Revision as of 18:12, 11 June 2014 editNoisemonkey (talk | contribs)86 edits →Vandalism← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:53, 11 June 2014 edit undoG S Palmer (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers27,891 edits →Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
ok no worries. It was a tantrum I was simply trying to resubmit using the guidelines. I'll wait to see what happens in the chat/dispute | ok no worries. It was a tantrum I was simply trying to resubmit using the guidelines. I'll wait to see what happens in the chat/dispute | ||
== ] == | |||
] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. ] <small>(] • ])</small> 19:53, 11 June 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:53, 11 June 2014
AfD nomination of Drumfunk
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Drumfunk. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Misplaced Pages:Notability and "What Misplaced Pages is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Drumfunk. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
Do not re-file edit warring reports after a week
Your first report was declined due to being malformed, but it would have been dismissed even if you had followed the page's instructions correctly because you reported someone who only reverted three times (not more than three times). Your second report on the same incident comes across as a petty tantrum, because:
- it's been almost a week,
- you did not warn Catflap08 about edit warring before filing the report,
- you did not notify Catflap08 about the report after you filed it.
Ian.thomson (talk) 22:07, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
ok no worries. It was a tantrum I was simply trying to resubmit using the guidelines. I'll wait to see what happens in the chat/dispute
Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 19:53, 11 June 2014 (UTC)