| Revision as of 15:25, 5 April 2010 edit71.255.88.46 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:01, 9 July 2014 edit undoT13bot (talk | contribs)28,565 editsm T13bot task 1 using AWBNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion|{{mfd top collapse|1=''']'''}}|}}<div class="boilerplate |
{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion|{{mfd top collapse|1=''']'''}}|}}<div class="boilerplate mfd" style="background-color: #E3D2FB; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | ||
| {{noindex}} | {{noindex}} | ||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' | :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' | ||
Revision as of 23:01, 9 July 2014
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was Delete This was no better in user space than it was anywhere else. It's a blow-by-blow retelling of a tabloid story and has no place on Misplaced Pages, it fails WP:NPOV and WP:BLP by a wide margin. We do not need articles written by people whose sole professed purpose on Misplaced Pages is to document a purported scandal involving a living individual. Guy (Help!) 15:15, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
User:Ronald2010/Silviu Ionescu
Copy of a page recently deleted as a G10 attack page, I don't see it being improved as I have the feeling it is exactly as the author wanted it. As I am not quite sure if we should delete it or what to do if anything I am opening a discussion here, personally I am for deletion. Off2riorob (talk) 15:06, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
- Comment (from deleting admin) - the page (Silviu Ionescu) was too G10 to remain, but that doesn't mean it can't be improved. I don't think we should be deleting things because someone has "the feeling it is exactly as the author wanted it". I also suggested that MfD might be the right venue, but I'd rather we actually ask and then listen to the answer. I've opened that discussion at User talk:Ronald2010. Frank | talk 15:12, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.