Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 02:16, 4 May 2014

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4

2013–14 UEFA Champions League knockout phase no.2

Hi. I have told you about it before.....When being in edit conflict do not override reents edits like here. Thank you. QED237 (talk) 23:48, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Saudi league

I can't read Arabic. Why does the OFFICIAL Saudi Pro league website and FIFA say Ettifaq are NOT relegated when they saw Al Shoalah are? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Weka (talk • contribs) 22:44, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

I don't know why, however all reliable Arabic sport websites has confirmed that Al-Ittifaq have been relegated from the top flight., , --Uishaki (talk) 22:51, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

But surely it can't be more official than FIFA and the OFFICIAL SPL website, no? What trumps those two websites? Nothing. Because those are about as official as you can get.... --weka (talk) 23:34, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

All sources says that Al-Ettifaq (means the agreement) are relegated to the First Division, but only few tables are incorrect.--Uishaki (talk) 23:53, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Does that matter if the official website says Al Shoulah are relegated. Those sources are unofficial. The official websites says Al Ettifaq are not relegated. Change it back or I will get the higher ups. weka (talk) 00:23, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Why do you not want to understand that the second club who relegated is Al-Ettifaq not Al-Shoalah, even the players of Ettifaq were crying here . I would not change it, and if you do that i will report you. It is not my problem that you do not know Arabic. I provided ​​many sources while you gave only two.--Uishaki (talk) 00:32, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Alright, you win. I guess you better tell FIFA.com and the official Saudi league website that they are wrong >_<. Also change this "Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored." because you know better than me. Apologies --weka (talk) 04:03, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your cooperation and also the advices.--Uishaki (talk) 04:56, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Arab Jews

I (again) undid your edit at Category:Palestinian Jews. You change a category with another one which is not equal, and not correct in itself. Also, on a procedural note, please not that per WP:BRD you should discuss any edit that is reverted rather than redoing it. Edit warring may lead to sanctions. Debresser (talk) 18:57, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

your revert

There is a reason for not showing all the villages to certain users!! Read https://en.wikipedia.org/Template_talk:Palestinian_Arab_villages_depopulated_during_the_1948_Palestinian_exodus#Blofeld_stubs

...and please revers, Cheeers, Huldra (talk) 00:00, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

The problem is in YOUR setup, probably in https://en.wikipedia.org/User:Uishaki/monobook.js

(see https://en.wikipedia.org/User:Huldra/monobook.css for my setup)

If you log out, you will note that all the villages are seen with equal color... It is rather frustrating with editors like you, who come out of the blue and make major changes to a template which you know nothing about, Cheers, Huldra (talk) 16:30, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

ok, I see you have you have edited your . User:Uishaki/monobook.js ,

Now: try to revert your edit on Template:Palestinian Arab villages depopulated during the 1948 Palestinian exodus: (I cannot do it, as I would break 1 RR), and hopefully you will see all articles which are expanded as blue, and the stubs as red. This is an extremely valuable tool for me when I have expanded these articles, basically I know that the "blue" articles (in theory) have all the different sources which I then can copy over to whatever stub I am expanding. Cheers, Huldra (talk) 19:19, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

1 RR

You have broken 1 RR on Ilan Pappé. (See the talk page). If you don´t revert, I will report you. Huldra (talk) 16:30, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting, Huldra (talk) 19:19, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Al-Arabi Sc kuwait

umm... excuse me why did you edit Al-Arabi SC when we have 56 trophies and you changed it to 55 and other edits while these events happend this year where they have one the federation cup and the volly ball league in this season and finished fifth this year — Preceding unsigned comment added by Khalid sadeq (talk • contribs) 19:04, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Because you added incorrect sentences and without any sources like

which is said to be renewed to become a much better stadium in the upcoming years but we have not heard from the Kuwait sport and youth federation from them.

--Uishaki (talk) 19:08, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

May 2014

Your recent editing history at Falafel shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
This article is under WP:1RR (one revert per editor per article per 24 hour period) restriction. To avoid remaining in violation, please self-revert. Hertz1888 (talk) 01:43, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

ARBPIA alert

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Template:Z33 — Malik Shabazz /_Stalk 02:16, 4 May 2014 (UTC)