| Revision as of 00:18, 7 May 2014 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,292,819 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:SPECIFICO/Archive 4) (bot← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:39, 8 May 2014 edit undoNetoholic (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users39,916 edits →Molyneux: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
| Just a reminder: It is banned on WP. Violators will be banned. ] (]) 06:05, 1 May 2014 (UTC) | Just a reminder: It is banned on WP. Violators will be banned. ] (]) 06:05, 1 May 2014 (UTC) | ||
| And I'm not talking about bitch or bastard. You know which word I'm talking about. It's far, far worse. ] (]) 06:06, 1 May 2014 (UTC) | And I'm not talking about bitch or bastard. You know which word I'm talking about. It's far, far worse. ] (]) 06:06, 1 May 2014 (UTC) | ||
| == Molyneux == | |||
| Writing to inform you that you should consider the Molyneux article as associated with the Mises Institute, and so falls under the provisions of your topic ban (detailed at ]. Feel free to raise concerns about future citations that are needed on the talk page. -- ] ] 18:39, 8 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:39, 8 May 2014
| This is SPECIFICO's talk page, where you can send her messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22Auto-archiving period: 31 days  |
ANI notice
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
WP:ANI Notice
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
GA reassessment for Murray Rothbard article
Murray Rothbard, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.
WP:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#WP:TPNO violation by User:SPECIFICO
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Austrian economics closed
This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:
- Pages related to the Austrian school of economics and the Ludwig von Mises Institute, broadly construed, are placed under discretionary sanctions. This sanction supersedes the existing community sanctions.
- Steeletrap (talk · contribs) is topic-banned from editing articles and other pages relating to the Austrian school of economics, the Ludwig von Mises Institute, or persons associated with them, either living or deceased. Steeletrap may request the lifting or modification of this topic-ban not less than one year from the close of this case.
- SPECIFICO (talk · contribs) is topic-banned from editing articles and other pages relating to the Ludwig von Mises Institute or persons associated with it, either living or deceased. This topic-ban does not extend to articles concerning Austrian economics but not related to the Ludwig von Mises Institute; however, should SPECIFICO edit problematically in the broader area, the topic-ban may be broadened if necessary through the discretionary sanctions. SPECIFICO may request the lifting or modification of this topic-ban not less than one year from the close of this case.
- Carolmooredc (talk · contribs) is topic-banned from editing articles and other pages relating to the Austrian school of economics, the Ludwig von Mises Institute, or persons associated with them, either living or deceased. Carolmooredc may request the lifting or modification of this topic-ban not less than one year from the close of this case.
- Editors who have not previously been involved in editing the articles at issue in this case are urged to review these articles to ensure that they are in compliance with the applicable policies and best practices, including neutrality and the policies governing biographical content.
For the Arbitration Committee, Rockfang (talk) 23:33, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
Notice of RfC and request for participation
There is an RfC in which your participation would be greatly appreciated:
Thank you. --Lightbreather (talk) 14:50, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
Notice of RfC 2 and request for participation
There is an RfC on the Gun politics in the U.S. talk page which may be of interest to editors who participated in "RfC: Remove Nazi gun control argument?" on the Gun control talk page.
Thank you. --Lightbreather (talk) 22:23, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
The B-word
Just a reminder: It is banned on WP. Violators will be banned. Steeletrap (talk) 06:05, 1 May 2014 (UTC) And I'm not talking about bitch or bastard. You know which word I'm talking about. It's far, far worse. Steeletrap (talk) 06:06, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
Molyneux
Writing to inform you that you should consider the Molyneux article as associated with the Mises Institute, and so falls under the provisions of your topic ban (detailed at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Austrian economics#SPECIFICO topic-banned. Feel free to raise concerns about future citations that are needed on the talk page. -- Netoholic @ 18:39, 8 May 2014 (UTC)