the wider Andronovo horizon. | The older ] (2100–1800)<ref>http://books.google.com.tr/books?id=fEK-BkqXfJAC&pg=PA57&dq=Sintashta+culture+(2100%E2%80%931800&hl=tr&sa=X&ei=SWVNU9-RB8bPtAbtkICgBw&ved=0CCwQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Sintashta%20culture%20(2100%E2%80%931800&f=false</ref>, formerly included within the Andronovo culture, is now considered separately, but regarded as its predecessor, and accepted as part of the wider Andronovo horizon. | ||
| Sub-cultures have been distinguished:<ref>http://books.google.com.tr/books?id=0FDqf415wqgC&pg=PA448&dq=Andronovo+area+Uralic&hl=tr&sa=X&ei=5mdNU9LbL4mjtAanhoDYBQ&ved=0CDQQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=Andronovo%20area%20Uralic&f=false</ref> | |||
| Sub-cultures have been distinguished: | |||
| *'''Alakul''' (1800–1400 BCE) | *'''Alakul''' (1800–1400 BCE) | ||
| *''']''' (1700–1300 BCE) | *''']''' (1700–1300 BCE) | ||
| *'''] (1200–1000 BCE) | *''']''' (1200–1000 BCE)<ref>http://books.google.com.tr/books?id=tzU3RIV2BWIC&pg=PA20&dq=Alekseyevka+(1200%E2%80%931000+BCE)&hl=tr&sa=X&ei=BWZNU8rNI8SWtAasuoEI&ved=0CCwQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Alekseyevka%20(1200%E2%80%931000%20BCE)&f=false</ref> | ||
| The geographical extent of the culture is vast and difficult to delineate exactly. On its western fringes, it overlaps with the approximately contemporaneous, but distinct, ] in the ]-] interfluvial. To the east, it reaches into the ] depression, with some sites as far west as the southern ],<ref name=camhist>{{citation|chapter=Inner Asia at the dawn of history|last=Okladnikov|first=A. P.|title=The Cambridge history of early Inner Asia|year=1994|publisher=Cambridge Univ. Press|location=Cambridge |isbn=0-521-24304-1|pages=83}}</ref> overlapping with the area of the earlier ].<ref>{{Harvcolnb|Mallory|1989|p=62}}</ref> Additional sites are scattered as far south as the ] (]), the ] (]) and the ] (]). The northern boundary vaguely corresponds to the beginning of the ].<ref name="camhist" /> In the Volga basin, interaction with the Srubna culture was the most intense and prolonged, and Federovo style pottery is found as far west as ]. | The geographical extent of the culture is vast and difficult to delineate exactly. On its western fringes, it overlaps with the approximately contemporaneous, but distinct, ] in the ]-] interfluvial. To the east, it reaches into the ] depression, with some sites as far west as the southern ],<ref name=camhist>{{citation|chapter=Inner Asia at the dawn of history|last=Okladnikov|first=A. P.|title=The Cambridge history of early Inner Asia|year=1994|publisher=Cambridge Univ. Press|location=Cambridge |isbn=0-521-24304-1|pages=83}}</ref> overlapping with the area of the earlier ].<ref>{{Harvcolnb|Mallory|1989|p=62}}</ref> Additional sites are scattered as far south as the ] (]), the ] (]) and the ] (]). The northern boundary vaguely corresponds to the beginning of the ].<ref name="camhist" /> In the Volga basin, interaction with the Srubna culture was the most intense and prolonged, and Federovo style pottery is found as far west as ]. | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| ==Andronovo and Indo-Iranians== | ==Andronovo and Indo-Iranians== | ||
| ⚫ | {{Indo-European}} | ||
| The Andronovo culture is strongly associated with the ] and is often credited with the invention of the spoke-wheeled ] around 2000 BCE.<ref>{{Harvcolnb|Anthony|Vinogradov|1995}}</ref> Andronovo culture is also notable for regional advances in ].<ref name="camhist" /> | The Andronovo culture is strongly associated with the ] and is often credited with the invention of the spoke-wheeled ] around 2000 BCE.<ref>{{Harvcolnb|Anthony|Vinogradov|1995}}</ref> Andronovo culture is also notable for regional advances in ].<ref name="camhist" /> | ||
