| Revision as of 01:09, 1 July 2014 editAmirSurfLera (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users550 edits Not the appropriate place, seek consensus on the article's talk page← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:44, 1 July 2014 edit undoHuldra (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers83,874 edits →WP:AE: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px">]To enforce an ] decision, and for breaching the one revert restriction on ], per ], you have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''one week'''. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the ] and then appeal your block using the instructions there. <b>]</b> (] • ] • ]) 03:49, 21 June 2014 (UTC) <hr/><p style="line-height: 90%;"><small>'''Reminder to administrators:''' In March 2010, ArbCom adopted a ]: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" ). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped." Administrators who reverse this block without the clear authorisation described in that procedure will be summarily desysopped.</small></p></div><!-- Template:uw-aeblock --> | <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px">]To enforce an ] decision, and for breaching the one revert restriction on ], per ], you have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''one week'''. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the ] and then appeal your block using the instructions there. <b>]</b> (] • ] • ]) 03:49, 21 June 2014 (UTC) <hr/><p style="line-height: 90%;"><small>'''Reminder to administrators:''' In March 2010, ArbCom adopted a ]: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" ). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped." Administrators who reverse this block without the clear authorisation described in that procedure will be summarily desysopped.</small></p></div><!-- Template:uw-aeblock --> | ||
| == ] == | |||
| Hi, you are discussed . Cheers, ] (]) 19:44, 1 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:44, 1 July 2014
Hi! Welcome
I have requested enforcement of the active arbitration remedy of 1RR restriction on Operation Defensive Shield per your two reverts on june 7,
I have requested enforcement of arbitration remedies for article Operation Defensive Shield as part of the israel palestine arbitration agreement. WP:AETeeTylerToe (talk) 14:42, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- It seems you have broken the WP:1RR restriction at Operation Defensive Shield on June 7. Please respond to the AE complaint and explain why you shouldn't be blocked. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 16:38, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Operation Defensive Shield is covered by discretionary sanctions under WP:ARBPIA
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.Template:Z33 If you have concerns about the neutrality of this article you are expected to participate on the talk page. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 02:49, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
Please self-revert
You are back again at Operation Defensive Shield with a new revert to your preferred version of the article with no evidence that anyone supports your view on the talk page. The AE was closed with no action on the assumption that you would be more careful in the future. If you don't self revert a block for the original 1RR violation may be necessary. EdJohnston (talk) 04:38, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
- Hi. Actually this is the long-standing version of the paragraph before TeeTylerToe changed it. There was never a consensus on the talk page to add TeeTylerToe's POV-pushing bad-sourced version. Furthermore, I didn't break the 1RR in the first place, since this was not a revert (unlike this one), but a correction of my previous mistake when I removed the second paragraph unintentionally (fortunately Sean let me know of my error). Therefore I've never made more than one revert in a 24 hours period. Nevertheless, I'll settle the issue on the talk page of the article. Meanwhile I think the long-standing version before TeeTylerToe's changes should remain in place. I hope you'll understand. It's not my intention to break any rule or provoke an edit warring.--AmirSurfLera (talk) 08:45, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Previous account?
May I ask if you have previously edited Misplaced Pages, and if so, under which account-name? Cheers, Huldra (talk) 21:45, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
- No, I haven't. Thanks for asking.--AmirSurfLera (talk) 07:59, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
June 2014
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kingdom of Israel (united monarchy). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — Malik Shabazz /Stalk 17:10, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Back to WP:ARE again
See Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#AmirSurfLera Sepsis II (talk) 20:11, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
June 2014
Reminder to administrators: In March 2010, ArbCom adopted a procedure instructing administrators as follows: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" ). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped." Administrators who reverse this block without the clear authorisation described in that procedure will be summarily desysopped.
I will appreciate it if you email me through Wiki. thanks. Ykantor (talk) 12:46, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
See Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#AmirSurfLera 3 Sepsis II (talk) 07:52, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
June 2014
Your addition to Duvdevan Unit has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Misplaced Pages without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Misplaced Pages:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Misplaced Pages. For legal reasons, Misplaced Pages cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Misplaced Pages takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. -- Diannaa (talk) 23:31, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
Arbitration enforcement block
Reminder to administrators: In March 2010, ArbCom adopted a procedure instructing administrators as follows: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" ). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped." Administrators who reverse this block without the clear authorisation described in that procedure will be summarily desysopped.
WP:AE
Hi, you are discussed here. Cheers, Huldra (talk) 19:44, 1 July 2014 (UTC)