Revision as of 01:14, 27 June 2006 editRal315 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users20,640 edits →GoldToeMarionette: - Suggest e-mail.← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:48, 27 June 2006 edit undoPoolGuy (talk | contribs)308 edits one question - no answerNext edit → | ||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
::: I suggest e-mailing them if you're interested; on ] you can find e-mail links for all the Arbitration Committee members. If you're looking to get unblocked, a civil, self-written response will likely get you much further than an appeal from another user. ] (]) 01:14, 27 June 2006 (UTC) | ::: I suggest e-mailing them if you're interested; on ] you can find e-mail links for all the Arbitration Committee members. If you're looking to get unblocked, a civil, self-written response will likely get you much further than an appeal from another user. ] (]) 01:14, 27 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
::::No thanks, they don't need to have my email. ] 04:48, 27 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
==Unblock== | |||
{{unblock}} | |||
OK, here goes. I request that ] and now ] be unblocked. The GoldToeMarionette account was inappropriately blocked in March, and despite previous attempts to get it unblocked, I was pursued by a couple Admins. The RfAr recently concluded and the findings of fact clearly showed that GoldToeMarionette did not violate any policy (shown by its conspicuous absence, since that was central to my defense) . I encourage you to please read the evidence presented by user GRBerry who effectively and independently analyzed this showing I was correct that no policy violation occurred . | |||
===Please Unblock GoldToeMarionette=== | |||
This account needs to be unblocked because it did not violate policy. Its block was inappropriate. This is what I am trying to do. I am not trying to get around any ArbCom opinion. Now that seven ArbCom members couldn't find a policy violation, I think it is clear what needs to happen. | |||
===Please Unblock PoolGuy=== | |||
This account needs to be unblocked because since it is very clear that GoldToeMarionette did not violate policy, and I have only asked that this be remedied, I have not disrupted Misplaced Pages. The Admins who refuse to research and see that there was no policy violation, or even show me where a violation occurred are the ones who have created and perpetuated what some think is disruption. It is not my responsibility for the difficulty they have caused, their inability to address the original issue, and their need to pursue me rather than fix what went wrong. I don't have Admin authority, so my control rests in posting. It is up to Admins to act appropriately. Their actions to quiet me speaks to their inability to formulate a case showing the action was justified. Or perhaps they are just trying to protect their own kind when they screwed up. After all ArbCom member Jayjg was the first to mistakingly act by performing a CheckUser without basis . Later User:UninvitedCompany when faced with the same circumstance determined that it did not meet the criteria for a CheckUser to be completed . Which one of them was wrong? | |||
===Challenge to Admins who prefer to threaten me=== | |||
I am well used to some Admins ignoring the issue that GoldToeMarionette should be unblocked and accuse me of 3RR, WikiLawyering, evading a block, Harassment, SPAM, Votestacking, disruption, etc. I don't care about those invalid threats. | |||
If they want to threaten me, instead I ask that they show to me where GoldToeMarionette violated Misplaced Pages Policy that justified the Administrative Action against the account. To date no one has done that, and I know the threatening Admins have not even tried because they prefer to just threaten. I have been threatened many times and I don't care for it. I don't know what I ever did to you to deserve such lousy treatment. | |||
===Forgive the tone of this post=== | |||
I apologize for the tone of this post, however I have been treated very poorly by a few Admins who have pursued me. My communication has been constant, unblock GoldToeMarionette or show me where the administrative action was justified. I believe it is very important that Admin action be appropriate and if it is not appropriate that it be remedied. I choose not to ignore Administrative action that was wrong and I want it corrected. The RfAr vindicated me, and I want the start of this problem to be remedied, because now people treat me like dirt. I am just looking for someone to care and help, instead of those that want to threaten, block, and harass based on falsehoods and their inability to understand Misplaced Pages policy. Thank you, I look forward to your assistance. Please post here if you would like assistance researching. I am glad to help. Sorry none of the others cared to take the time. ] 04:48, 27 June 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:48, 27 June 2006
This user has been blocked indefinitely from editing Misplaced Pages, per ruling of administrators, Jimbo Wales and/or the Arbitration Committee. See the block log. |
