Revision as of 23:35, 22 May 2014 editIan.thomson (talk | contribs)58,562 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:37, 22 May 2014 edit undoIan.thomson (talk | contribs)58,562 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
] You may be '''] without further warning''' the next time you add ] material to Misplaced Pages, as you did at ]. <!-- Template:uw-unsourced4 --> ] (]) 23:35, 22 May 2014 (UTC) | ] You may be '''] without further warning''' the next time you add ] material to Misplaced Pages, as you did at ]. <!-- Template:uw-unsourced4 --> ] (]) 23:35, 22 May 2014 (UTC) | ||
] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. | |||
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 23:37, 22 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Regarding "nonsense" == | |||
You're the one spreading nonsense. Cite a source or leave the site alone. I've seen children who understand that much, and yet you don't seem to get it. What's your problem? ] (]) 23:37, 22 May 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:37, 22 May 2014
May 2014
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Hayk, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Misplaced Pages:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 17:27, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Orion (constellation). This contravenes Misplaced Pages's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Ian.thomson (talk) 23:33, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for trying to keep Misplaced Pages free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism, such as the edit at Orion (constellation), are not considered vandalism under Misplaced Pages policy. Misplaced Pages has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage editors. Please read Misplaced Pages:NOTVAND for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 23:35, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Misplaced Pages, as you did at Orion (constellation). Ian.thomson (talk) 23:35, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Orion (constellation) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Ian.thomson (talk) 23:37, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
Regarding "nonsense"
You're the one spreading nonsense. Cite a source or leave the site alone. I've seen children who understand that much, and yet you don't seem to get it. What's your problem? Ian.thomson (talk) 23:37, 22 May 2014 (UTC)