| ] is a site on the upper ]. It is famed for its grave-offerings, particularly ] burials. These ]s were in ] and included all or parts of animals (horse and dog) deposited into the ]. Sintashta is often pointed to as the premier proto-Indo-Iranian site, and it is conjectured that the language spoken was still in the ] stage.<ref>{{Harvcolnb|Mallory|1989}} "The settlement and cemetery of Sintashta, for example, though located far to the north on the Trans-Ural steppe, provides the type of Indo-Iranian archaeological evidence that would more than delight an archaeologist seeking their remains in Iran or India."</ref> There are similar sites "in the Volga-Ural steppe".<ref>{{Harvcolnb|Mallory|1997}}</ref> | ] is a site on the upper ]. It is famed for its grave-offerings, particularly ] burials. These ]s were in ] and included all or parts of animals (horse and dog) deposited into the ]. Sintashta is often pointed to as the premier proto-Indo-Iranian site, and it is conjectured that the language spoken was still in the ] stage.<ref>{{Harvcolnb|Mallory|1989}} "The settlement and cemetery of Sintashta, for example, though located far to the north on the Trans-Ural steppe, provides the type of Indo-Iranian archaeological evidence that would more than delight an archaeologist seeking their remains in ] or ]."</ref> There are similar sites "in the Volga-Ural steppe".<ref>{{Harvcolnb|Mallory|1997}}</ref> | ||
| The identification of Andronovo as Indo-Iranian has been challenged by scholars who point to the absence of the characteristic timber graves of the steppe south of the ].<ref>or south of the region between ] and ]-]. Francfort, in {{Harv|Fussman et al.|2005|p=268}}<br/> Fussman, in {{Harv|Fussman et al.|2005|p=220}}<br/> Francfort (1989), Fouilles de Shortugai<br/> Klejn (1974), Lyonnet (1993), Francfort (1989), Bosch-Gimpera (1973), Hiebert (1998), and Sarianidi (1993), as cited in {{Harvcoltxt|Bryant|2001|loc=ch. 10, pp. 206–207}}</ref> Sarianidi (as cited in {{Harvcolnb|Bryant|2001|p=207}}) states that "direct archaeological data from Bactria and ] show without any shade of doubt that Andronovo tribes penetrated to a minimum extent into Bactria and Margianian oases". | The identification of Andronovo as Indo-Iranian has been challenged by scholars who point to the absence of the characteristic timber graves of the steppe south of the ].<ref>or south of the region between ] and ]-]. Francfort, in {{Harv|Fussman et al.|2005|p=268}}<br/> Fussman, in {{Harv|Fussman et al.|2005|p=220}}<br/> Francfort (1989), Fouilles de Shortugai<br/> Klejn (1974), Lyonnet (1993), Francfort (1989), Bosch-Gimpera (1973), Hiebert (1998), and Sarianidi (1993), as cited in {{Harvcoltxt|Bryant|2001|loc=ch. 10, pp. 206–207}}</ref> Sarianidi (as cited in {{Harvcolnb|Bryant|2001|p=207}}) states that "direct archaeological data from Bactria and ] show without any shade of doubt that Andronovo tribes penetrated to a minimum extent into Bactria and Margianian oases". | ||
| Line 38: | Line 37: | ||
| ==Successors== | ==Successors== | ||
| In southern Siberia and Kazakhstan, the Andronovo culture was succeeded by the ] (1500–800 BCE), which is sometimes asserted to be non-Indo-European, and at other times to be specifically proto-Iranian. On its western border, it is succeeded by the ], which partly derives from the ]. The earliest historical peoples associated with the area are the ] and ]/], appearing in ]n records after the decline of the ], migrating into the ] from ca. the 9th century BCE (see also ]), and across the ] into ] and Assyria in the late 8th century BCE, and possibly also west into Europe as the ] (see ]), and the ], located by ] beyond the Danube, north of the Thracians, and by ] near the ]. Both Herodotus and Strabo identify them as Iranian. | In southern Siberia and Kazakhstan, the Andronovo culture was succeeded by the ]<ref>http://books.google.com.tr/books?id=fHYnGde4BS4C&pg=PA135&dq=Andronovo+culture+was+succeeded+by+the+Karasuk+culture&hl=tr&sa=X&ei=D2tNU4G2HsaktAbsz4C4CQ&ved=0CCwQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Andronovo%20culture%20was%20succeeded%20by%20the%20Karasuk%20culture&f=false</ref> (1500–800 BCE), which is sometimes asserted to be non-Indo-European, and at other times to be specifically proto-Iranian. On its western border, it is succeeded by the ], which partly derives from the ]. The earliest historical peoples associated with the area are the ] and ]/], appearing in ]n records after the decline of the ], migrating into the ] from ca. the 9th century BCE (see also ]), and across the ] into ] and Assyria in the late 8th century BCE, and possibly also west into Europe as the ] (see ]), and the ], located by ] beyond the Danube, north of the Thracians, and by ] near the ]. Both Herodotus and Strabo identify them as Iranian. | ||
