| Revision as of 18:32, 7 July 2014 editBracketBot (talk | contribs)173,351 edits Bot: Notice of potential markup breaking← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:20, 7 July 2014 edit undoEvergreenFir (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators129,267 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Kevin de León. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| *<nowiki>by proposing a first-of-its-kind, state-run retirement savings plan for low-income workers.<ref></nowiki>{{red|'''{'''}}<nowiki>McGreevy, Patrick . "Setback put Kevin de Leon on path to Senate leadership."Los Angeles Times. Los</nowiki> | *<nowiki>by proposing a first-of-its-kind, state-run retirement savings plan for low-income workers.<ref></nowiki>{{red|'''{'''}}<nowiki>McGreevy, Patrick . "Setback put Kevin de Leon on path to Senate leadership."Los Angeles Times. Los</nowiki> | ||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow ]. Thanks, <!-- (0, 0, 2, 0) --><!-- User:BracketBot/inform -->] (]) 18:32, 7 July 2014 (UTC) | It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow ]. Thanks, <!-- (0, 0, 2, 0) --><!-- User:BracketBot/inform -->] (]) 18:32, 7 July 2014 (UTC) | ||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. | |||
| To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] ] <small>Please {{]}}</small> 20:20, 7 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:20, 7 July 2014
July 2014
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Kevin de León has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Kevin de León was changed by Ericablang (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.879572 on 2014-07-07T18:07:12+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:07, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kevin de León may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- by proposing a first-of-its-kind, state-run retirement savings plan for low-income workers.<ref>{McGreevy, Patrick . "Setback put Kevin de Leon on path to Senate leadership."Los Angeles Times. Los
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:32, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Kevin de León shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 20:20, 7 July 2014 (UTC)