Talk:Cornwall Square: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 05:05, 2 July 2014 editUnscintillating (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users12,833 edits →stable version of article restored due to 2nd edit conflict in the context of unsourced additions citing WP:BURDEN: 2 re← Previous edit		Revision as of 05:15, 2 July 2014 edit undoUnscintillating (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users12,833 edits →stable version of article restored due to 2nd edit conflict in the context of unsourced additions citing WP:BURDEN: 2 proposalsNext edit →
Line 15:		Line 15:
	*I documented a similar situation recently in which you removed sourced information claiming WP:V as a justification.  ] (]) 05:05, 2 July 2014 (UTC)		*I documented a similar situation recently in which you removed sourced information claiming WP:V as a justification.  ] (]) 05:05, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
	*Something that people want to know here is what it is that you think is uncited.  One of your edits changed the tenant count from 70 to 60, which is new information, yet you did not add a source.  Meanwhile the edit comment for that edit talks about removals for WP:V.  People don't know what you are trying to do.  And then when I come along and start to clean up the confusion, you go manic.  You need to use Template:CN tags instead of just removing material that you don't like, and templating the worker bees, in the hopes of improving your chances of winning at AfD.  ] (]) 05:05, 2 July 2014 (UTC)		*Something that people want to know here is what it is that you think is uncited.  One of your edits changed the tenant count from 70 to 60, which is new information, yet you did not add a source.  Meanwhile the edit comment for that edit talks about removals for WP:V.  People don't know what you are trying to do.  And then when I come along and start to clean up the confusion, you go manic.  You need to use Template:CN tags instead of just removing material that you don't like, and templating the worker bees, in the hopes of improving your chances of winning at AfD.  ] (]) 05:05, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
			*I think we can agree (one can hope that we are able to agree about something), that the section "Stores and Services", and the last sentence of the lede that only lists tenants can be removed as per WP:TENANTS.  Do you agree?  ] (]) 05:15, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
			*For the remaining sourcing concerns that you have, do you agree to add Template:CN tags?  ] (]) 05:15, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:15, 2 July 2014

This page was proposed for deletion by Epeefleche (talk · contribs) on 2 June 2014 with the comment:
NN 252,502 square foot mall.
It was contested by Steam5 (talk · contribs) on 2 June 2014

This redirect does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Canada: Ontario Low‑importance

	Canada portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This redirect is supported by WikiProject Ontario.

Shopping Centers Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Shopping Centers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of enclosed shopping malls, outdoor shopping centers, and dead malls on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Shopping CentersWikipedia:WikiProject Shopping CentersTemplate:WikiProject Shopping CentersShopping center
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

stable version of article restored due to 2nd edit conflict in the context of unsourced additions citing WP:BURDEN

I've been trying to edit the article tonight, but another editor has been reacting to my edits without sufficient explanation. So I'm starting this talk page discussion. Unscintillating (talk) 04:18, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Reply: If you do a Google search on , the fourth link from the top is . Unscintillating (talk) 04:43, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

I already discussed this with you at length on your talk page. You have repeatedly violated wp:burden. Even with blp info. You have ignored and failed to respond to all warnings. See and and referring to this, and here. And all edit summaries that accorded with them. And just continued to violate wp:burden. --Epeefleche (talk) 04:44, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

I think people realize that templates are not "at length" discussion. In fact, templating my talk page as you have done (five times now) is considered to be uncivil. Unscintillating (talk) 05:05, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

I documented a similar situation recently in which you removed sourced information claiming WP:V as a justification. Unscintillating (talk) 05:05, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
Something that people want to know here is what it is that you think is uncited. One of your edits changed the tenant count from 70 to 60, which is new information, yet you did not add a source. Meanwhile the edit comment for that edit talks about removals for WP:V. People don't know what you are trying to do. And then when I come along and start to clean up the confusion, you go manic. You need to use Template:CN tags instead of just removing material that you don't like, and templating the worker bees, in the hopes of improving your chances of winning at AfD. Unscintillating (talk) 05:05, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
I think we can agree (one can hope that we are able to agree about something), that the section "Stores and Services", and the last sentence of the lede that only lists tenants can be removed as per WP:TENANTS. Do you agree? Unscintillating (talk) 05:15, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
For the remaining sourcing concerns that you have, do you agree to add Template:CN tags? Unscintillating (talk) 05:15, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Categories: