| Revision as of 01:16, 9 July 2014 edit50.171.11.116 (talk) Undid revision 616161665 by Sjones23 (talk)Blame it on AngusWOOF for this.← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:43, 9 July 2014 edit undoSolarra (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers27,143 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Michelle Ruff. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| {{talkback|User_talk:Cyphoidbomb#Okay.|ts=19:34, 18 June 2014 (UTC)}} | {{talkback|User_talk:Cyphoidbomb#Okay.|ts=19:34, 18 June 2014 (UTC)}} | ||
| ] (]) 19:34, 18 June 2014 (UTC) | ] (]) 19:34, 18 June 2014 (UTC) | ||
| == July 2014 == | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. | |||
| To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] ] ߷ ] 06:43, 9 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | |||
Revision as of 06:43, 9 July 2014
Talkback
Message added 19:34, 18 June 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:34, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
July 2014
Your recent editing history at Michelle Ruff shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. ♥ Solarra ♥ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 06:43, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.