GoldToeMarionette
- Before any such action can be taken we need a direct statement from a member of arbcom, we are not authorized to go around Arbcom -- Tawker 18:30, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
- Tawker, I see from your contribs that you did not ask for a statement from an ArbCom member. Will you or will anyone else who is watching this page inquire on my behalf, since I can only edit here. Thanks. PoolGuy 02:17, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
- I suggest e-mailing them if you're interested; on WP:AC you can find e-mail links for all the Arbitration Committee members. If you're looking to get unblocked, a civil, self-written response will likely get you much further than an appeal from another user. Ral315 (talk) 01:14, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- No thanks, they don't need to have my email. PoolGuy 04:48, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Unblock
This user is asking that their block be reviewed:
PoolGuy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Please provide a reason as to why you should be unblocked.Change
{{unblock}}
to {{unblock | reason=your reason here ~~~~}}
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=original unblock reason |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
OK, here goes. I request that User:GoldToeMarionette and now User:PoolGuy be unblocked. The GoldToeMarionette account was inappropriately blocked in March, and despite previous attempts to get it unblocked, I was pursued by a couple Admins. The RfAr recently concluded and the findings of fact clearly showed that GoldToeMarionette did not violate any policy (shown by its conspicuous absence, since that was central to my defense) . I encourage you to please read the evidence presented by user GRBerry who effectively and independently analyzed this showing I was correct that no policy violation occurred .
Please Unblock GoldToeMarionette
This account needs to be unblocked because it did not violate policy. Its block was inappropriate. This is what I am trying to do. I am not trying to get around any ArbCom opinion. Now that seven ArbCom members couldn't find a policy violation, I think it is clear what needs to happen.
Please Unblock PoolGuy
This account needs to be unblocked because since it is very clear that GoldToeMarionette did not violate policy, and I have only asked that this be remedied, I have not disrupted Misplaced Pages. The Admins who refuse to research and see that there was no policy violation, or even show me where a violation occurred are the ones who have created and perpetuated what some think is disruption. It is not my responsibility for the difficulty they have caused, their inability to address the original issue, and their need to pursue me rather than fix what went wrong. I don't have Admin authority, so my control rests in posting. It is up to Admins to act appropriately. Their actions to quiet me speaks to their inability to formulate a case showing the action was justified. Or perhaps they are just trying to protect their own kind when they screwed up. After all ArbCom member Jayjg was the first to mistakingly act by performing a CheckUser without basis . Later User:UninvitedCompany when faced with the same circumstance determined that it did not meet the criteria for a CheckUser to be completed . Which one of them was wrong?
Challenge to Admins who prefer to threaten me
I am well used to some Admins ignoring the issue that GoldToeMarionette should be unblocked and accuse me of 3RR, WikiLawyering, evading a block, Harassment, SPAM, Votestacking, disruption, etc. I don't care about those invalid threats.
If they want to threaten me, instead I ask that they show to me where GoldToeMarionette violated Misplaced Pages Policy that justified the Administrative Action against the account. To date no one has done that, and I know the threatening Admins have not even tried because they prefer to just threaten. I have been threatened many times and I don't care for it. I don't know what I ever did to you to deserve such lousy treatment.
Forgive the tone of this post
I apologize for the tone of this post, however I have been treated very poorly by a few Admins who have pursued me. My communication has been constant, unblock GoldToeMarionette or show me where the administrative action was justified. I believe it is very important that Admin action be appropriate and if it is not appropriate that it be remedied. I choose not to ignore Administrative action that was wrong and I want it corrected. The RfAr vindicated me, and I want the start of this problem to be remedied, because now people treat me like dirt. I am just looking for someone to care and help, instead of those that want to threaten, block, and harass based on falsehoods and their inability to understand Misplaced Pages policy. Thank you, I look forward to your assistance. Please post here if you would like assistance researching. I am glad to help. Sorry none of the others cared to take the time. PoolGuy 04:48, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Categories: