Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Kenneth Wapnick: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:57, 27 June 2006 editTree Biting Conspiracy (talk | contribs)Rollbackers13,692 editsm []← Previous edit Revision as of 09:17, 27 June 2006 edit undoCoredesat (talk | contribs)22,795 edits []Next edit →
Line 20: Line 20:
'''and serves only to further promote non-notable topics rather than to report what is notable.''' ] 05:42, 27 June 2006 (UTC) '''and serves only to further promote non-notable topics rather than to report what is notable.''' ] 05:42, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
*Article seems to have a bit of ] as well, evidenced by statements such as "the ever-growing popularity of ACIM seemed to know no bounds." Wapnick seems to be notable only for his role of editing segments of ] and heading ] but not much for anything else, thus I suggest the article to be '''redirected'''/'''merged''' to ]--]<small><font color="red">]</font></small> 05:54, 27 June 2006 (UTC) *Article seems to have a bit of ] as well, evidenced by statements such as "the ever-growing popularity of ACIM seemed to know no bounds." Wapnick seems to be notable only for his role of editing segments of ] and heading ] but not much for anything else, thus I suggest the article to be '''redirected'''/'''merged''' to ]--]<small><font color="red">]</font></small> 05:54, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
*'''Merge''' and '''redirect''' to ] per above. --''']''' <small>]</small> 09:17, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:17, 27 June 2006


Kenneth Wapnick

Reason this article should be deleted:

This article has been determined to be noncompliant to Misplaced Pages content policy as discussed in it's Analysis for Deletion based on :

  • WP:NOR - Articles may not contain any previously unpublished theories, data, statements, concepts, arguments, or ideas; or any new analysis or synthesis of published data, statements, concepts, arguments, or ideas that serves to advance a position.
  • WP:VER - Information on Misplaced Pages must be reliable. Facts, viewpoints, theories, and arguments may only be included in articles if they have already been published by reliable and reputable sources. Articles should cite these sources whenever possible. Any unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
  • WP:NPOV - This article is not written from the neutral point of view, and appears to hope to advertise the external links, rather than to use them as sources of information.
  • WP:NOT - Misplaced Pages is not a soapbox or a vehicle for propaganda and advertising. Therefore, Misplaced Pages articles are not propaganda or advocacy of any kind.
  • WP:NOT - Misplaced Pages is not a place to publish original thoughts and analyses.

using guidelines:

  • WP:BIO - The subject of this article fails to meet criteria testing whether a person has sufficient external notice to ensure that they can be covered from a neutral point of view based on verifiable information from reliable sources, without straying into original research.

and serves only to further promote non-notable topics rather than to report what is notable. Ste4k 05:42, 27 June 2006 (UTC)