Misplaced Pages

:Requests for checkuser/Case/General Tojo: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser | Case Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:11, 29 June 2006 edit88.106.213.233 (talk) →General Tojo← Previous edit Revision as of 15:32, 29 June 2006 edit undoThatcher (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users28,287 edits →General Tojo: moved comment, removed boldfaceNext edit →
Line 22: Line 22:
*:{{clerknote}} Excessive strong/bold text de-bolded. General Tojo was indeed indef blocked for "''disruption''". ] 23:28, 26 June 2006 (UTC) *:{{clerknote}} Excessive strong/bold text de-bolded. General Tojo was indeed indef blocked for "''disruption''". ] 23:28, 26 June 2006 (UTC)


⚫ '''DOUBLE STANDARDS :'''
⚫ '''Isn't it strange that some people describe any alterations or reverts they make, no matter how counterproductive, as improvements. If somebody does exactly the same to what they have written they describe it as vandalism, warring and disruption. Intolerant and deludued people ! What puzzles me is this word banned. As I add to Misplaced Pages more than a dozen times a day in various names and with various IP addresses does that really constitute a ban ??? I only use the General Tojo guise when I want to make it very obvious how completely powerless the intolerants on this site are. And no, Kevin (fail to get your facts right) Breitenstein it was because I used (at random) a Japanese pseudonym. I questioned the decision which unable tp provide answers they then described as disruption. General Tojo'''


**There is a new page on Tojo: Category:Suspected Misplaced Pages sockpuppets of General Tojo. Not sure if these sockpuppets need to be checked or not since they are so obvious. ] 15:38, 27 June 2006 (UTC) **There is a new page on Tojo: Category:Suspected Misplaced Pages sockpuppets of General Tojo. Not sure if these sockpuppets need to be checked or not since they are so obvious. ] 15:38, 27 June 2006 (UTC)


{{Confirmed}} ] ] 23:11, 28 June 2006 (UTC) {{Confirmed}} ] ] 23:11, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

⚫ *DOUBLE STANDARDS
⚫ *Isn't it strange that some people describe any alterations or reverts they make, no matter how counterproductive, as improvements. If somebody does exactly the same to what they have written they describe it as vandalism, warring and disruption. Intolerant and deludued people ! What puzzles me is this word banned. As I add to Misplaced Pages more than a dozen times a day in various names and with various IP addresses does that really constitute a ban ??? I only use the General Tojo guise when I want to make it very obvious how completely powerless the intolerants on this site are. And no, Kevin (fail to get your facts right) Breitenstein it was because I used (at random) a Japanese pseudonym. I questioned the decision which unable tp provide answers they then described as disruption. General Tojo {{unsigned|88.106.213.233}}

Revision as of 15:32, 29 June 2006

General Tojo

General Tojo was blocked for edit warring and disruption on Parkinson's disease and took to continuing to disrupt from IPs in the 88.104.0.0/13 range. After I semi-protected the article to stop the ongoing problems, the three users above showed up to continue with similar changes. GraemeL 14:13, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

I've blocked Hirohito indefinitely for incendiary username, and Parkinsons for 48h for sockpuppeting using the Hirohito account. Their style (and choice of subject) is identical. A range block may become necessary if the disruption does not cease. JFW | T@lk 15:48, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

That's a deliberately false statement. General Tojo was blocked for the username. It was claimed to be not allowed, and so resulted in a blocking without complying with Wii requirements first. What you describe as warring and disruption was making improvements to the PD site. You specifically thanked me for making them !!! However, you obviousy have double standards. When you or somebody you agree with makes changes no matter how stupied you allow them. When I do exactly the same you desribe it as vandalaism or warring. You have obvious double standards depending on what suits your personal interest and prejudices. General Tojo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.106.216.81 (talk • contribs)

That user's only edits are in violating WP:NPA on two pages. I took the liberty of adding that address to your list of IP addresses since he claims to be Tojo. All of the contributions follow exactly the same style of writing, commenting, editwarring, 3RR violations, Personal Attacks, Bold Prefacing, massive editing, etc, along with claiming to be Tojo himself on talk pages without signing his name with tildes. Sincerely, Logical2u (Wikibreak) 19:31, 26 June 2006 (UTC)


 Confirmed Mackensen (talk) 23:11, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

  • DOUBLE STANDARDS
  • Isn't it strange that some people describe any alterations or reverts they make, no matter how counterproductive, as improvements. If somebody does exactly the same to what they have written they describe it as vandalism, warring and disruption. Intolerant and deludued people ! What puzzles me is this word banned. As I add to Misplaced Pages more than a dozen times a day in various names and with various IP addresses does that really constitute a ban ??? I only use the General Tojo guise when I want to make it very obvious how completely powerless the intolerants on this site are. And no, Kevin (fail to get your facts right) Breitenstein it was because I used (at random) a Japanese pseudonym. I questioned the decision which unable tp provide answers they then described as disruption. General Tojo — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.106.213.233 (talk • contribs)