| Revision as of 14:12, 6 June 2014 editCatflap08 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,144 edits →"Nationalist"?← Previous edit |
Revision as of 14:14, 6 June 2014 edit undo126.0.96.220 (talk) →"Nationalist"?Next edit → |
| Line 17: |
Line 17: |
|
::The reliable sources all state that he was a member of a religious group. I've read numerous books and articles that state he adhered strongly to the religious views of this group. None of them mentioned the politics of the group, or hinted that he himself shared the ''political'' views of the group's leaders. The only source that ''does'' imply he shared these views also admits openly that this is a minority view. |
|
::The reliable sources all state that he was a member of a religious group. I've read numerous books and articles that state he adhered strongly to the religious views of this group. None of them mentioned the politics of the group, or hinted that he himself shared the ''political'' views of the group's leaders. The only source that ''does'' imply he shared these views also admits openly that this is a minority view. |
|
::] (]) 14:10, 6 June 2014 (UTC) |
|
::] (]) 14:10, 6 June 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
::(EDIT CONFLICT) Why did you ] me again without trying to discuss here first? ] says that the burden is on the party wishing to add information to the article that to find source that specifically support said information. I provided a coherent argument that your sources do ''not'' support your claim but in fact ''contradict'' your claim. ] (]) 14:14, 6 June 2014 (UTC) |
|
Follow the procedure so far you deletion is nothing else than a private opinion. --] (]) 14:12, 6 June 2014 (UTC) |
|
Follow the procedure so far you deletion is nothing else than a private opinion. --] (]) 14:12, 6 June 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
:Again, per ]: please provide a source that actually supports the claim you are trying to add to the article. ] (]) 14:14, 6 June 2014 (UTC) |
I removed the unqualified claim that he was a "nationalist" from the intro. One of the two sources cited was a 2006 PhD dissertation that was about about a religious and quasi-political ideology with which he was affiliated. The problem is that even though that source appears to be, in its brief coverage of the subject of this article, directly associating Kenji's politics with those of his co-religionists, it also specifies that hardly any other reliable sources make this connection. This means that the source is not sufficient for the claim that "Kenji Miyazawa was a nationalist"; it is sufficient for the statement "A minority of scholars have attributed nationalistic leanings to Miyazawa". The view is WP:FRINGE. I don't mean "fringe" in a derogatory sense. I just mean it is a view that is "not widely held among the academic community yet". Kenji scholars can duke this issue out in journal articles and scholarly books. If at some point the scholarly consensus becomes "Kenji was a nationalist" (i.e., a scholar makes the specific claim that this is the consensus view and is not called out by his/her peers) then we can add this statement to the article. 126.0.96.220 (talk) 13:42, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
