| Revision as of 22:06, 24 June 2014 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,292,502 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Tomobe03/Archive02) (bot← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:07, 27 June 2014 edit undoDemiurge1000 (talk | contribs)26,944 edits →A barnstar for you!: new WikiLove messageTag: WikiLoveNext edit → | ||
| Line 107: | Line 107: | ||
| </div> | </div> | ||
| <!-- EdwardsBot 0700 --> | <!-- EdwardsBot 0700 --> | ||
| == A barnstar for you! == | |||
| {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Tireless Contributor Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | For your constant and long-standing efforts to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of the late unpleasantness in the former Yugoslavia --] (]) 21:07, 27 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
Revision as of 21:07, 27 June 2014
 Archives |
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Your GA nomination of Lovas massacre
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lovas massacre you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 04:50, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Lovas massacre
The article Lovas massacre you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Lovas massacre for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 04:20, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Lovas massacre
The article Lovas massacre you nominated as a good article has failed 
; see Talk:Lovas massacre for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 15:21, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
Re: WikiLibrary
Well, normally I'd be quite interested, but for me it would be difficult not to use the access granted to me knowing that someone else could have got it had I not applied. In a way, it almost creates a commitment (even if the number of accounts is not limited), and I've been trying - especially lately, since my "unretirement" - to disengage a bit from wikiwork. It's working out just fine for me at the moment, so why risk it? :) Thanks for dropping a note! GregorB (talk) 10:49, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Atlantic Grupa for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Atlantic Grupa is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Atlantic Grupa until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 22:28, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
You've got mail!
Message added 02:43, 15 May 2014 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Nikkimaria (talk) 02:43, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue XCVIII, May 2014
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:29, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Saborsko massacre
Hi I took up your GOCE request on this article and have finished going through it. I'd appreciate it if you have a look over it. Blackmane (talk) 19:37, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
Battle of the Dalmatian Channels
 | Hello, Tomobe03. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Battle of the Dalmatian Channels at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 02:15, 24 May 2014 (UTC) |
RfC on Dalmatia
Dear user, there is an ongoing RfC on Dalmatia. You might want to participate. --Silvio1973 (talk) 14:37, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
RfC/U
Dear User as you know Director and myself experience often difficulties in communication. For this reason I have filed a RfC/U to discuss about this problem. I must confess that I genuinely believe he deals with me with improper language (inaccaptable, regardeless of the difficulties of communication we experienced). I did not file an AN/I because I would like to have a large discussion about this issue. And may be I am the guilty one.
If you want to partecipate to the discussion as a "User who tried and failed to resolve the dispute" or "Additional user endorsing this cause for concern") you can do at ].
To avoid the suspicion of canvassing I am contacting all the users involved in the previous and present dispute. If you think I forgote someone please tell me. Silvio1973 (talk) 12:44, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
Re: DYK
Thanks! Actually, not at all - my objective here was simply to push the article past the DYK line, even if I did overshoot that target a bit. I wanted to try doing a couple of GAs (Perković and Stublić are prime candidates), but right now to me that feels more like something that ought to be done, rather than something I'd actually enjoy doing. I'm in a DYK mood at the moment. :-) GregorB (talk) 10:57, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Vance plan
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Vance plan you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 13:41, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Vance plan
The article Vance plan you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Vance plan for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 04:01, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Vance plan
The article Vance plan you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Vance plan for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 12:21, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Article name(s)
I have a question regarding the names of navy related articles. I'm familiar that ship classes are written with cursive follwed by a dash and a short explanation, for instance, Una-class submarine, but what if the class doesn't have a name, but rather just a designation such as "Type 132" (a class of Yugoslav patrol boats). Do I just go with "Type-132 patrol boat", "Type 132-class patrol boat", or something third?--Saxum (talk) 13:30, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages:Naming conventions (ships)#Ships with hull number only has some info on numbered ship names, but I'm not quite sure what it means - if it were "T132", the title would be written as T132, but I'm not at all sure about "type" here. In that respect, perhaps it would be the best to ask at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Military history. As a side note, are you sure the Type 132 ship has no NATO designated name? For instance Project 641 soviet subs are presented here as Foxtrot-class submarine. I have no clue if the Type 132 had a NATO name or not, but it is not entirely possible. I'm sorry I was not of more help. Cheers.--Tomobe03 (talk) 19:35, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue XCIX, June 2014
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:20, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar |
| For your constant and long-standing efforts to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of the late unpleasantness in the former Yugoslavia --Demiurge1000 (talk) 21:07, 27 June 2014 (UTC) |