Revision as of 03:04, 8 July 2014 editFredddie (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors102,318 edits →One-way pairs in KML files: another option← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:03, 15 July 2014 edit undoNE2 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers190,449 edits →KML for Interstate Highway System: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
:That's along the lines of what I usually do. If there's more than one one-way pair, I usually specify and name it "Eastbound in (city name)". ]]] 22:24, 7 July 2014 (UTC) | :That's along the lines of what I usually do. If there's more than one one-way pair, I usually specify and name it "Eastbound in (city name)". ]]] 22:24, 7 July 2014 (UTC) | ||
::You could do what {{user|TheWombatGuru}} does and make separate lines for EB and WB for the entire route, not just the one-way couplet. –]] 03:04, 8 July 2014 (UTC) | ::You could do what {{user|TheWombatGuru}} does and make separate lines for EB and WB for the entire route, not just the one-way couplet. –]] 03:04, 8 July 2014 (UTC) | ||
== KML for ] == | |||
I cleaned up the topology of the NHPN data a bit and uploaded ] (). For several reasons I'm not linking to it in the article: | |||
*I didn't do much geometry cleanup from the NHPN data, so some Interstates are horribly imprecise (e.g. I-72 west of Jacksonville, IL; I-795 in NC, I-10 at TX exit 294). | |||
*There are no objective standards for which future Interstates (suffixed F) I included. I may have also gotten the status of a few recent additions wrong. | |||
*Curves are a bit too simplified in areas (due to Misplaced Pages size constraints). | |||
*There's also a problem with , which doesn't affect display, but creates annoying effects when editing. | |||
However, it is good enough for small-scale mapping (for which you'd probably want to filter out all future routes). --] 02:03, 15 July 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:03, 15 July 2014
U.S. Roads Project‑class | ||||||||||
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the WikiProject U.S. Roads/Maps task force page. |
|
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 2 months |
The maps task force asks that all map requests be left on the requests page and not on this page. Your cooperation is appreciated. |
blank map - help
File:Great River Road map.svg opens fine in Inkscape, but renders blank. --NE2 10:02, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- Done - I guess you forgot to hit "fit window to selection." I fixed it using the background white path as the window. —Mr. Matté (/Contrib) 11:03, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Quality control
Is there any way to view or download a bunch of KML files at once for quality control/error checking purposes? --NE2 17:07, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
- Presumably you could use any browser extension designed for mass downloading for this purpose, e.g. DownThemAll! —Scott5114↗ 18:39, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
One-way pairs in KML files
How do I represent a one-way pair? Would two paths with names 'eastbound' and 'westbound' work, like I did on U.S. Route 460 in Virginia? --NE2 22:01, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
- That's along the lines of what I usually do. If there's more than one one-way pair, I usually specify and name it "Eastbound in (city name)". TCN7JM 22:24, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
- You could do what TheWombatGuru (talk · contribs) does and make separate lines for EB and WB for the entire route, not just the one-way couplet. –Fredddie™ 03:04, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
KML for Interstate Highway System
I cleaned up the topology of the NHPN data a bit and uploaded a KML file for the entire IHS (view on the Goog). For several reasons I'm not linking to it in the article:
- I didn't do much geometry cleanup from the NHPN data, so some Interstates are horribly imprecise (e.g. I-72 west of Jacksonville, IL; I-795 in NC, I-10 at TX exit 294).
- There are no objective standards for which future Interstates (suffixed F) I included. I may have also gotten the status of a few recent additions wrong.
- Curves are a bit too simplified in areas (due to Misplaced Pages size constraints).
- There's also a problem with multipart lines, which doesn't affect display, but creates annoying effects when editing.
However, it is good enough for small-scale mapping (for which you'd probably want to filter out all future routes). --NE2 02:03, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Categories: