| Revision as of 10:18, 14 January 2011 editXqbot (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,325,217 editsm Bot: Fixing double redirect to Copycat crime← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:16, 3 June 2014 edit undoPaulusthewalrus (talk | contribs)5 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Proposed deletion/dated | |||
| |concern = the word Pertemps is unrelated to copycat crime | |||
| |timestamp = 20140603111638 | |||
| }} | |||
| #REDIRECT ] | #REDIRECT ] | ||
Revision as of 11:16, 3 June 2014
It is proposed that this article be deleted because of the following concern:
If you can address this concern by improving, copyediting, sourcing, renaming, or merging the page, please edit this page and do so. You may remove this message if you improve the article or otherwise object to deletion for any reason. Although not required, you are encouraged to explain why you object to the deletion, either in your edit summary or on the talk page. If this template is removed, do not replace it. This message has remained in place for seven days, so the article may be deleted without further notice. Find sources: "Pertemps" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTORPRODExpired+%5B%5BWP%3APROD%7CPROD%5D%5D%2C+concern+was%3A+the+word+Pertemps+is+unrelated+to+copycat+crimeExpired ], concern was: the word Pertemps is unrelated to copycat crime Nominator: Please consider notifying the author/project: {{subst:proposed deletion notify|Pertemps|concern=the word Pertemps is unrelated to copycat crime}} ~~~~Timestamp: 20140603111638 11:16, 3 June 2014 (UTC) Administrators: delete |
- REDIRECT Copycat crime