| ==Ancient DNA== | ==Ancient DNA== | ||
| Line 45: | Line 44: | ||
| 90% of the Bronze Age period mtDNA haplogroups were of west Eurasian origin and the study determined that at least 60% of the individuals overall (out of the 26 Bronze and Iron Age human remains' samples of the study that could be tested) had light hair and blue or green eyes.<ref> C. Keyser et al. 2009. Ancient DNA provides new insights into the history of south Siberian Kurgan people. Human Genetics.</ref> | 90% of the Bronze Age period mtDNA haplogroups were of west Eurasian origin and the study determined that at least 60% of the individuals overall (out of the 26 Bronze and Iron Age human remains' samples of the study that could be tested) had light hair and blue or green eyes.<ref> C. Keyser et al. 2009. Ancient DNA provides new insights into the history of south Siberian Kurgan people. Human Genetics.</ref> | ||
| A 2004 study also established that, during the Bronze/Iron Age period, the majority of the population of ] (part of the Andronovo culture during Bronze Age), was of west Eurasian origin (with mtDNA haplogroups such as U, H, HV, T, I and W), and that prior to the thirteenth to seventh century BC, all Kazakh samples belonged to European lineages.<ref> C. Lalueza-Fox et al. 2004. ''Unravelling migrations in the steppe: mitochondrial DNA sequences from ancient central Asians''</ref> | A 2004 study also established that, during the Bronze/Iron Age period, the majority of the population of ] (part of the Andronovo culture during ]), was of west Eurasian origin (with mtDNA haplogroups such as U, H, HV, T, I and W), and that prior to the thirteenth to seventh century BC, all Kazakh samples belonged to European lineages.<ref> C. Lalueza-Fox et al. 2004. ''Unravelling migrations in the steppe: mitochondrial DNA sequences from ancient central Asians''</ref> | ||
| ⚫ | ==Notes== | ||
| ⚫ | {{reflist|2}} | ||
| ==See also== | ==See also== | ||
| * ] | * ] | ||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | * ] | ||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | * ] | ||
| * ] | * ] | ||
| Line 59: | Line 58: | ||
| * ], ] | * ], ] | ||
| * ] | * ] | ||
| ⚫ | ==Notes== | ||
| ⚫ | {{reflist|2}} | ||
| ==References== | ==References== | ||
| Line 76: | Line 78: | ||
| * (a Russian-language article by two archaeologists who directed the excavations) | * (a Russian-language article by two archaeologists who directed the excavations) | ||
| * S. Zharnikova | * S. Zharnikova | ||
| * | |||
| * | |||
| * | |||
| * | |||
| {{Bronze Age footer}} | {{Bronze Age footer}} | ||
| {{Prehistoric Asia}} | {{Prehistoric Asia}} | ||
Revision as of 18:13, 15 April 2014
| Part of a series on |
| Indo-European topics |
|---|
 |
Languages
|
| Philology |
Origins
|
|
Archaeology
Pontic Steppe Caucasus East Asia Eastern Europe Northern Europe Pontic Steppe Northern/Eastern Steppe Europe
South Asia Steppe Europe Caucasus India |
|
Peoples and societies
Indo-Aryans Iranians East Asia Europe East Asia Europe Indo-Aryan Iranian |
Religion and mythology
Others
|
Indo-European studies
|
The Andronovo culture is a collection of similar local Bronze Age Indo-Iranian and Turkic cultures that flourished ca. 1800–1400 BCE in western Siberia and the west Asiatic steppe. It is probably better termed an archaeological complex or archaeological horizon. The name derives from the village of Andronovo (55°53′N 55°42′E / 55.883°N 55.700°E / 55.883; 55.700), where in 1914, several graves were discovered, with skeletons in crouched positions, buried with richly decorated pottery. The older Sintashta culture (2100–1800), formerly included within the Andronovo culture, is now considered separately, but regarded as its predecessor, and accepted as part of the wider Andronovo horizon.
