| Revision as of 02:24, 28 June 2006 editRadioKirk (talk | contribs)18,518 edits →Changing users' signatures: settlement of what?← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:31, 28 June 2006 edit undoPete Peters (talk | contribs)1,075 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
| :Explain with evidence, please. <tt style="color:#161;">RadioKirk<small> (]|]|])</small></tt> 02:24, 28 June 2006 (UTC) | :Explain with evidence, please. <tt style="color:#161;">RadioKirk<small> (]|]|])</small></tt> 02:24, 28 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
| He just deleted from his blog. But he reached an out of court settlement, and part of the deal was that he not write about Warren Kinsella and vice versa. He posted the agreement on his blog, but has since deleted it. | |||
| I really don't care that he uses an alias, and maybe I was wrong to put it on his Wiki entry. But then calling it vandalism really offended me. The fact you can be accused of such activity is offensuve. The on the Warren Kinsella page, I took out his name, like many other people have done, and he all of sudden accuses me of vandalism again.] | |||
Revision as of 02:31, 28 June 2006
I do not touch your talk page, you don't touch mine. Got it Arthur.
Arthur Ellis
Hey Pete, I see you have accused Arthur Ellis of being a sockpuppet. I though he might be as well because his very first edit was to ceraurus's talk page and the fact he edits all the same pages that ceraurus editted. However, adding unverifiable info to Mark Bourrie's page is totally uncool. I direct you to Misplaced Pages:Suspected sock puppets or Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser where you can make a formal complaint. Good luck Geedubber 16:34, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
It was uncool, but Mark Bourrie should not lie about his Wiki accounts. Thanks Geedubber for pointing out the Sock Puppet tribunel process. I shall persue. Pete Peters
I have been making edits for a while, but only the other day was I asked to join the Wiki family. So my IP was use instead of a name Arthur..errrr.... Mark Bourrie
Pete Peters
Right. All you've done is vandalise.Arthur Ellis 21:55, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- RFCU was declined. Now drop it please. - CrazyRussian talk/email 22:24, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- You have come close to crossing the 3RR line, but did not. Please take this as a severe warning: do NOT conduct edit wars on Misplaced Pages. Arthur Ellis has been blocked for 24 hours for violating 3RR - but it doesn't mean I like your position any better than his. The war will now stop - because one of the participants is blocked. When you come back, please work out your differences on the talk page and consider the services of WP:3O. - CrazyRussian talk/email 02:05, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
Changing users' signatures
Absent evidence from CheckUser—and with it, for that matter—altering a user's signature is vandalism. Please stop. RadioKirk (u|t|c) 02:14, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
Okay I will. He is using an alias to avoid breaching an out of court agreement. Pete Peters
- Explain with evidence, please. RadioKirk (u|t|c) 02:24, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
He just deleted from his blog. But he reached an out of court settlement, and part of the deal was that he not write about Warren Kinsella and vice versa. He posted the agreement on his blog, but has since deleted it.
I really don't care that he uses an alias, and maybe I was wrong to put it on his Wiki entry. But then calling it vandalism really offended me. The fact you can be accused of such activity is offensuve. The on the Warren Kinsella page, I took out his name, like many other people have done, and he all of sudden accuses me of vandalism again.Pete Peters