| Revision as of 19:05, 17 March 2014 editBearian (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Rollbackers84,444 edits →Benihana of Tokyo, Inc. v. Benihana, Inc.: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:23, 2 July 2014 edit undoMrBill3 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers39,593 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Daniel Amen. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
| As a case brief goes, it's not half bad, but even after editing it, it could still use more work. ] (]) 19:05, 17 March 2014 (UTC) | As a case brief goes, it's not half bad, but even after editing it, it could still use more work. ] (]) 19:05, 17 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
| == July 2014 == | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. | |||
| To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 15:23, 2 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:23, 2 July 2014
Speedy deletion nomination of John P McConnell
Hello Dmrwikiprof,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged John P McConnell for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Itsalleasy (talk) 02:38, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Dale Smith (January 29)
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/Dale Smith.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
contributions to Misplaced Pages!
- Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Dmrwikiprof, you are invited to the Teahouse
|
Hi Dmrwikiprof! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. |
File permission problem with File:Fleming Beach Sign.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Fleming Beach Sign.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Misplaced Pages:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Misplaced Pages:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Misplaced Pages's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:36, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1837 in archaeology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blasting (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:59, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
A page you started (Bank of New York Mellon v. Realogy Corporation) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Bank of New York Mellon v. Realogy Corporation, Dmrwikiprof!
Misplaced Pages editor 0x0077BE just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
This page still needs some work and needs reliable secondary sources establishing the notability of the case.
To reply, leave a comment on 0x0077BE's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Benihana of Tokyo, Inc. v. Benihana, Inc.
Hello Dmrwikiprof,
It seems to me that an article you worked on, Benihana of Tokyo, Inc. v. Benihana, Inc., may be copied from http://www.invispress.com/law/corporations/benihana.html. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Misplaced Pages is strict about copying from other sites.
It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.
Thank you for helping build a 💕!Template:Z18 MadmanBot (talk) 23:59, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Benihana of Tokyo, Inc. v. Benihana, Inc.
As a case brief goes, it's not half bad, but even after editing it, it could still use more work. Bearian (talk) 19:05, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
July 2014
Your recent editing history at Daniel Amen shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. MrBill3 (talk) 15:23, 2 July 2014 (UTC)