Sub-cultures have been distinguished:
- Alakul (1800–1400 BCE)
- Fedorovo (1700–1300 BCE)
- Alekseyevka (1200–1000 BCE)
The geographical extent of the culture is vast and difficult to delineate exactly. On its western fringes, it overlaps with the approximately contemporaneous, but distinct, Srubna culture in the Volga-Ural interfluvial. To the east, it reaches into the Minusinsk depression, with some sites as far west as the southern Ural Mountains, overlapping with the area of the earlier Afanasevo culture. Additional sites are scattered as far south as the Koppet Dag (Turkmenistan), the Pamir (Tajikistan) and the Tian Shan (Kyrgyzstan). The northern boundary vaguely corresponds to the beginning of the Taiga. In the Volga basin, interaction with the Srubna culture was the most intense and prolonged, and Federovo style pottery is found as far west as Volgograd.
Towards the middle of the 2nd millennium, the Andronovo cultures begin to move intensively eastwards. They mined deposits of copper ore in the Altai Mountains and lived in villages of as many as ten sunken log cabin houses measuring up to 30m by 60m in size. Burials were made in stone cists or stone enclosures with buried timber chambers.
In other respects, the economy was pastoral, based on cattle, horses, sheep, and goats. While agricultural use has been posited, no clear evidence has been presented.
Most researchers associate the Andronovo horizon with early Indo-Iranian languages, though it may have overlapped the early Uralic-speaking area at its northern fringe, including the Turkic-speaking area at its northeastern fringe.
Andronovo and Indo-Iranians
The Andronovo culture is strongly associated with the Indo-Iranians and is often credited with the invention of the spoke-wheeled chariot around 2000 BCE. Andronovo culture is also notable for regional advances in metallurgy.
Sintashta is a site on the upper Ural River. It is famed for its grave-offerings, particularly chariot burials. These inhumations were in kurgans and included all or parts of animals (horse and dog) deposited into the barrow. Sintashta is often pointed to as the premier proto-Indo-Iranian site, and it is conjectured that the language spoken was still in the Proto-Indo-Iranian stage. There are similar sites "in the Volga-Ural steppe".
The identification of Andronovo as Indo-Iranian has been challenged by scholars who point to the absence of the characteristic timber graves of the steppe south of the Oxus River. Sarianidi (as cited in Bryant 2001:207) states that "direct archaeological data from Bactria and Margiana show without any shade of doubt that Andronovo tribes penetrated to a minimum extent into Bactria and Margianian oases".
Based on its use by Indo-Aryans in Mitanni and Vedic India, its prior absence in the Near East and Harappan India, and its 16th–17th century BCE attestation at the Andronovo site of Sintashta, Kuzmina (1994) argues that the chariot corroborates the identification of Andronovo as Indo-Iranian. Klejn (1974) and Brentjes (1981) find the Andronovo culture much too late for an Indo-Iranian identification since chariot-wielding Aryans appear in Mitanni by the 15th to 16th century BCE. However, Anthony & Vinogradov (1995) dated a chariot burial at Krivoye Lake to around 2000 BCE.
Mallory (as cited in Bryant 2001:216) admits the extraordinary difficulty of making a case for expansions from Andronovo to northern India, and that attempts to link the Indo-Aryans to such sites as the Beshkent and Vakhsh cultures "only gets the Indo-Iranians to Central Asia, but not as far as the seats of the Medes, Persians or Indo-Aryans".
Eugene Helimski has suggested that the Andronovo people spoke a separate branch of the Indo-Iranian group. He claims that borrowings in the Finno-Ugric languages support this view.
Vladimir Napolskikh has proposed that borrowings in Finno-Ugric indicate that the language was specifically of the Indo-Aryan type.
Since older forms of Indo-Iranian words have been taken over in Uralic and Proto-Yeniseian, occupation by some other languages (also lost ones) cannot be ruled out altogether, at least for part of the Andronovo area: i. e., Uralic and Yeniseian.
