Revision as of 20:02, 21 June 2006 editMets501 (talk | contribs)24,644 edits clean up + iff --> if and only if using AWB← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:24, 27 June 2006 edit undoSilly rabbit (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users18,834 edits +catNext edit → | ||
Line 87: | Line 87: | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | ] |
Revision as of 05:24, 27 June 2006
In differential geometry, the holonomy group of a connection on a vector bundle over a smooth manifold M is the group of linear transformations induced by parallel transport around closed loops in M. There is an analogous notion for connections on principal bundles over M. The holonomy group of a connection is intimately associated with the curvature of that connection.
The holonomy group of a Riemannian manifold M is the holonomy group of the Levi-Civita connection on the tangent bundle of M.
On vector bundles
Let E be a rank k vector bundle over a smooth manifold M and let ∇ be a connection on E. Given a piecewise smooth loop γ : → M based at x in M, the connection defines a parallel transport map . This map is both linear and invertible and so defines an element of GL(Ex). The holonomy group of ∇ based at x is defined as
The local holonomy group based at x is the subgroup coming from contractible loops γ.
If M is connected then the holonomy group depends on the basepoint x only up to conjugation in GL(k, R). Explicitly, if γ is a path from x to y in M then
Choosing different identifications of Ex with R also gives conjugate subgroups. It is therefore customary to drop reference to the basepoint with the understanding that the definition is good up to conjugation.
Some important properties of holonomy group include:
- Hol(∇) is a connected, Lie subgroup of GL(k, R).
- Hol(∇) is the identity component of Hol(∇).
- There is a natural, surjective group homomorphism π1(M) → Hol(∇)/Hol(∇) where π1(M) is the fundamental group of M which sends the homotopy class to the coset Pγ·Hol(∇).
- If M is simply connected then Hol(∇) = Hol(∇).
- ∇ is flat (i.e. has vanishing curvature) if and only if Hol(∇) is trivial.
See also Wilson loop.
Riemannian holonomy groups
The holonomy of a Riemannian manifold (M, g) is the just holonomy group of the Levi-Civita connection on the tangent bundle to M. A 'generic' n-dimensional Riemannian manifold has an O(n) holonomy, or SO(n) if it is orientable. Manifolds whose holonomy groups are proper subgroups of O(n) or SO(n) have special properties.
In 1955, M. Berger gave a complete classification of possible holonomy groups for simply connected, Riemannian manifolds which are irreducible (not locally a product space) and nonsymmetric (not locally a Riemannian symmetric space). Berger's list is as follows:
Hol(g) | dim(M) | Type of manifold | Comments |
---|---|---|---|
SO(n) | n | generic | |
U(n) | 2n | Kähler manifold | Kähler |
SU(n) | 2n | Calabi-Yau manifold | Ricci-flat, Kähler |
Sp(n)·Sp(1) | 4n | quaternionic Kähler manifold | Einstein |
Sp(n) | 4n | hyperkähler manifold | Ricci-flat, Kähler |
G2 | 7 | G2 manifold | Ricci-flat |
Spin(7) | 8 | Spin(7) manifold | Ricci-flat |
It is now known that all of these possibilities occur as holonomy groups of Riemannian manifolds. The last two exceptional cases were the most difficult to find.
The strange list above was explained by Simons's proof of Berger's theorem. One first shows that if a Riemannian manifold is not a locally symmetric space and the reduced holonomy acts irreducibly on the tangent space, then it acts transitively on the unit sphere. The Lie groups acting transitively on spheres are known: they consist of the list above, together with 2 extra cases: the group Spin(9) acting on R, and the group T.Sp(m) acting on R. Finally one checks that the first of these two extra cases only occurs as a holonomy group for locally symmetric spaces (that are locally isomorphic to the Cayley projective plane), and the second does not occur at all as a holonomy group.
Riemannian symmetric spaces, which are locally isometric to homogeneous spaces have local holonomy isomorphic to . These too have been completely classified.
Special holonomy manifolds in string theory
Riemannian manifolds with special holonomy play an important role in string theory compactifications. This is because special holonomy manifolds admit covariantly constant (parallel) spinors and thus preserve some fraction of the original supersymmetry. Most important are compactifications on Calabi-Yau manifolds with SU(2) or SU(3) holonomy. Also important are compactifications on G2 manifolds. See G(2) holonomy on arxiv.org
On principal bundles
The definition for holonomy of connections on principal bundles proceeds in parallel fashion. Let P be a principal G-bundle over a smooth manifold M for some Lie group G and let ω be a connection on P. Given a piecewise smooth loop γ : → M based at x in M and a point p in the fiber over x the connection defines a unique horizontal lift such that . The end point of the horizontal lift, , will not generally be p but rather some other point p·g in the fiber over x. Define an equivalence relation ~ on P by saying that p~q if they can be joined by a piecewise smooth horizontal path in P.
The holonomy group of ω based at p is then defined as
The local holonomy group based at p is the subgroup coming from horizontal lifts of contractible loops γ.
If M and P are connected then the holonomy group depends on the basepoint p only up to conjugation in G. Explicitly,
Moreover if p~q the Holp(ω) = Holq(ω). It is therefore customary to drop reference to the basepoint with the understanding that the definition is good up to conjugation.
Some important properties of holonomy group include:
- Hol(ω) is a connected, Lie subgroup of G.
- Hol(ω) is the identity component of Hol(ω).
- There is a natural, surjective group homomorphism π1(M) → Hol(ω)/Hol(ω).
- If M is simply connected then Hol(ω) = Hol(ω).
- ω is flat (i.e. has vanishing curvature) if and only if Hol(ω) is trivial.
Reference
- Joyce, Compact Manifolds with Special Holonomy, Oxford University Press, 2000. ISBN 0-19-850601-5.
External link
- Chi, Merkulov, and Schwachhöfer, On the incompleteness of Berger's list, arXiv:dg-ga/9508014.