| Revision as of 20:51, 28 June 2006 edit81.129.155.181 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:18, 29 June 2006 edit undoChrisO~enwiki (talk | contribs)43,032 edits Some thoughts on the Monday Club-related articlesNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| Chelsea Tory hello! You're more than right. ] 20:51, 28 June 2006 (UTC) | Chelsea Tory hello! You're more than right. ] 20:51, 28 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
| I think your claims that a Marxist/leftist conspiracy is out to nobble the biographies of right-wingers are a bit misplaced. As an experienced Wikipedian and an administrator who's not been involved in any of the Monday Club-related articles before now, I've had a look at them with what I hope you'll accept are unprejudiced eyes. And I have to say that many of the articles are problematic - many of the subjects don't meet Misplaced Pages's biographical notability criteria (]), the articles are stuffed with trivia such as who went to which dinner, they aren't referenced and they're not particularly neutral. Please bear in mind that ]. -- ] 19:18, 29 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:18, 29 June 2006
Now that's just absurd. 15:06, 24 June 2006 (UTC).
Chelsea Tory hello! You're more than right. 81.129.155.181 20:51, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
I think your claims that a Marxist/leftist conspiracy is out to nobble the biographies of right-wingers are a bit misplaced. As an experienced Wikipedian and an administrator who's not been involved in any of the Monday Club-related articles before now, I've had a look at them with what I hope you'll accept are unprejudiced eyes. And I have to say that many of the articles are problematic - many of the subjects don't meet Misplaced Pages's biographical notability criteria (WP:BIO), the articles are stuffed with trivia such as who went to which dinner, they aren't referenced and they're not particularly neutral. Please bear in mind that Misplaced Pages is not an indiscriminate collection of information. -- ChrisO 19:18, 29 June 2006 (UTC)