| Revision as of 07:59, 1 July 2014 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,593 editsm Signing comment by 68.39.152.45 - "→June 2014: "← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:44, 1 July 2014 edit undo68.39.152.45 (talk) →clearly this is most likely your sock puppet page huh .: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
| * For help, take a look at the ]. | * For help, take a look at the ]. | ||
| * The following is the log entry regarding this message: ] was by ] ] ] ANN scored at 0.895159 on 2014-06-30T08:44:27+00:00 <!-- MySQL ID: 1889096 -->. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-cluebotwarning1 --><!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --> ] (]) 08:44, 30 June 2014 (UTC) | * The following is the log entry regarding this message: ] was by ] ] ] ANN scored at 0.895159 on 2014-06-30T08:44:27+00:00 <!-- MySQL ID: 1889096 -->. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-cluebotwarning1 --><!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --> ] (]) 08:44, 30 June 2014 (UTC) | ||
| ] Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. | |||
| To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 07:58, 1 July 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == clearly this is most likely your sock puppet page huh . == | |||
| ] Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. | ] Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. | ||
Revision as of 10:44, 1 July 2014
Welcome!
|
June 2014
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to GG Allin has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: GG Allin was changed by Notavulgarusername (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.895159 on 2014-06-30T08:44:27+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:44, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.39.152.45 (talk) 07:58, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
clearly this is most likely your sock puppet page huh .
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.39.152.45 (talk) 07:58, 1 July 2014 (UTC)