| Revision as of 08:26, 27 June 2006 editCoredesat (talk | contribs)22,795 edits →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:23, 27 June 2006 edit undoCoredesat (talk | contribs)22,795 edits →[]Next edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| Topic matter is ] having no ] per ]. This slightly appears to be a vanity page used to support a book which hasn't received multiple awards. Without references the article is original research at best, and it does not '''establish''' any sort of notability that can be referenced about this author. ] 07:28, 27 June 2006 (UTC) | Topic matter is ] having no ] per ]. This slightly appears to be a vanity page used to support a book which hasn't received multiple awards. Without references the article is original research at best, and it does not '''establish''' any sort of notability that can be referenced about this author. ] 07:28, 27 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :*'''Keep'''. Err, the guy's book's sales rank on Amazon is 1,313, which is pretty hefty; there's nothing in WP:BIO that requires books to win multiple awards for their authors to be notable. I agree that the article needs considerable cleanup to be worth much as biography (heck, his Amazon profile has more bio info), but this certainly clears the ] bar and by a good bit. ] 08:07, 27 June 2006 (UTC) | :*'''Keep'''. Err, the guy's book's sales rank on Amazon is 1,313, which is pretty hefty; there's nothing in WP:BIO that requires books to win multiple awards for their authors to be notable. I agree that the article needs considerable cleanup to be worth much as biography (heck, his Amazon profile has more bio info), but this certainly clears the ] bar and by a good bit. ] 08:07, 27 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Weak keep''', appears to be at least marginally notable per ]. --''']''' <small>]</small> 08:26, 27 June 2006 (UTC) | *<s>'''Weak keep''', appears to be at least marginally notable per ]. --''']''' <small>]</small> 08:26, 27 June 2006 (UTC)</s> | ||
| *'''Delete'''. After double-checking, seems to fail ] - only 429 ''unique'' Google hits, and no mentions in any notable media. --''']''' <small>]</small> 09:23, 27 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:23, 27 June 2006
Gary Renard
Topic matter is unverifiable having no reliable published source per Item 6.3. This slightly appears to be a vanity page used to support a book which hasn't received multiple awards. Without references the article is original research at best, and it does not establish any sort of notability that can be referenced about this author. Ste4k 07:28, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Err, the guy's book's sales rank on Amazon is 1,313, which is pretty hefty; there's nothing in WP:BIO that requires books to win multiple awards for their authors to be notable. I agree that the article needs considerable cleanup to be worth much as biography (heck, his Amazon profile has more bio info), but this certainly clears the WP:BIO bar and by a good bit. RGTraynor 08:07, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Weak keep, appears to be at least marginally notable per WP:BIO. --Coredesat talk 08:26, 27 June 2006 (UTC)- Delete. After double-checking, seems to fail WP:BIO - only 429 unique Google hits, and no mentions in any notable media. --Coredesat talk 09:23, 27 June 2006 (UTC)