| Revision as of 00:34, 24 June 2014 editHerbxue (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,206 edits →Edit warring at Acupuncture: pot calling...← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:22, 24 June 2014 edit undoMilliongoldcoinpoint (talk | contribs)91 edits →Edit warring at AcupunctureNext edit → | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. ] (]) 23:07, 23 June 2014 (UTC) | To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. ] (]) 23:07, 23 June 2014 (UTC) | ||
| ::fyi Quack Guru was recently topic banned from acupuncture and is generally the source of all edit wars there so pay no mind to the bites.] (]) 00:34, 24 June 2014 (UTC) | ::fyi Quack Guru was recently topic banned from acupuncture and is generally the source of all edit wars there so pay no mind to the bites.] (]) 00:34, 24 June 2014 (UTC) | ||
| :::yeah, I started to assume he might be a problem editor and then I looked at his history. I see he's been banned many times for violating many different rules. I think ignoring him is a good idea. ] (]) 02:22, 24 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:22, 24 June 2014
Notification
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding pseudoscience and fringe science, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.QuackGuru (talk) 21:09, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
Edit warring at Acupuncture
Your recent editing history at Acupuncture shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. QuackGuru (talk) 23:07, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
- fyi Quack Guru was recently topic banned from acupuncture and is generally the source of all edit wars there so pay no mind to the bites.Herbxue (talk) 00:34, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- yeah, I started to assume he might be a problem editor and then I looked at his history. I see he's been banned many times for violating many different rules. I think ignoring him is a good idea. Milliongoldcoinpoint (talk) 02:22, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- fyi Quack Guru was recently topic banned from acupuncture and is generally the source of all edit wars there so pay no mind to the bites.Herbxue (talk) 00:34, 24 June 2014 (UTC)