| Revision as of 19:53, 11 June 2014 editG S Palmer (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers27,891 edits →Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:56, 11 June 2014 edit undoJohn Carter (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users176,670 edits →June 2014: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
| ] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. ] <small>(] • ])</small> 19:53, 11 June 2014 (UTC) | ] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. ] <small>(] • ])</small> 19:53, 11 June 2014 (UTC) | ||
| == June 2014 == | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. | |||
| To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 19:56, 11 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:56, 11 June 2014
AfD nomination of Drumfunk
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Drumfunk. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Misplaced Pages:Notability and "What Misplaced Pages is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Drumfunk. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
Do not re-file edit warring reports after a week
Your first report was declined due to being malformed, but it would have been dismissed even if you had followed the page's instructions correctly because you reported someone who only reverted three times (not more than three times). Your second report on the same incident comes across as a petty tantrum, because:
- it's been almost a week,
- you did not warn Catflap08 about edit warring before filing the report,
- you did not notify Catflap08 about the report after you filed it.
Ian.thomson (talk) 22:07, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
ok no worries. It was a tantrum I was simply trying to resubmit using the guidelines. I'll wait to see what happens in the chat/dispute
Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 19:53, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
June 2014
Your recent editing history at Nichiren Shoshu shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. John Carter (talk) 19:56, 11 June 2014 (UTC)