Successors
In southern Siberia and Kazakhstan, the Andronovo culture was succeeded by the Karasuk culture (1500–800 BCE), which is sometimes asserted to be non-Indo-European, and at other times to be specifically proto-Iranian. On its western border, it is succeeded by the Srubna culture, which partly derives from the Abashevo culture. The earliest historical peoples associated with the area are the Cimmerians and Saka/Scythians, appearing in Assyrian records after the decline of the Alekseyevka culture, migrating into the Ukraine from ca. the 9th century BCE (see also Ukrainian stone stela), and across the Caucasus into Anatolia and Assyria in the late 8th century BCE, and possibly also west into Europe as the Thracians (see Thraco-Cimmerian), and the Sigynnae, located by Herodotus beyond the Danube, north of the Thracians, and by Strabo near the Caspian Sea. Both Herodotus and Strabo identify them as Iranian.
Ancient DNA
Out of 10 human male remains assigned to the Andronovo horizon from the Krasnoyarsk region, 9 possessed the R1a Y-chromosome haplogroup and one the haplogroup C-M130 (xC3). mtDNA haplogroups of nine individuals assigned to the same Andronovo horizon and region were as follows: U4 (2 individuals), U2e, U5a1, Z, T1, T4, H, and K2b.
90% of the Bronze Age period mtDNA haplogroups were of west Eurasian origin and the study determined that at least 60% of the individuals overall (out of the 26 Bronze and Iron Age human remains' samples of the study that could be tested) had light hair and blue or green eyes.
A 2004 study also established that, during the Bronze/Iron Age period, the majority of the population of Kazakhstan (part of the Andronovo culture during Bronze Age), was of west Eurasian origin (with mtDNA haplogroups such as U, H, HV, T, I and W), and that prior to the thirteenth to seventh century BC, all Kazakh samples belonged to European lineages.
See also
- BMAC
- Central Asia
- Gandhara grave culture
- Iranian peoples
- Sintashta culture
- Yaz culture
- Indo-Iranians
- Chariot, Chariot burial
- Kurgan hypothesis
Notes
- The Turks Encyclopedia, "It is hard to precisely specify the beginning of Turkish history. There is a high probability that the oldest culture of Central Asia, the so-called Anav Culture, which was unearthed at the end of toilsome archaeological and anthropological research and has a history that goes back to 4000 B.C., has ties to proto-Turks. As we move forward into the more recent millennia of history, we more clearly see the linkage between the cultures of Kelteminar and Afenesavo (3000 B.C.), Andronova (1700 B.C.), Karasuk (1200 B.C.), Tagar and Tashtyk (700 B.C.) and proto-Turks. There is plenty of scientific evidence proving this linkage, most notably among archaeological findings obtained from the Pazyryk and Issyk mounds". The Turks: Early ages, Murat Ocak: "It is reckoned that the culture of Andronovo was created by the ancestors of the Turks, who were white, horse-riders and warriors having spherical heads."
- http://books.google.com.tr/books?id=fEK-BkqXfJAC&pg=PA57&dq=Sintashta+culture+(2100%E2%80%931800&hl=tr&sa=X&ei=SWVNU9-RB8bPtAbtkICgBw&ved=0CCwQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Sintashta%20culture%20(2100%E2%80%931800&f=false
- http://books.google.com.tr/books?id=0FDqf415wqgC&pg=PA448&dq=Andronovo+area+Uralic&hl=tr&sa=X&ei=5mdNU9LbL4mjtAanhoDYBQ&ved=0CDQQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=Andronovo%20area%20Uralic&f=false
- http://books.google.com.tr/books?id=tzU3RIV2BWIC&pg=PA20&dq=Alekseyevka+(1200%E2%80%931000+BCE)&hl=tr&sa=X&ei=BWZNU8rNI8SWtAasuoEI&ved=0CCwQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Alekseyevka%20(1200%E2%80%931000%20BCE)&f=false
- ^ Okladnikov, A. P. (1994), "Inner Asia at the dawn of history", The Cambridge history of early Inner Asia, Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, p. 83, ISBN 0-521-24304-1
- Mallory 1989:62
- The Proto-Turkic Urheimat & The Early Migrations of the Turkic Peoples (Proto-Bulgaro-Turkic from the archaeological perspective), 2009-2012.
- Róna-Tas, András. “The Reconstruction of Proto-Turkic and the Genetic Question.” In: The Turkic Languages, pp. 67-80. 1998.
