Revision as of 04:38, 11 June 2014 editEdJohnston (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators71,204 edits →Please self-revert: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:45, 11 June 2014 edit undoHuldra (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers83,874 edits →Previous account?: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
You are back again at ] with with no evidence that anyone supports your view on the talk page. The AE was closed with no action on the assumption that you would be more careful in the future. If you don't self revert a block for the original 1RR violation may be necessary. ] (]) 04:38, 11 June 2014 (UTC) | You are back again at ] with with no evidence that anyone supports your view on the talk page. The AE was closed with no action on the assumption that you would be more careful in the future. If you don't self revert a block for the original 1RR violation may be necessary. ] (]) 04:38, 11 June 2014 (UTC) | ||
== Previous account? == | |||
May I ask if you have previously edited Misplaced Pages, and if so, under which account-name? Cheers, ] (]) 21:45, 11 June 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:45, 11 June 2014
Hi! Welcome
I have requested enforcement of the active arbitration remedy of 1RR restriction on Operation Defensive Shield per your two reverts on june 7,
I have requested enforcement of arbitration remedies for article Operation Defensive Shield as part of the israel palestine arbitration agreement. WP:AETeeTylerToe (talk) 14:42, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- It seems you have broken the WP:1RR restriction at Operation Defensive Shield on June 7. Please respond to the AE complaint and explain why you shouldn't be blocked. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 16:38, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Operation Defensive Shield is covered by discretionary sanctions under WP:ARBPIA
Please carefully read this information:The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.Template:Z33 If you have concerns about the neutrality of this article you are expected to participate on the talk page. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 02:49, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
Please self-revert
You are back again at Operation Defensive Shield with a new revert to your preferred version of the article with no evidence that anyone supports your view on the talk page. The AE was closed with no action on the assumption that you would be more careful in the future. If you don't self revert a block for the original 1RR violation may be necessary. EdJohnston (talk) 04:38, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
Previous account?
May I ask if you have previously edited Misplaced Pages, and if so, under which account-name? Cheers, Huldra (talk) 21:45, 11 June 2014 (UTC)