- Anthony & Vinogradov 1995
- Mallory 1989 "The settlement and cemetery of Sintashta, for example, though located far to the north on the Trans-Ural steppe, provides the type of Indo-Iranian archaeological evidence that would more than delight an archaeologist seeking their remains in Iran or India."
- Mallory 1997
- or south of the region between Kopet Dagh and Pamir-Karakorum. Francfort, in (Fussman et al. 2005, p. 268) harv error: no target: CITEREFFussman_et_al.2005 (help)
Fussman, in (Fussman et al. 2005, p. 220) harv error: no target: CITEREFFussman_et_al.2005 (help)
Francfort (1989), Fouilles de Shortugai
Klejn (1974), Lyonnet (1993), Francfort (1989), Bosch-Gimpera (1973), Hiebert (1998), and Sarianidi (1993), as cited in Bryant (2001, ch. 10, pp. 206–207) - Anthony & Vinogradov (1995)
Kuzmina (1994), Klejn (1974), and Brentjes (1981), as cited in Bryant (2001:206) - Helimski, Eugene. The southern neighbours of Finno-Ugrians: Iranians or an extinct branch of Aryans („Andronovo Aryans“)? – In: Finnisch-ugrische Sprachen in Kontakt. Maastricht, 1997. S. 117–125.
- Напольских В. В. Уральско-арийские взаимоотношения: история исследований, новые решения и проблемы // Индоевропейская история в свете новых исследований. М.: МГОУ, 2010. С. 229—242.
- M. Witzel – Linguistic Evidence for Cultural Exchange in Prehistoric Western Central Asia, 2003, Sino-Platonic Papers 129
- http://books.google.com.tr/books?id=fHYnGde4BS4C&pg=PA135&dq=Andronovo+culture+was+succeeded+by+the+Karasuk+culture&hl=tr&sa=X&ei=D2tNU4G2HsaktAbsz4C4CQ&ved=0CCwQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Andronovo%20culture%20was%20succeeded%20by%20the%20Karasuk%20culture&f=false
- C. Keyser et al. 2009. Ancient DNA provides new insights into the history of south Siberian Kurgan people. Human Genetics.
- C. Lalueza-Fox et al. 2004. Unravelling migrations in the steppe: mitochondrial DNA sequences from ancient central Asians
References
- Anthony, David; Vinogradov, Nikolai (1995), "Birth of the Chariot", Archaeology, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 36–41.
- Bryant, Edwin (2001), The Quest for the Origins of Vedic Culture: The Indo-Aryan Migration Debate, Oxford University Press, ISBN 0-19-513777-9.
- Diakonoff, Igor M. (1995), "Two Recent Studies of Indo-Iranian Origins", Journal of the American Oriental Society, vol. 115, no. 3, pp. 473–477, doi:10.2307/606224.
- Fussman, G.; Kellens, J.; Francfort, H.-P.; Tremblay, X.: Aryas, Aryens et Iraniens en Asie Centrale. (2005), Institut Civilisation Indienne ISBN 2-86803-072-6
- Jones-Bley, K.; Zdanovich, D. G. (eds.), Complex Societies of Central Eurasia from the 3rd to the 1st Millennium BC, 2 vols, JIES Monograph Series Nos. 45, 46, Washington D.C. (2002), ISBN 0-941694-83-6, ISBN 0-941694-86-0.
- Kuz'mina, E. E. (1994), Откуда пришли индоарии? (Whence came the Indo-Aryans), Moscow: Российская академия наук (Russian Academy of Sciences).
- Mallory, J.P. (1989), In Search of the Indo-Europeans: Language, Archaeology, and Myth, London: Thames & Hudson.
- Mallory, J. P. (1997), "Andronovo Culture", Encyclopedia of Indo-European Culture, Fitzroy Dearborn.
External links
- Center for the Study of Eurasian Nomads (csen.org)
- The Discovery of Sintashta (a Russian-language article by two archaeologists who directed the excavations)
- Archaic Motifs in North Russian Folk Embroidery and Parallels in Ancient Ornamental Designs of the Eurasian Steppe Peoples S. Zharnikova
- Encyclopedia of Indo-European Culture
- The Origin of the Indo-Iranians
- Encyclopedia of Indo-European Culture
- Indo-European Language and Culture: An Introduction
| Prehistoric Asia | |
|---|---|
| Paleolithic | |
| Neolithic | |
| Chalcolithic | |
| Bronze Age | |
